Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:54:46.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Distribution and Acquisition of the West Germanic ‘Need’-Verbs: German between Dutch and English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2016

Jing Lin
Jing Lin*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
*
Department of Dutch Linguistics, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012VB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates three verbs expressing necessity in the three West Germanic languages: Dutch hoeven, English need, and German brauchen. These three verbs are all categorized as negative polarity items (npis). However, there are differences in their distribution as NPIs, which posit German brauchen between English need and Dutch hoeven. By analyzing two factors that may influence acquisition, namely, opacity and input frequency, this paper moreover presents a similar pattern for the acquisition of these NPIs: The Dutch NPI hoeven emerges earlier in child language than its German counterpart, which in turn arises earlier than the English NPI need.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 28 , Special Issue 4: New Directions in Comparative Germanic Linguistics , December 2016 , pp. 349 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Behrens, Heike. 2006. The input–output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes 21. 2–24.Google Scholar
Bol, Gerard, & Kuiken, Folkert. 1990. Grammatical analysis of developmental language disorders: A study of the morphosyntax of children with specific language disorders, with hearing impairment and with down's syndrome. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 4. 77–86.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 1978. Assimilation in child language and elsewhere. Journal of Child Language 5. 373–378.Google Scholar
Crystal, David, Fletcher, Paul, & Garman, Michael. 1989. Grammatical analysis of language disability. London: Cole and Whurr.Google Scholar
Fikkert, Paula. 1994. On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University dissertation.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Paul, & Garman, Michael. 1988. Normal language development and language impairment: Syntax and beyond. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2. 97–113.Google Scholar
Forrester, Michael. 2002. Appropriating cultural conceptions of childhood: Participation in conversation. Childhood 9. 255–278.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison. 1995. Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect variation and parameter setting. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack. 2000. Negative polarity items: Triggering, scope and c-command. Negation and polarity: Syntactic and semantic perspectives, ed. by Horn, Laurence & Kato, Yasuhiko, 115–146. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun, Lansu, Monic, & Westerduin, Marion. 1988. Complexe verba [Complex verbs]. Glot 10. 61–77.Google Scholar
Howe, Christine. 1981. Acquiring language in a conversational context. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 1986. From meta-processes to conscious access: Evidence from children's metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition 23. 95–147.Google Scholar
Koster, Charlotte, & Van der Wal, Sjoukje. 1995. Acquiring a negative polarity verb. Papers from the German-Dutch Colloquium on Language Acquisition, ed. by Verrips, Maaike & Wijnen, Frank, 109–126. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, Instituut voor Algemene Taalwetenschap.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William A. 1979. Negative polarity items as inherent scope relations. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Levelt, Clara Cecilia. 1994. On the acquisition of place: proefschrift. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University dissertation.Google Scholar
Lieven, Elena V.M., Salomo, Dorothé, & Tomasello, Michael. 2009. Two-year-old children's production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 20. 481–507.Google Scholar
Lin, Jing, Weerman, Fred, & Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2015. Emerging NPIs: The acquisition of Dutch hoeven ‘need’. The Linguistic Review 32. 333–374.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2009. The childes project. Tools for analyzing talk. 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Miller, Max. 1979. The logic of language development in early childhood. Berlin: Springer Google Scholar
Rowland, Caroline F., & Fletcher, Sarah L. 2006. The effect of sampling on estimates of lexical specificity and error rates. Journal of Child Language 33. 859–877.Google Scholar
Szagun, Gisela. 2001. Learning different regularities: The acquisition of noun plurals by German-speaking children. First Language 21. 109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theakston, Anna L., Lieven, Elena V. M., Pine, Julian M., & Rowland, Caroline F. 2001. The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: An alternative account. Journal of Child Language 28. 127–152.Google Scholar
Van der Wal, Sjoukje. 1996. Negative polarity items and negation: Tandem acquisition. Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen dissertation.Google Scholar
Van der Wouden, Ton. 1997. Negative contexts: Collocation, polarity and multiple negation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van der Wouden, Ton. 2001. Three modal verbs. Zur Verbmorphologie germanischer Sprachen [On verbal morphology in Germanic languages], ed. by Sheila, Watts, West, Jonathan, & Solms, Hans-Joachim, 189–210. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Van, Kampen, Jacqueline, Nelly. 1994. The learnability of the left branch condition. Linguistics in the Netherlands 199. 83–94.Google Scholar
Wagner, Klaus R. 1985. How much do children say in a day? Journal of Child Language 12. 475–487.Google Scholar
Wells, Gordon. 1981. Learning through interaction: The study of language development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wijnen, Frank. 1988. Spontaneous word fragmentations in children: Evidence for the syllable as a unit in speech production. Journal of Phonetics 16. 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijnen, Frank. 1992. Incidental word and sound errors in young speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 31. 734–755.Google Scholar
Wijnen, Frank, & Bol, Gerard. 1993. The escape from the optional infinitive stage. Language and Cognition 3. 105–118.Google Scholar
Wilson, John, & Henry, Alison. 1998. Parameter setting within a socially realistic linguistics. Language in Society 27. 1–21.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Frans. 1981. Negatief polaire uitdrukkingen I [Negative polarity expressions I]. Glot 4. 35–132.Google Scholar

Corpora and Other Data Sources

CHILDES (Child Language Data Exchange System). Available at http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/ Google Scholar
Rigol, Rosemarie. 2007. German Rigol corpus. Available at: http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/browser/index.php?url=German/Rigol/ Google Scholar