Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:34:21.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Linguistic Theories of Simon Stevin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Daniel Brink
Affiliation:
Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona 85287

Abstract

Although modern commentators readily acknowledge Stevin's significance as a creator of Dutch technical vocabulary, his linguistic theories are generally either ignored, or are dismissed as naive or confused nonsense. These theories were, however, the basic motivation for Stevin's considerable efforts in vocabulary creation, and they were taken seriously and literally by his contemporaries; Stevin's theories were of fundamental significance to the Dutch “language patriots” of the early seventeenth century.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Albertus, Laurentius. 1895. Teutsch Grammatick oder SprachKunst (1573). Ed. Müller-Fraureuth, C.. Straßburg.Google Scholar
Bakker, D. M. and Dibbets, G. R. W.. 1977. Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse taalkunde, 's Hertogenbosch: Malmberg.Google Scholar
Becanus, Johannes Goropius. 1569. Origines Antwerpianae. Antwerp.Google Scholar
Bornemann, Ulrich. 1916. Anlehnung und Abgrenzung: Untersuchung zur Rezeption der niederländischen Literatur in der deutschen Dichtungsreform des siebzehnten Jahrhunderts. Respublica Literaria Neerlandica, 1. Amsterdam: van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Branden, L. van den. 1956. Het Streven naar Verheerlijking, Zuivering en Opbouw van het Nederlands in de 16de Eeuw. Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie voor Taal en Letterkunde, 6: 77. Rpt. Arnhem, 1967.Google Scholar
Brink, Daniel. 1985. “Goropius Becanus and the movement to establish a written standard for Dutch in the 16th century.” Papers from the first interdisciplinary conference on Netherlandic studies. Ed. Fletcher, William H.. Lanham, MD: Univ. Press of America. Pp. 7985.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, E. J. 1961. The mechanization of the world picture. Tr. Dikshoorn, C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, E. J.. 1970. Simon Stevin: Science in the Netherlands around 1600. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Bruce C. 1983. Dutch: A linguistic history of Holland and Belgium. Leiden: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Groot, K. W. de. 1919. “Het purisme van Simon Stevin.” Nieuwe Taalgids 13: 161–82.Google Scholar
Jellinek, Max Hermann. 1898. Geschichte der neuhochdeutschen Grammatik von den Anfängen bis auf Adelung. 2 vols. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1938. Growth and structure of the English language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sarton, George. 1934. Simon Stevin of Bruges (1548–1620). Bruges: Saint Catherine Press. Rpt. of ISIS No. 61 (Vol. 21,2), July, 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, Hendrick Laurenszoon. 1913. Twe-Spraack vande Nederduitsche Letterkunst (1584). Preface by Dirck Volckertszoon Coornhert. Ed. Kooiman, Klaas. Groningen: Firma Vredevoogd.Google Scholar
Stevin, Simon. 1955. The principal works of Simon Stevin. 5 vols. Eds. Crone, Ernst, Dijksterhuis, E. J., Forbes, R. J., Minnaert, M. G. J., and Pannekoek, A.. Tr. Dikshoorn, C.. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Struik, Dirk J. 1981. The land of Stevin and Huygens: A sketch of science and technology in the Dutch republic during the Golden Century. Studies in the History of Modern Science, 7. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Vondel, Jost van den. 1937. Volledige Dichtwerke en oorspronkelij proza. Ed. Verweij, Albert. Amsterdam: Becht.Google Scholar