Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T03:18:09.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vertical dispersion of model microorganisms in horizontal shear flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2012

Takuji Ishikawa
Takuji Ishikawa*
Affiliation:
Department of Bioengineering and Robotics, Tohoku University, 6-6-01, Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Microorganisms often swim upwards due to the cell’s phototaxis, chemotaxis or geotaxis, in flow fields with vertical velocity gradients. In this study, the vertical dispersion of model microorganisms was investigated under horizontal shear conditions. A microorganism was modelled as a spherical squirmer with or without bottom-heaviness. First, the three-dimensional movement of 100 identical squirmers in a homogeneous suspension was computed by the Stokesian dynamics method. The results show that the dispersion of squirmers is strongly affected by the swimming velocity and bottom-heaviness of the cells and the shear rate of the background flow. The vertical diffusion is considerably smaller than the horizontal diffusion. Interestingly, the vertical diffusion decreases as the volume fraction and the stresslet of squirmers decrease, which is opposite of the tendency in diffusion with no background flow. Next, a continuum model of a suspension of squirmers was developed using the diffusion tensor and the drift velocity to simulate the spatial distribution of squirmers in macroscopic flow fields. The results of the continuum model illustrate that the gyrotactic trapping found by Durham, Kessler & Stocker (Science, vol. 323, 2009, pp. 1067–1070) also appears in the present model considering cell–cell hydrodynamic interactions. In the case of horizontal Poiseuille flow, the volume fraction of bottom-heavy cells in the channel becomes considerably larger than that at the inlet. These fundamental findings are helpful for understanding the distribution of microorganisms in various water regimes in nature and industry.

JFM classification

Biological Fluid Dynamics: Micro-organism dynamics Complex Fluids: Suspensions Biological Fluid Dynamics: Swimming/flying
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 705: Special issue dedicated to Professor T. J. Pedley on his 70th birthday , 25 August 2012 , pp. 98 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Banchio, A. J. & Brady, J. F. 2003 Accelerated Stokesian dynamics: Brownian motion. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 10323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bearon, R. N., Hazel, A. L. & Thorn, G. J. 2011 The spatial distribution of gyrotactic swimming micro-organisms in laminar flow fields. J. Fluid Mech. 680, 602–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Beenakker, C. W. J. 1986 Ewald sum of the Rotne–Prager tensor. J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1581–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Berg, H. C. 1983 Random Walks in Biology. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
5. Brady, J. F. & Morris, J. F. 1997 Microstructure of strongly sheared suspensions and its impact on rheology and diffusion. J. Fluid Mech. 348, 103–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Childress, S., Levandowsky, M. & Spiegel, E. A. 1975 Pattern formation in a suspension of swimming micro-organisms: equations and stability theory. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Drazer, G., Koplik, J., Khusid, B. & Acrivos, A. 2002 Deterministic and stochastic behaviour of non-Brownian spheres in sheared suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 460, 307–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Durham, W. M., Kessler, J. O. & Stocker, R. 2009 Disruption of vertical motility by shear triggers formation of thin phytoplankton layers. Science 323, 1067–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Durham, W. M., Climent, E. & Stocker, R. 2011 Gyrotaxis in a steady vortical flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 238102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Fåhræus, R. 1929 The suspension stability of the blood. Physiol. Rev. 9, 241–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Foss, D. & Brady, J. F. 1999 Self-diffusion in sheared suspensions by dynamic simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 401, 243–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Foss, D. & Brady, J. F. 2000 Structure, diffusion and rheology of Brownian suspensions by Stokesian Dynamics simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 407, 167–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hill, N. A. & Häder, D.-P. 1997 A biased random walk model for the trajectories of swimming micro-organisms. J. Theor. Biol. 186, 503–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Ishikawa, T., Simmonds, M. P. & Pedley, T. J. 2006 Hydrodynamic interaction of two swimming model micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 568, 119–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Ishikawa, T. & Pedley, T. J. 2007 Diffusion of swimming model micro-organisms in a semi-dilute suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 588, 437–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Ishikawa, T., Locsei, J. T. & Pedley, T. J. 2008 Development of coherent structures in concentrated suspensions of swimming model micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 615, 401–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Ishikawa, T. & Yamaguchi, T. 2008 Shear-induced fluid-tracer diffusion in a semi-dilute suspension of spheres. Phys. Rev. E 77, 041402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Kessler, J. O. 1986 The external dynamics of swimming micro-organisms. In Progress in Phycological Research (ed. Round, F. E. & Chapman, D. J. ), vol. 4, pp. 257–307. Biopress.Google Scholar
19. Leonard, B. P. 1979 A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 19, 59–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Marchioro, M. & Acrivos, A. 2001 Shear-induced particle diffusivities from numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 443, 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Morris, J. F. & Brady, J. F. 1996 Self-diffusion in sheared suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 312, 223–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Sierou, A. & Brady, J. F. 2004 Shear-induced self-diffusion in non-colloidal suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 506, 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Vladimirov, V. A. et al. 2000 Algal motility measured by a laser-based tracking method. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 51, 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Vladimirov, V. A. et al. 2004 Measurement of cell velocity distributions in populations of motile algae. J. Expl Biol. 207, 1203–1216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Wang, Y., Murai, R. & Acrivos, A. 1998 Transverse Shear-induced gradient diffusion in a dilute suspension of spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 357, 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar