No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Morphological Change Up Close. Two and a Half Centuries of Verbal Inflection in Nuremberg. By David Fertig. (Linguistische Arbeiten, 422.) Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 2000. Pp. ix, 179. Paper. €52.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 March 2005
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- REVIEWS
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2005 Society for Germanic Linguistics
References
Bybee Joan.
1985. Morphology. A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bybee Joan.
1994. Morphological universals and change. The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 5, ed. by
R. E. Asher and
J. M. Y. Simpson,
2557–
2562.
New York:
Pergamon.
Joseph Brian D.
1998. Diachronic morphology. The handbook of morphology, ed. by
Andrew Spencer and
Arnold M. Zwicky,
351–
373.
Oxford:
Blackwell.
Klein Jared S.
1999. Theory vs. practice in diachronic linguistics. Review of Historical linguistics and language change, by Roger Lass 1997. Language Sciences
21.
87–
104.Google Scholar
Labov William.
1972. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society
1.
97–
120.Google Scholar
Labov William.
1989. The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change
1.
85–
97.Google Scholar
Lass Roger.
1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics
26.
79–
102.Google Scholar
Lass Roger.
1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wurzel Wolfgang Ullrich.
1984. Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie.