Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:11:57.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competing repair strategies for word-final obstruent-liquid clusters in northern metropolitan French

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2021

Joshua M. Griffiths
Joshua M. Griffiths*
Affiliation:
Northeastern University
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

French licenses word-final obstruent-liquid clusters (table /tabl/; souffre /sufʁ/). These clusters may be realised faithfully resulting in an apparent violation of the sonority sequencing principle (Clements, 1990). Yet, the clusters can also be repaired in one of two ways: (1) through the reduction of the cluster (i.e. [tab]) or (2) through the epenthesis of a schwa vowel, resyllabifying the cluster into the onset position (i.e. [ta.blə].) In this article, I investigate which factors condition the realisation of word-final obstruent-liquid clusters. The results are formalised in Maximum Entropy Grammar (Goldwater and Johnson, 2003), but evidence for effects of style and speaker age require the scaling of several constraints (Coetzee and Kawahara, 2013). This study sheds light on these curious clusters, while raising new questions about the interaction of grammatical and non-grammatical factors.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 1 - 24
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bayles, A., Kaplan, A., and Kaplan, A. (2016). Inter- and intra-speaker variation in French schwa. Glossa, 1.1: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. and Hayes, B. (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry, 32.1: 45–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. and Weenink, D. (2020). Praat: Doing phonetics by Computer. Version 6.1.16. URL: http://fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.Google Scholar
Boughton, Z. (2015). Social class, cluster simplification and following context: Sociolinguistic variation in word-final post-obstruent liquid deletion in French. Journal of French Language Studies, 25.1: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2003). Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In: Kingston, J. and Beckman, M. E. (eds), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 283–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, A. W. (2016). A comprehensive model of phonological variation: Grammatical and non-grammatical factors in variable nasal place assimilation. Phonology, 33.2: 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, A. W. and Kawahara, S. (2013). Frequency biases in phonological variation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31.1: 47–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, A. W. and Pater, J. (2011). The place of variation in phonological theory. In: Goldsmith, J., Riggle, J., and Yu, A. C. L. (eds), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 401–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L. and Steele, J. (2005) Liquid asymmetries in French and Spanish. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 24.Google Scholar
Côté, M-H. (2000). Consonant Cluster Phonotactics. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Côté, M-H. (2004). Consonant cluster simplification in Québec French. Probus, 16:151–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, F. (1973). Les règles et les sons. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Dell, F. (1976). Schwa précédé d’un groupe obstruante-liquide. Recherches linguistiques, 4: 75–111.Google Scholar
Durand, J. (1976). Generative phonology, dependency phonology and Southern French. Lingua e stile, 11.1, 3–23.Google Scholar
Durand, J. and Eychenne, J. (2007). Remarks on schwa deletion and epenthesis in French. In: Crouzet, O. and Angoujard, J.-P. (eds), Actes des 5èmes journées d’études linguistiques, pp. 89–94.Google Scholar
Durand, J., Laks, B., and Lyche, C. (2002). La phonologie du français contemporain : Usages, variétés, et structures. In: Pusch, C. D. and Raible, W. (eds), Romanistische korpuslinguistik korpora und gesprochenesprache, Tübingen: Narr, pp. 93–106. https://www.projet-pfc.net.Google Scholar
Durand, J., Laks, B., and Lyche, C. (2009). Le projet PFC (phonologie du français contemporain) : Une source de données primaires structures. In: Durand, J., Laks, B., and Lyche, C. (eds), Phonologie, variation et accents du français, Paris: Hermès, pp. 19–61.Google Scholar
Eychenne, J. (2006). Aspects de la phonologie du schwa dans le français contemporain : Optimalité, visibilité prosodique, gradience. PhD thesis: Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail.Google Scholar
Fouché, P. (1959). Traité de pronunciation française. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Goldwater, S. and Johnson, M. (2003). Learning OT constraint rankings using a maximum entropy model. In: Spenader, J., Eriksson, A. and Dahl, Ö. (eds), Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on Variation within Optimality Theory, pp. 111–120.Google Scholar
Grammont, M. (1894). La loi des trois consonnes. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 8: 53–90.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. M. to appear. Augmenting the Projet Phonologie du Français Contemporain Corpus: A Case Study of Schwa Realization. To appear in: Howe, L. C., Gupton, T., Renwick, M. E. L., and Chamorro, P. (eds), Proceedings of the 49th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Hannahs, S. J. (2009). Welsh Svarabhakti: sonority sequencing and foot structure. Journal of Celtic Linguistics, 13: 21–44.Google Scholar
Itô, J. and Mester, A. (2001). Covert generalization in Optimality Theory: The role of stratal faithfulness constraints. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology, 7: 273–299.Google Scholar
Kemp, W., Pupier, P., and Yaeger, M. (1980). A linguistic and social description of final consonant cluster simplification in Montréal French. In: Shuy, R. and Shunkal, A. (eds), Languages and the Uses of Language. Washington: Georgetown University Press, pp. 12–40.Google Scholar
Laks, B. (1977). Contribution empirique à l’analyse socio-différentielle de la chute de /R/ dans les groupes consonantiques finals. Langue française, 34: 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laks, B. and Durand, J. (2000). Relire les phonologues du français : Maurice Grammont et la loi des trois consonnes. Langue française, 126: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdale, D. and Le Bras, Y. (2009). A Frequency Dictionary of French: Core Vocabulary for Learners. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyche, C. (1993). Quelques remarques sur le groupe OL en français. Revue Romane 28.2: 195–217.Google Scholar
Malécot, A. (1974). Frequency of occurrence of French phonemes and consonant clusters. Phonetica, 29.3: 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, P. (2013). The relationship between schwa insertion and consonant cluster simplification in French: An analysis of covariance. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. 19:1: 123–128.Google Scholar
Pater, J. (2016). Universal grammar with weighted constraints. In: McCarthy, J. J. and Pater, J. (eds), Harmonic Grammar and Harmonic Serialism, London: Equinox Publishing, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL: https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Ripley, B., Venables, W., and Ripley, M. B. (2016). Package ‘nnet’. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nnet/nnet.pdf, retrieved 3 June 2019.Google Scholar
Shih, S. (2017). Constraint conjunction in weighted probabilistic grammar. Phonology, 34.2: 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Oostendorp, M. (1997). Style levels in conflict resolution. In: Hinskens, F., van Hout, R., and Wetzels, L. (eds), Variation, Change, and Phonological Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, H. (1988). Le français dans tous les sens. Paris: Robert Laffont.Google Scholar
Webb, E. R. (2009). Minimalism and French /R/: Phonological representations in phonetically based phonology. Journal of French Language Studies, 19.1: 87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wioland, F. (1985). Les structures syllabiques du français : Fréquence et distribution des phonèmes consonantiques, contraintes idiomatiques dans les séquences consonantiques. Geneva: Slatkine.Google Scholar
Wu, Y. (2018). Etude de la reduction segmentale en français parlé à travers différents styles: Apports des grands corpus et du traitement automatique de la parole à l’étude du schwa, du /ʁ/ et des reductions à segments multiples. PhD thesis, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3.Google Scholar