Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:07:26.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dislocated sequences and word order in French: a processing approach*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

L. Kathy Heilenman  and
Janet L. McDonald
L. Kathy Heilenman
Affiliation:
Department of French and Italian, University of Iowa, 31 Schaeffer Hall, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
Janet L. McDonald
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reports the results of three studies dealing with dislocated sequences in French. A text count of written and spoken French reveals that word order is not entirely free in these sequences but instead obeys certain constraints. Two studies then investigate the use of cues (word order, clitic pronoun type, clitic pronoun agreement and animacy) in the interpretation of dislocated sequences by native speakers of French. Results indicate that the constraints found in the text count, with minor modifications, are also operative in processing.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , September 1993 , pp. 165 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrivé, M., Gadet, F. and Galmiche, M. (1986). La Grammaire d'aujourd'hui: guide alphabétique de linguistique française. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Ashby, W. J. (1988). The syntax, pragmatics and sociolinguistics of left- and right-dislocations in French. Lingua, 75: 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, R. V. (1983). Noun, pronoun and discourse structure in French. Modern Languages 64: 229–239.Google Scholar
Barnes, B. K. (1985). The Pragmatics of Left Detachment in Spoken Standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, E. and Gleitman, L. R. (eds.), Language Acquisition: the State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation and language learning. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, B. and Bates, E. (eds.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C., Deulofeu, J., Stéfanini, J. and Van den Eynde, K. (1987). Pronom et syntaxe: l'approche pronominale et son application au français. Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C. and Jeanjean, C. (1987). Le Français parlé. Paris: Didier-Erudition.Google Scholar
Calvé, P. (1982). Un trait du frané authentique: la dislocation. Bulletin de l'ACLA (Association canadienne de linguistique appliquée), 4: 25–44.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. (1982). Redoublement et dislocations en français populaire. In Lefebvre, C. (ed.), La Syntaxe comparée du français standard et populaire: approches formelle et fonctionnelle, vol. i. Québec: Office de la langue françhise.Google Scholar
Charvillat, A. and Kail, M. (1991). The status of ‘canonical SVO sentences’ in French: a developmental study of the on-line processing of dislocated sentences. Journal of Child Language, 18: 591–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosnier, J. and Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1987). Décrire la conversation. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.Google Scholar
de Fornel, M. (1988). Constructions disloquées, mouvement thématique et organisation préférentielle dans la conversation. Langue Française, 78: 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fradin, B. (1990). Approche des constructions à détachement: inventaire. Revue Romane 25: 3–34.Google Scholar
Gadet, F. (1989). Le Français ordinaire. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1991). From V/2 to subject clitics: Evidence from Northern Italian. In Traugott, E. and Heine, B. (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. ii: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1988). French. In Harris, M. and Vincent, N. (eds.), The Romance Languages. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Heilenman, L. K. and McDonald, J. L. (in press). Processing strategies in L2 learners of French: the role of transfer. Langage Learning.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. (1991). The development of discourse cohesion: some functional and cross-linguistic issues. In Bonniec, G. Piéeraut-Le and Dolitsky, M. (eds.), Language Bases … Discourse Bases: Some Aspects of Contemporary French-language Psycholinguistics Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hudelot, C. (1991). Comment se manifeste la familiarité des interlocuteurs dans des dialogues adulte-enfants. In Russier, C., Stoffel, H. and Véronique, D. (eds.), Interactions en langue étrangére. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l'Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Hulk, A. (1991). Les pronoms clitiques sujets et la théorie linguistique. In Actes du xviiie Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes, 1986, vol. ii. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hupet, M. and Kreit, B. (1983). L'articulation d'informations ‘connue’ and ‘nouvelle’ dans le language d'enfants de trois à douze ans. Archives de Psychologie, 51: 189–204.Google Scholar
Judge, A. and Healey, F. G. (1985). A Reference Grammar of Modern French. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Kail, M. (1989). Cue validity, cue cost, and processing types in sentence comprehension in French and Spanish. In MacWhinney, B. and Bates, E. (eds.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kail, M. and Charvillat, A. (1986). Linguistic cues in sentence processing in French children and adults from a crosslinguistic perspective. In Kurcz, I., Shugar, G. and Danks, J. (eds.), Knowledge and Language. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Kail, M. and Charvillat, A. (1988). Local and topological processing in sentence comprehension by French and Spanish children. Journal of Child Language, 15: 637–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambrecht, K. (1987). On the status of SVO sentences in French discourse. In Tomlin, R. S. (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1988). Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In Haiman, J. and Thompson, S.A. (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Le Bidois, R. (1968). 'Le parfum, j'aime!'. Le Monde, 6 November: 16.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. and Bates, E. (eds.) (1989). The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E. and Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23: 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Pleh, C. and Bates, E. (1985). The development of sentence interpretation in Hungarian. Cognitive Psychology, 17: 178–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, S. J. (1989). French in flux: typological shift and sociolinguistic variation. In Walsh, T. J. (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1988. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (1986). The development of sentence comprehension strategies in English and Dutch. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41: 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (1987). Assigning linguistic roles: the influence of conflicting cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 26: 100–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L. and Heilenman, L. K. (1991). Determinants of cue strength in adult first and second language speakers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12: 313–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L. and Heilenman, L. K. (1992). Changes in sentence processing as second language proficiency increases. In Harris, R. J. (ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Melis, L. (1991). Le français, une langue à sujet nul? Les pronoms personnels sujet en français et la syntaxe des langues romanes. In Actes du xviiie Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes, 1986, vol. ii. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Moreau, M.-L. (1987). L'ordre des constituants dans la production orale entre familiers. Travaux de linguistique, 14/15: 47–65.Google Scholar
Ossipov, H. (1990). A GPSG analysis of doubling and dislocation constructions in French. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Pohl, J. (1976). Les constructions about-pronom sujet-verbe dans le français contemporain. In Boudreault, M. and Möhrer, F. (eds.), Actes du xiiie Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romane, vol. i. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Prince, E. F. (1981). Topicalization, focus movement and Yiddish movement: a pragmatic differentiation. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 7: 249–264.Google Scholar
Roberge, Y. (1990). The Syntactic Recoverability of Null Arguments. Kingston and Montreal: McGill–Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, G. (1982). Usage linguistique et grammaticalisation: les clitiques sujets en français. In Dittmar, N. and Schlieben-Lange, B. (eds.), La Sociolinguistique dans les pays de langue romane. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Sempé, J.-J. and Goscinny, R. (1987). Les Récrés du petit Nicolas. Paris: Denoël.Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. (1988). Word Order Rules. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Stempel, W-D. (1981). ‘L'amour, elle appelle ça’, ‘L'amour tu ne connais pas’. In Rohrer, C. (ed.), Logos Semantikos: Studio linguistica in honorem Eugenio Coseriu 1921–1981, vol. iv. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sueur, J.-P. (1990). Sur la syntaxe du récit oral. Linguisticae Investigationes, 14: 95–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesnière, L. (1965). Elémentes de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Vion, M. (1992). The role of intonation in processing left and right dislocations in French. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 53: 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartburg, W. (1963). Problèmes et méthodes de la linguistique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar