Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:25:49.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The two versions of Malory's Morte Darthur: Multiple negation and the editing of the text. By Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade. (Arthurian Studies, 35.) Woodbridge, Suffolk: D. S. Brewer, 1995. Pp. 169. Hardcover. $53.00.

Review products

The two versions of Malory's Morte Darthur: Multiple negation and the editing of the text. By Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade. (Arthurian Studies, 35.) Woodbridge, Suffolk: D. S. Brewer, 1995. Pp. 169. Hardcover. $53.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Yoko Iyeiri
Yoko Iyeiri
Affiliation:
Department of EnglishKobe City University of Foreign StudiesNishi-ku, Kobe-shi, 651–21Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , Spring 1997 , pp. 136 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, Charles. 1976. Early modern English. London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Burnley, David. 1983. A guide to Chaucer's language. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dekeyser, Xavier. 1990. The prepositions with, mid and again(st) in Old and Middle English: A case-study of historical lexical semantics. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 5.35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekeyser, Xavier. 1994. The mutual quantifiers much/many and their analogues: A historical lexico-semantic analysis. Leuvense Bijdragen 83.289–99.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 1992. Syntax. The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume II: 1066–1476, ed. by Blake, Norman, 207–408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fries, Charles C. 1940. American English grammar. New York and London: S. Appleton-Century Company.Google Scholar
Gordon, Ian A. 1966. The movement of English prose. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hellinga, Lotte. 1977. The Malory manuscript and Caxton. In Hellinga and Kelliher, 91–101.Google Scholar
Hellinga, Lotte. 1981. The Malory manuscript and Caxton. Aspects of Malory, ed. by Takamiya, Toshiyuki and Derek, Brewer, 127–41. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Hellinga, Lotte. and Kelliher, Hilton. 1977. The Malory manuscript. British Library Journal 3.91–113.Google Scholar
Iyeiri, Yoko. 1992. Negative constructions in selected Middle English verse texts. Doctoral dissertation, University of St. Andrews, Scotland.Google Scholar
Iyeiri, Yoko. 1995. Negative contraction and syntactic conditions in Middle English verse. English Studies 76.424–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, George. B. 1978. Negative adverbs in early Middle English. English Studies 59.295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: Andr. Fred. Høst and Søn, Kgl. Hof-Boghandel.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1940. A Modern English grammar on historical principles. Volume 4. Copenhagen: E. Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Milroy, James, and Milroy, Lesley. 1985. Authority in language: Investigating language prescription and standardisation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinaver, Eugène (ed.). 1990. The works of Sir Thomas Malory. 3rd edn. Revised by Peter J. C. Field. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
van der Wurff, Wim. 1988. A remarkable gap in the history of English syntax. Folia Linguistica Historica 9.117–59.Google Scholar
Yeates-Edwards, Paul. 1976. Caxton and the Winchester Malory. Library Association Record 78.262–64.Google Scholar