Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:55:40.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conditional Constructions: The Special Case of Modern Dutch mits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Saskia Daalder
Saskia Daalder*
Affiliation:
VU University Amsterdam
*
Department of Language and Communication, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands, [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As a contribution to research into conditional constructions, this article presents a novel analysis of the Modern Dutch construction defined by the conditional conjunction mits ‘provided that', a less frequent subordinating conjunction that differs in meaning from the main conditional conjunctions als and indien (both ‘if'). Using examples from a corpus of 300 text passages containing the construction, we discuss its syntactic and semantic characteristics. It is found that clauses introduced by mits are only appended as a condition to matrix expressions that imply the existence of some specific desirability. We discuss the general viability of the notion of desirability for grammatical analysis. In the interpretation of each instance of a mits-construction, the precise identity of the desirability concerned has to be determined, as well as its locus. This process makes knowledge available about a specific balance of interests of the communicators and other concerned parties. The Dutch mits-construction is thus found to lead the interpreter to understand details of configurations of diverging interests.*

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 21 , Issue 2: Special Issue in Honour of Martin Durrell , June 2009 , pp. 231 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akatsuka, Noriko. 1997. Negative conditionality, subjectification, and conditional reasoning. On conditionals again, ed. by Athanasiadou, Angeliki & Dirven, René, 323–354. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 143.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1999. Towards a theory of desirability in conditional reasoning. Function and structure: In honor of Susumo Kuno, ed. by Kamio, Akio & Takami, Ken-ichi, 195–213. (Pragmatics and Beyond. New series, 59.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Akatsuka] McCawley Akatsuka, Noriko, & Susan, Strauss. 2000. Counterfactual reasoning and desirability. Cause—condition—concession—contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives, ed. by Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Kortmann, Bernd, 205–234. (Topics in English Linguistics, 33.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANS = Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst. 1997. 2nd edn. by Walter Haeseryn et al. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan. 1986. Lexical semantics. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Daalder, Saskia. 2007. Een blik in het verleden van een voegwoord: mits in zijn functie van voorzetsel in ouder en nieuwer Nederlands. Voortgang: Jaarboek voor de neerlandistiek 25.401–419.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, & Eve, Sweetser. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 108.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat, & Susan, Reed. 2001. Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. (Topics in English Linguistics, 37.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Den Hertog, Cornelis Herman. 1973. Nederlandse spraakkunst. 3rd edn. by Hulshof, Hans. 3 vols. Amsterdam: Versluys.Google Scholar
Durrell, Martin. 1996. Hammer's German grammar and usage. 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
EWN = Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands. 2003. Ed. by Marlies Philippa et al. 4 vols. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Henny. 1998. Adverbs of degree in Dutch and related languages. (Linguistik Aktuell, 21.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Henny, & Jack, Hoeksema. 1994. Bar and bijster: een onderzoek naar twee polariteits-gevoelige adverbia. Gramma/TTT, Tijdschrift voor Tekstwetenschap 3.75–88.Google Scholar
Knobloch, Johannes (ed.). 1986. Sprachwissenschaftliches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, & Jan, Svartvik. 1975. A communicative grammar of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
MNW = Eelco Verwijs & Jakob Verdam. 1882–1952. Middelnederlandsch woordenboek. 10 vols. ‘s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney, Greenbaum, Geoffrey, Leech, & Jan, Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rijpma, Enneus, & Frans Gerhard, Schuringa. 1969. Nederlandse spraakkunst. 24th edn. by van Bakel, Jan. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1985. Conditional markers. Iconicity in syntax, ed. by John, Haiman, 289–307. (Typological Studies in Language, 6.) Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Es, Gustaaf Amandus. 1953. Voegwoordelijke verbindingen ter uitdrukking van de conditionele (hypothetische) modaliteit in het Nederlands. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse taal- en letterkunde 71.1–119.Google Scholar
Van Es, Gustaaf Amandus, & Paulus, Petrus Johannes van Caspel. 1975. Samengestelde zin: Incorporatie. (Archief voor de Nederlandse Syntaxis.) Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
VMNW = Willy J. J., Pijnenburg, Karina H., van Dalen-Oskam, Katrien A.C., Depuydt, & Tanneke H., Schoonheim. 2001. Vroegmiddelnederlands woordenboek. 4 vols. Leiden: Gopher Publishers.Google Scholar
WNT = Woordenboek der Nederlandsche taal, vol. 9. 1913. Ed. by Albert Kluyver et al. ‘s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff; Leiden: Sijthoff.Google Scholar