We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Co- and Subordination in German and Other Languages. Edited by Ingo Reich & Augustin Speyer. (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 21.) Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag GmbH, 2016. Pp 345. Paperback. €68.
Review products
Co- and Subordination in German and Other Languages. Edited by Ingo Reich & Augustin Speyer. (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 21.) Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag GmbH, 2016. Pp 345. Paperback. €68.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
15 April 2019
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Featherston, Sam. 2009. A scale for measuring well-formedness: Why syntax needs boiling and freezing points. The fruits of empirical linguistics, vol. 1: Process, ed. by Featherston, Sam & Winkler, Susanne, 47–74. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2002. On the force of V2 declaratives. Theoretical Linguistics28. 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2010. The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua120. 628–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B., & Thompson, Sandra A.. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry4. 465–498.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 2011. Clause structure folding and the “wh-in-situ effect”. Linguistic Inquiry42. 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. Elements of grammar, ed. by Haegeman, Liliane, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speyer, Augustin. 2011. Je stärker der Fokus, desto geringer die Einbettung? Zum Status des je-Satzes in je-desto-Gefügen. Linguistische Berichte225. 43–61.Google Scholar