Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:06:48.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Faroese Preaspiration: A Nucleus/Onset Interaction Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2022

Laurence Voeltzel
Laurence Voeltzel*
Affiliation:
Université de Nantes
*
UMR6310-LLING, CNRS & Université de Nantes Université de Nantes UFR des Lettres et Langages 7 Chemin de la Censive du Tertre, BP 81227 44312 Nantes Cedex 3 France [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper focuses on Faroese preaspiration, a phenomenon observed in Western Nordic and in some Eastern Nordic dialects, where fortis stops are preceded by a glottal frication noise in specific contexts. After observing all environments where the mechanism is triggered, I provide phonological representations of the phenomena based on Government Phonology 2.0. In this model, the segmental structures contain melody but also space, which allows for intersegmental relations such as lengthening, even without adding new morphological material. As preaspiration depends on the vowel preceding the fortis stop—more precisely, on its vocalic quality and length—I propose analyzing preaspiration as a spreading of the fortis consonant toward the vowel on the left. In doing so, I provide a unified analysis of all environments in which preaspiration occurs.*

Keywords

Western NordicGovernment Phonology 2.0segmental structuresyllabic structurephonological lengtheningpreaspiration
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , September 2022 , pp. 288 - 339
Check for updates
Copyright
© Society for Germanic Linguistics 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank my reviewers for their insightful comments and my colleagues at the LLING for their helpful feedback. All remaining errors are mine.

References

REFERENCES

Adams, Jonathan, & Petersen, Hjalmar P.. 2014. Faroese: A language course for beginners. Tórshavn: Stiðin.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1972. The Faroese vowel system. Contributions to generative phonology, ed. by Brame, Micheal, 1–21. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Árnason, Kristján. 2011. The phonology of Icelandic and Faroese. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backley, Phillip. 2011. An introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Michael P., & Weyhe, Eivind. 2002. Faroese. The Germanic languages, ed. by König, Ekkehard & van der Auwera, Johan, 190–218. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beckman, Jill, Jessen, Michael, & Ringen, Catherine. 2013. Empirical evidence for laryngeal features: Aspirating vs. true voice languages. Journal of Linguistics 49. 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belasco, Simon. 1958. Variations in vowel duration: Phonemically or phonetically conditioned? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 30. 1049–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, Joaquim Brandão de. 2002. De la syllabation en termes de contours CV. Paris, France: École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Habilitation à diriger des recherches.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Joaquim Brandão de. 2008. From positions to transitions: A contour-based account of lenition and fortition. Lenition and fortition, ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Philippe Ségéral, & Tobias Scheer, 415–445. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, Joaquim Brandão de. 2014. C/V interactions in strict CV. The form of structure, the structure of forms: Essays in honor of Jean Lowenstamm, vol. 12, ed. by Bendjaballah, Sabrina, Lahrouchi, Mohamed, Lampitelli, Nicolas, & Faust, Noam, 123–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew. 1970. Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica 22. 129–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, Nick G., & Hume, Elizabeth V.. 1995. The internal organization of speech sounds. The handbook of phonological theory, ed. by John, A. Goldsmith, Riggle, Jason, & Alan, C. L. Yu, 245–306. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1962. Some factors of vowel duration and their cross-linguistic validity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34. 1141–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordeeva, Olga B., & Scobbie, James M.. 2010. Preaspiration as a correlate of word-final voice in Scottish English fricatives. Turbulent sounds: An interdisciplinary guide, vol. 21, ed. by Fuchs, Susanne, Toda, Martine, & Marzena, Zygis, 167–208. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar Ölafur. 2003. Laryngeal licensing and laryngeal neutralization in Faroese and Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26. 45–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John. 1990. Segmental complexity and phonological government. Phonology 7. 255–300.Google Scholar
Harris, John. 1994. English sound structure. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, John, & Lindsey, Geoff. 1995. The elements of phonological representation. Frontiers of phonology: Atoms, structures, derivations, ed. by Durand, Jacques & Katamba, Francis, 34–79. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Heimisdóttir, Linda Ö. 2014. Phonological opacity and Icelandic preaspiration. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20. 141–149.Google Scholar
Helgason, Pétur. 2002. Preaspiration in the Nordic languages: Synchronic and diachronic aspects. Stockholm, Sweden: University of Stockholm dissertation.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1938. The syllable as a structural unit. The Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. by Blancquaert, Edgard & Pée, Willem, 266–272. Ghent: University of Ghent.Google Scholar
Hoole, Philip, & Bombien, Lasse. 2010. Velar and glottal activity in Icelandic. Between the regular and the particular in speech and language, ed. by Fuchs, Susanne, Mooshammer, Christine, & Żygis, Marzena, 171–204. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
House, Arthur S. 1961. On vowel duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33. 1174–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth. 1996. Coronal consonant, front vowel parallels in Maltese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14. 163–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iosad, Pavel. 2020. The life cycle of preaspiration in the Gaelic languages. Language on the move across domains and communities: Selected papers from the 12th Triennial Forum for Research on the Languages of Scotland and Ulster, ed. by Kopaczyk, Joanna & Millar, Robert McColl, 200–230. Aberdeen: FRLSU.Google Scholar
Iosad, Pavel, Ramsammy, Michael, & Honeybone, Patrick. 2015. Preaspiration in North Argyll Gaelic and its contribution to prosodic structure. Paper presented at the Forum for Research on the Languages of Scotland and Ulster held at the University of the West of Scotland, Ayr Campus, UK, August 12–14, 2015. Available at https://www.anghyflawn.net/viewer/web/viewer.html?file=%2Fpdf%2ffrlsu2015.handout.pdf, accessed on December 4, 2021.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K., & Salmons, Joseph C.. 1995. Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic. Phonology 12. 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Haike. 1993. La palatalisation gallo-romane et la représentation des traits distinctifs. Architecture des représentations phonologiques, ed. by Laks, Bernard & Rialland, Annie, 147–171. Paris: CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Fant, Gunnar, & Halle, Morris. 1952. Preliminaries to speech analysis. The distinctive features and their correlates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, & Lotz, John. 1949. Notes on the French phonemic pattern. Word. Journal of the International Linguistic Association 5. 151–158.Google Scholar
