Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T01:46:59.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The accentuation and development of PGmc. */ga-/

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Daniel P. Quinlin
Daniel P. Quinlin
Affiliation:
Michigan State UniversityEast Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies on the development of PGmc. */ga-/ have been inadequate due, in part, to a misunderstanding or underestimation of the roles of word accent and syntactic accent. Purported evidence for stressed */ga-/ in Proto-Germanic or later stages is dubious and can be refuted convincingly. This article suggests that PGmc. */ga-/ never received primary word stress because it had become a clitic. Such a hypothesis allows for an unproblematic phonological derivation from Proto-Indo-European and is a logical premise for interpreting subsequent developments in the Germanic languages.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , July 1991 , pp. 145 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Bammesberger, Alfred. 1981. “Die Betonung der nominalen ga-Komposita im Urgermanischen.” Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 103: 377–91.Google Scholar
Bennett, William H. 1968. “The accentuation of Gothic ga-.” Germanic studies in honor of Edward Henry Sehrt. Eds. Raven, F. A., Legner, W. K. and King, J. C.. Miami Linguistic Series, 1. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. Pp. 53–60.Google Scholar
Bennett, William H.. 1972. “Prosodic features in Proto-Germanic.” Toward a grammar of Proto-Germanic. Eds. van Coetsem, Frans and Kufner, H. L.. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Pp. 99–116.Google Scholar
Brunner, Karl. 1965. Altenglische Grammatik. 3rd ed.Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleasby, Richard and Vigfússon, Gudbrand. 1874. Icelandic-English dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Falk, Hjalmar and Torp, Alf. 1903. Etymologisk ordbog over det norske og det danske sprog. Christiana: H. Aschenhoug.Google Scholar
Feist, Sigmund. 1939. Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der gotischen Sprache. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jakob. 1878. Deutsche Grammatik. 2nd ed.Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Finnur. 1913–16. Lexicon poeticum. København: S. L. Møller.Google Scholar
Josephson, Folke. 1976–77. “On the function of the preverb ga-.” Indogermanische Forschungen 81: 152–75.Google Scholar
Kieckers, Ernst. 1928. Handbuch der vergleichenden gotischen Grammatik. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1966. “Über den deutschen Akzent.” Un-tersuchungen über Akzent und Satzintonation im Deutschen. Studia grammatica, 7. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Pp. 69–98.Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1897. Urgermanisch: Vorgeschichte der altgermanischen Dialekte. 2nd ed. Grundriß der germanischen Philologie, 2. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1913. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 7th ed.Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1957. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 17th ed.Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, W. 1968. Handbuch des Gotischen. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Michels, V. 1927. “Zur deutschen Akzentgeschichte.” Germania: Edward Sievers zum 75. Geburtstage. Halle: Max Niemeyer. Pp. 38–89.Google Scholar
Opitz, Martin. 1658. Prosodia Germanica oder Buch von der Deutschen Poeterey. Franckfurt am Main: Christian Klein.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius. 1949. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern and München: Francke.Google Scholar
Prokosch, E. 1938. A comparative Germanic grammar. Baltimore, MD: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Streitberg, Wilhelm, ed. 1916. Geschichte der indogermanischen Sprachwissenschaft. 2. Teil: Die Erforschung der indogermanischen Sprachen, 2. Teil: Germanisch. Berlin and Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vries, Jan de. 1977. Altnordisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 3rd ed.Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Walde, A. 1965. Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Weizenböck, Georg. 1929. “Untersuchung über Gasteig.” Zeitschrift für Ortsnamenforschung 5: 209–17.Google Scholar