Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:51:20.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Starke “schwache” Verben — schwache “starke” Verben: Deutsche Verbflexion und Natürlichkeit. By Andreas Bittner. (Studien zur deutschen Grammatik, 51.) Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 1996. Pp. xiii, 224. Paper. DM 68,00.

Review products

Starke “schwache” Verben — schwache “starke” Verben: Deutsche Verbflexion und Natürlichkeit. By Andreas Bittner. (Studien zur deutschen Grammatik, 51.) Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 1996. Pp. xiii, 224. Paper. DM 68,00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Robert K. Bloomer
Robert K. Bloomer
Affiliation:
Department of European Languages, Literatures, and CulturesState University of New York at Stony BrookStony Brook, New York 11794–3359 [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Spring 1999 , pp. 103 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bittner, Andreas. 1985. Wie schwach sind die starken Verben? Überlegungen und Vorschläge zu einer Klassifizierung der neuhochdeutschen Verben. Linguistische Studien (Reihe A: Arbeitsberichte) 126.51–75.Google Scholar
Bloomer, Robert K. 1994. System-congruity and the participles of Modern German and Modern English: A study in natural morphology. (Beiträge zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft, 6.) Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Bloomer, Robert K. Forthcoming. Nonmorphological isolation of participles in German and English: Also a cause of polymorphy? Folia Linguistica.Google Scholar
Duden Grammatik = Drosdowski, Günter, (ed.). 1984. Duden Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 4th edn.Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, Willi. 1981. Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Wörterbuch der deutschen Gegenwartssprache = Klappenbach, Ruth, and Steinitz, Wolfgang. 1978–1981. Wörterbuch der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 10th edn.Berlin: Zentralinstitut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich. 1984. Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. (Studia Grammatica, 21.) Berlin: Zentralinstitut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar