We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Brigitte L. M. Bauer, The Emergence and Development of SVO Patterning in Latin and French: Diachronic and Psycholinguistic Perspectives. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, xvi + 242 pp. 0 19 509103 5
Review products
Brigitte L. M. Bauer, The Emergence and Development of SVO Patterning in Latin and French: Diachronic and Psycholinguistic Perspectives. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, xvi + 242 pp. 0 19 509103 5
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
10 October 2008
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bichakjian, B. H. (1988) Evolution in Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G., Fraser, N. M. and McGlashan, S., (eds.), (1993) Heads in Grammatical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, A-M. and Williams, E. (1987) On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, M. B. (1978) The Evolution of French Syntax. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1983) Word Order Universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1990) A parsing theory of word order universals. Linguistic Inquiry, 21: 223–61.Google Scholar
Schwegler, A. (1990) Analyticity and Syntheticity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. B. (1982) Consistency, markedness and language change. Journal of Linguistics, 17: 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwanenburg, W. (1992) Morphological heads, French ‘compounding’ and Germanic ‘prefixation’. In: Laeufer, C. and Morgan, T. A. (eds.), Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 167–79.Google Scholar