Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:26:43.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turbulent flow with wavy permeable boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

R. T. Ho  and
L. W. Gelhar
R. T. Ho
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
L. W. Gelhar
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of a wavy permeable boundary on turbulent flow are investigated theoretically and experimentally, mainly in terms of the pressure distribution along the wavy boundary and the friction factors. A simplified theoretical analysis based on potential flow theory and a linear Darcy equation shows that the perturbations of the flow field have a phase shift relative to the wavy surface and that, owing to this phase shift, there results a net form resistance on the wavy surface. Experiments were conducted in two pipelines with different sizes of granular material lining the inside of the pipe walls. The diameter of the porous conduits varied sinusoidally. The experimental results show that there is a phase shift between the boundary wave form and the pressure distribution and that friction factors increase with Reynolds number even though the flow is within the normal fully rough regime.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , 17 April 1973 , pp. 403 - 414
Copyright
© 1973 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, T. B. 1959 Shearing flow over a wavy boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 161–205.Google Scholar
Chu, Y. S. & Gelhar, L. W. 1972 Turbulent pipe flow with granular permeable boundaries. Ralph M. Parsons Lab. for Water Resources & Hydrodynamics, M.I.T. Rep. no. 148.Google Scholar
Eckert, E. R. G., Diaguila, A. J. & Donougiie, P. L. 1955 Experiments on turbulent flow through channels having porous rough surfaces with and without air injection. N.A.C.A. Tech. Kote, no. 3349.Google Scholar
Hsu, S. T. 1968 Turbulent flow in wavy pipes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Iowa.
Hsu, S. T. & Kennedy, F. F. 1971 Turbulent flow in wavy pipes. J. Fluid Mech. 47, 481–5021 .Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. F. 1963 The mechanics of dunes and antidunes in erodible-bed channels. J. Fluid Mech. 16, 521–44.Google Scholar
Lovera, F. & Kennedy, J. F. 1969 Friction factors for flat bed flows in sand channels. J. Hydraul. Div. A.S.C.E. 95, 1227–34.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1957 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 185–204.Google Scholar
Motzfeld, H. 1937 Die Turbulente Strömung an Welligen Wanden. Z. angew. Math. Mech. 17, 193–212.Google Scholar
Munoz Goma, R. J. & Gelhar, L. W. 1968 Turbulent pipe flow with rough and porous walls. Hydrodyn. Lab., Dept. Civil Engng, M.I.T. Rep. no. 109.Google Scholar
Omen, R. M. & Eckert, E. R. G. 1966 Experimental studies of turbulent flow in a porous circular tube with uniform fluid injection through the tube wall. Trans. A.S.M.E., J. Appl. Mech. E 33, 7–17.Google Scholar
Raudkivi, A. J. 1967 Analysis of resistance in fluvial channels. J. Hydraul. Div. A.S.C.E., no. HY 5, 78–84.Google Scholar
Siyons, D. G. & Richardson, E. V. 1960 Resistance to flow in alluvial channels. J. Hydraul. Div. A.S.C.E., no. HY 5, 73–99. (See also 1962 A.S.C.E. 127. 927-54).Google Scholar
Vanoni, V. A. & Brooks, N. H. 1957 Laboratory studies of the roughness and suspended load of alluvial streams. Cal. Inst. Tech. Sedimentation Lab. Rep. no. E-68.Google Scholar
Vanoni, V. A. & Hwang, L. S. 1967 Relation between bed forms and friction in streams. J. Hydraul. Div. A.S.C.E. no. HY 3, 121–44.Google Scholar
Yuan, S. W. & Brogren, E. W. 1961 Turbulent flow in a circular pipe with porous wall. Phys. Fluids, 4, 368–72.Google Scholar