Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T18:05:04.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vortex multipoles in two-layer rotating shallow-water flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2002

JEAN-MICHEL BAEY
Affiliation:
ATLANTIDE, Brest, France
XAVIER CARTON
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique des Océans, IFREMER, Brest, France

Abstract

The stability of elliptically perturbed circular vortices is investigated in a two-layer shallow-water model, with constant background rotation. The fluid is bounded above and below by rigid and at surfaces. The linear stability analysis shows that elliptical perturbations are most unstable for moderate Burger numbers and vorticity shears. Shorter waves dominate for more sheared vortices. Shallow-water and quasi-geostrophic growth rates exhibit a striking similarity, except at each end of the Burger number domain. There, cyclones (anticyclones) with finite Rossby numbers are more (less) unstable than their quasi-geostrophic counterparts. A simple model gives a first-order trend for this bias.

Nonlinear model runs with initially perturbed vortices also show the similarity between the two dynamics. In these runs, elliptically deformed vortices stabilize as stationary rotating tripoles for moderate linear instability; on the other hand, strongly unstable vortices break as dipoles. During these nonlinear processes, energy transfers indicate that barotropic instability is at least as active as the baroclinic one. For tripole formation, the modal analysis of the perturbation exhibits a dominant contribution of the original wave and of the mean flow correction. The ageostrophic and divergent parts of the flow are respectively weak and negligible. The Lighthill equation proves that few internal gravity waves are generated during tripole formation or dipolar breaking. Finally, the effects of triangular perturbations on circular vortices and the formation of quadrupoles are briefly addressed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)