Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-6rp8b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-02T14:37:07.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vortex formation of a finite-span synthetic jet: effect of rectangular orifice geometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2014

Tyler Van Buren ,
Edward Whalen  and
Michael Amitay
Tyler Van Buren
Affiliation:
Mechanical, Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA
Edward Whalen
Affiliation:
Boeing Research and Technology, Hazelwood, MO 63042, USA
Michael Amitay*
Affiliation:
Mechanical, Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The formation and evolution of flow structures of a finite-span synthetic jet issuing into a quiescent flow were investigated experimentally using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (SPIV). The effect of two geometrical parameters, the orifice aspect ratio and the neck length, were explored at a Strouhal number of 0.115 and a Reynolds number of 615. Normalized orifice neck lengths of 2, 4 and 6 and aspect ratios of 6, 12, and 18 were examined. It was found that the effect of the aspect ratio is much larger than the effect of the neck length, and as the aspect ratio increases the size of the edge vortices decreases and the presence of secondary structures is more evident. Moreover, axis switching was observed and its streamwise location increases as the aspect ratio increases. The effect of the neck length on the flow structures and the evolution of the synthetic jet was found to be secondary, where the effect was only in the very near field (i.e. close to the jet’s orifice).

JFM classification

Wakes/Jets: Jets Wakes/Jets: Wakes/Jets Vortex Flows: Vortex Flows
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 745 , 25 April 2014 , pp. 180 - 207
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrian, R. & Westerweel, J. 2011 Particle Image Velocimetry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Amitay, M. & Cannelle, F. 2006 Evolution of finite span synthetic jets. Phys. Fluids 18 (5), 054101.Google Scholar
Amitay, M., Honohan, A. M., Trautman, M. & Glezer, A.1997 Modification of the aerodynamic characteristics of bluff bodies using fluidic actuators 28th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference. 10.2514/6. AIAA Paper 1997-2004.Google Scholar
Amitay, M., Kibens, V., Parekh, D. E. & Glezer, A.1999 Flow reattachment dynamics over a thick airfoil controlled by synthetic jet actuators. 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. 10.2514/6. AIAA Paper 1999-1001.Google Scholar
Amitay, M., Smith, D. R., Kibens, V., Parekh, D. E. & Glezer, A. 2001 Modification of the aerodynamics characteristics of an unconventional airfoil using synthetic jet actuators. AIAA J. 39, 361–370.Google Scholar
Carpy, S. & Manceau, R. 2006 Turbulence modeling of statistically periodic flows: synthetic jets into quiescent air. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 27, 756–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crighton, D. G. 1973 Instability of an elliptic jet. J. Fluid Mech. 59, 665–672.Google Scholar
Crook, A., Sadri, A. M. & Wood, N. J. 1999 The development and implementation of synthetic jets for the control of separated flow. In 17th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Norfolk, Virginia AIAA.Google Scholar
Cui, J. & Agarwal, R. K. 2006 Three-dimensional computation of a synthetic jet in quiescent air. AIAA J. 44 (12), 2857–2865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanak, M. R. & Bernardinis, B. 1981 The evolution of an elliptic vortex ring. J. Fluid Mech. 109, 189–216.Google Scholar
Elimelech, Y., Vasile, J. D. & Amitay, M. 2011 Secondary flow structures due to interaction between a finite-span synthetic jet and a 3-D cross flow. Phys. Fluids 23 (9), 0941041–13.Google Scholar
Fischer, C., Sharma, R. N. & Mallinson, G. D. 2010 Flow visualisation to identify mechanisms leading to axis-switching of slotted synthetic jets. In 17th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Gallas, Q., Holman, R., Nishida, T., Carroll, B., Sheplak, M. & Cattafesta, L. 2003 Lumped element modeling of piezoelectric-driven synthetic jet actuators. AIAA J. 41 (2), 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glezer, A. & Amitay, M. 2002 Synthetic jets. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 503–529.Google Scholar
Gutmark, E. J. & Grinstein, F. F. 1999 Flow contol with noncircular jets. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31, 239–272.Google Scholar
Holman, R., Utturkar, Y., Mittal, R., Smith, B. & Cattafesta, L. 2005 Formation criterion for synthetic jets. AIAA J. 43 (10), 2110–2115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Wray, A. A. & Moin, P. 1988 Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. In Center for Turbulence Research Report CTR–S88, pp. 193–207. Stanford University.Google Scholar
Ingard, U. & Labate, S. 1950 Acoustic circulation effects and the nonlinear impedance of orifices. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22, 211–218.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. H. & Garry, K. P. 2012 Time dependent analysis of a rectangular synthetic jet. In 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, 23–28 September, 2012, Brisbane, Australia International Congress of Aeronautical Sciences.Google Scholar
Krishnan, G. & Kamran, M. 2009 An experimental and analytical investigation of rectangular synthetic jets. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 131, 1–11.Google Scholar
Krothapalli, A., Baganoff, D. & Karamcheti, K. 1980 On the mixing of a rectangular jet. J. Fluid Mech. 107, 201–220.Google Scholar
Lee, C. Y. & Goldstein, D. B. 2002 Two-dimensional synthetic jet simulation. AIAA J. 40 (3), 510–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, S. & Soo, J. H. 2004 Simulation of vortex dynamics in three-dimensional synthetic and free jets using the large-eddy lattice Boltzmann method. J. Turbul. 5, 1–26.Google Scholar
Sahni, O., Wood, J., Jansen, K. E. & Amitay, M. 2011 Three-dimensional interactions between a finite-span synthetic jet and a cross flow at a low Reynolds number and angle of attack. J. Fluid Mech. 671, 254–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeley, C. E., Utturkar, Y., Arik, M. & Iconz, T. 2011 Fluid–structure interaction model for low-frequency synthetic jets. AIAA J. 49 (2), 316–323.Google Scholar
Sharma, R. N. 2006 An analytical model for synthetic jet actuation. In 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference, San Francisco, California AIAA.Google Scholar
Siefert, A. & Pack, L. G. 1999 Oscillatory control of separation at high Reynolds numbers. AIAA J. 37, 1062–1071.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L. & Glezer, A. 1998 The formation and evolution of synthetic jets. Phys. Fluids 10 (9), 2281–2297.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L. & Glezer, A. 2002 Jet vectoring using synthetic jets. J. Fluid Mech. 458, 1–34.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L. & Swift, G. W. 2003 A comparison between synthetic jets and continuous jets. Experiments in Fluids 34, 467–472.Google Scholar
Tsuchiya, Y., Horikoshi, C. & Sato, T. 1986 On the spread of rectangular jets. Exp. Fluids 4, 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Buren, T., Whalen, E. & Amitay, M. 2012 Vortex formation of a finite span synthetic jet. In 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nashville, Tennessee AIAA.Google Scholar
Van Buren, T., Whalen, E. & Amitay, M. 2014 Vortex formation of a finite-span synthetic jet: high Reynolds numbers. Phys. Fluids 26, 014101–014121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar