Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:35:54.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Advanced Learners’ Use of Dutch Second Person Pronouns During Residence Abroad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Roel Vismans
Roel Vismans*
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
*
Department of Germanic Studies, University of Sheffield, Jessop West, 1 Upper Hanover Street, Sheffield S3 7RA, UK, [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The complex sociolinguistic system for Dutch forms of address presents students of Dutch as a foreign language with particular difficulties in learning to use second person pronouns appropriately. This article discusses the role of a period of residence in the Low Countries in advancing these students’ proficiency in this respect. The research is based on interviews with final-year students of Dutch in the UK. The analysis is framed in terms of intercultural communicative competence and approaches to learning.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 21 , Issue 2: Special Issue in Honour of Martin Durrell , June 2009 , pp. 211 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Belz, Julie A., & Celeste, Kinginger. 2003. Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German. The case of address forms. Language Learning 53.591–647.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, & Albert, Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. Style in language, ed. by Sebeok, Thomas A., 253–276. Boston, MA: MIT Press. (Reprinted Language and social context, ed. by Pier Paolo Giglioli, 252–282. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 1972.)Google Scholar
Byram, Michael. 1997. Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Durrell, Martin. 2007. Anredegewohnheiten im Deutschen und Englischen. Der Ausdruck der Person im Deutschen, ed. by Behr, Irmtraud, Larrory, Anne, & Samson, Gunhild, 89–100. (Eurogermanistik 24) Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan M. 1972. Sociolinguistic rules of address. Sociolinguistics ed. by Pride, John B. & Holmes, Janet, 225–240. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kramsch, Claire. 1993. Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsden, Paul. 2003. Learning to teach in Higher Education. 2nd edn. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Roberts, Celia, Michael, Byram, Ano, Barro, Shirley, Jordan, & Brian, Street. 2001. Language learners as ethnographers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Säljö, Roger. 1979. Learning in the learner's perspective. I. Some commonsense conceptions. (Reports from the Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg 76.) Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Van Baalen, Christine, Ludo, Beheydt, & Alice, van Kalsbeek. 2003. Cultuur in taal. Interculturele vaardigheden voor docenten Nederlands aan anderstaligen. Utrecht: Nederlands Centrum Buitenlanders.Google Scholar
Van den Toorn, Maarten C. 1977. De problematiek van de Nederlandse aanspreekvormen. De Nieuwe Taalgids 70.520–540.Google Scholar
Vandekerckhove, Reinhild. 2005. Belgian Dutch versus Netherlandic Dutch: New patterns of divergence? On pronouns of address and diminutive. Multilingua 24.379–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kalsbeek, Alice. 2003. Taal en cultuur or cultuur en taal? Cultuur in taal. Interculturele vaardigheden voor docenten Nederlands aan anderstaligen. van Baalen, Christine, Beheydt, Ludo, & Kalsbeek, AliceVan, 63–102. Utrecht: Nederlands Centrum Buitenlanders.Google Scholar
Vermaas, Johanna A. M. 2002. Veranderingen in de Nederlandse aanspreekvormen van de dertiende t/m de twintigste eeuw. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Vismans, Roel. 2003/04. Les pronoms de la deuxième personne en néerlandais et les étudiants de néerlandais langue étrangère: forme, usage, apprentissage. Franco-British Studies 33–34.157–171. (Special Issue: Second person pronouns and forms of address in contemporary European languages).Google Scholar
Vismans, Roel. 2004. U and non-u: Learning to use Dutch second person pronouns. Dutch Crossing. A Journal of Low Countries Studies 28.142–162.Google Scholar
Vismans, Roel. 2007a. Student tussen twee vuren: intercultureel tutoyeren. Akten des XI. Internationalen Germanistenkongress, Paris 2005: Germanistik im Konflikt der Kulturen, ed. by Jean-Marie Valentin, vol. 2, 175–182. (Jahrbuch für Internationale Germanistik/Reihe A. Band 78). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vismans, Roel. 2007b. Aanspreekvormen in Nederlandse en Vlaamse personeelsadvertenties voor hoogopgeleiden. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 29.284–308.Google Scholar