Jensen, Sean. 1994. Is ʔ an element? Towards a non-segmental phonology. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 4. 71–78.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan. 1990. ‘Coda’ licensing. Phonology 7. 301–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan. 1992. Do you believe in magic? The story of s+c sequences. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 2. 293–313.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Lowenstamm, Jean, & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1990. Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology 7. 193–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keer, Edward. 2000. Icelandic preaspiration and the moraic theory of geminates. The Nordic Languages and modern linguistics 10: Proceedings of the Xth Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, ed. by Thorhallsdóttir, Gudrún, 145–156. Reykjavík: Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Kingston, John. 1990. Articulatory binding. Papers in laboratory phonology, vol. 1, ed. by Kingston, John & Mary, E. Beckman, 406–434. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitto, Catherine, & De Lacy, Paul. 1999. Correspondence and epenthetic quality. AFLA VI: Proceedings of the sixth Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 16), ed. by Smallwood, Caroline & Kitto, Catherine, 181–200. Toronto, ON: Linguistics Graduate Course Union at the University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, Jerzy. 1948. Contribution à la théorie de la syllabe. Bulletin de la Société Polonaise de Linguistique 8. 80–104 Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1984. Phonology: An introduction to basic concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lockwood, William B. 1964. An introduction to modern Faroese. Tórshavn: Føroya Skúlabókagrunnur.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 1981. On the maximal cluster approach to syllable structure. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 575–604.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1996. Phonetic universals. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 92. 160–178.Google Scholar
Miller, Wick R., Elzinga, Dirk, & McLaughlin, John E.. 2005. Preaspiration and gemination in central Numic 1. International Journal of American Linguistics 71. 413–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miret, Fernando Sanchez. 1998. Some reflections on the notion of diphthong. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 34. 27–51.Google Scholar
Nasukawa, Kuniya. 2011. Representing phonology without precedence relations. English Linguistics 28. 278–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasukawa, Kuniya. 2015a. Features and recursive structure. Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language and Linguistics 41. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasukawa, Kuniya. 2015b. Recursion in the lexical structure of morphemes. Representing structure in phonology and syntax (Studies in Generative Grammar 124), ed. by van Oostendorp, Marc & van Riemsdijk, Henk, 211–238. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasukawa, Kuniya. 2016. A precedence-free approach to (de-)palatalisation in Japanese. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1. 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onuma, Hitomi. 2015. On the status of empty nuclei in phonology. Sendai, Japan: University Tohoku Gakuin dissertation.Google Scholar
Petersen, Hjalmar P. 2010. Jakobsen’s Faroese orthography from 1889. Jakob Jakobsen in Shetland and the Faroes, ed. by Sigurðardóttir, Turið & Smith, Brian, 47–66. Tórshavn: Shetland Amenity Trust and the University of the Faroe Islands.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E., & Lehiste, Ilse. 1960. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32. 693–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pétursson, Magnús. 1972. La préaspiration en islandais moderne. Examen de sa réalisation phonétique chez deux sujets. Studia Linguistica 26. 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pind, Jörgen. 1995. Constancy and normalization in the perception of voice offset time as a cue for preaspiration. Acta Psychologica 89. 53–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pöchtrager, Markus A. 2006. The structure of length. Vienna, Austria: University of Vienna dissertation.Google Scholar
Pöchtrager, Markus A. 2015. Binding in phonology. Representing structure in phonology and syntax (Studies in Generative Grammar 124), ed. by van Oostendorp, Marc & van Riemsdijk, Henk, 255–276. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöchtrager, Markus A. 2018. Sawing off the branch you are sitting on. Acta Linguistica Academica 65. 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringen, Catherine O. 1999. Aspiration, preaspiration, deaspiration, sonorant devoicing and spirantization in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22. 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schane, Sanford A. 1984. The fundamentals of particle phonology. Phonology yearbook, vol. 1, ed. by Anderson, John & Ewen, Colin, 129–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 1999. A theory of consonantal interaction. Folia Linguistica 32. 201–237.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth, O. 1981. English compounding and the theory of word structure. The scope of lexical rules (Linguistic Models 1), ed. by Moortgat, Michael, Van der Hulst, Harry, & Hoestra, Teun, 229–277. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður. 1990. Nokkur orð um aðblástur, fráblástur og afröddun í íslensku [Some notes on preaspiration, postaspiration and devoicing in Icelandic]. Íslenskt Mál Og Almenn Málfræði 10/11. 130–137.Google Scholar
Silverman, Daniel. 2003. On the rarity of pre-aspirated stops. Journal of Linguistics 39. 575–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staroverov, Petr. 2014. Splitting theory and consonant epenthesis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University dissertation.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1997. Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal Neutralization . Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles. Available at http://lingphil.mit.edu/papers/steriade/steriade1997Laryng.pdf, accessed on December 4, 2021.Google Scholar
Stevens, Mary, & Hajek, John. 2007. Towards a phonetic conspectus of preaspiration: Acoustic evidence from Sienese Italian. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (ICPhS XVI), ed. by Trouvain, Jürgen & William, J. Barry, 429–432. Saarbrücken: Saarland University.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1978. On the phonology of Icelandic preaspiration. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 1. 3–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Petersen, Hjalmar P., Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon, & Hansen, Zakaris S.. 2012. Faroese: An overview and reference grammar. Tórshavn: Føroya Fróðskaparfelag.Google Scholar
Tifrit, Ali. 2012. Epenthèse et Principe de Projection Elargi. Paper presented at the 10ème rencontre du Réseau Français de Phonologie (RFP 10), June 2012, Paris, France. Université Paris 8, CNRS. Available at https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01057055/document.Google Scholar
Voeltzel, Laurence. 2016. Morphophonologie des langues scandinaves. Hiérarchie segmentale et complexité syllabique [Morphophonology of Scandinavian languages. Segmental hierarchy and syllabic complexity]. Nantes, France: University of Nantes dissertation.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Samuel A., & Sapon, Stanley M.. 1958. Note on vowel duration seen crosslinguistically. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 30. 152–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar