Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:10:17.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A turbulent equilibrium boundary layer near separation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Per Egil Skåre  and
Per-Åge Krogstad
Per Egil Skåre
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, Thermo and Fluid Dynamics, Norwegian Institute of Technology, N-7034 Trondheim-NTH, Norway
Per-Åge Krogstad
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, Thermo and Fluid Dynamics, Norwegian Institute of Technology, N-7034 Trondheim-NTH, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The experimental results for an equilibrium boundary layer in a strong adverse pressure gradient flow are reported. The measurements show that similarity in the mean flow and the turbulent stresses has been achieved over a substantial streamwise distance where the skin friction coefficient is kept at a low, constant level. Although the Reynolds stress distribution across the layer is entirely different from the flow at zero pressure gradient, the ratios between the different turbulent stress components were found to be similar, showing that the mechanism for distributing the turbulent energy between the different components remains unaffected by the mean flow pressure gradient. Close to the surface the gradient of the mixing length was found to increase from Kl ≈ 0.41 to Kl ≈ 0.78, almost twice as high as for the zero pressure gradient case. Similarity in the triple correlations was also found to be good. The correlations show that there is a considerable diffusion of turbulent energy from the central part of the boundary layer towards the wall. The diffusion mechanism is caused by a second peak in the turbulence production, located at y/δ ≈ 0.45. This production was for the present case almost as strong as the production found near the wall. The energy budget for the turbulent kinetic energy also shows that strong dissipation is not restricted to the wall region, but is significant for most of the layer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 272 , 10 August 1994 , pp. 319 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, S. D. & Eaton, J. K. 1989 Reynolds stress development in pressure-driven three-dimensional turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 202, 263–294.Google Scholar
Balint, J.-L., Wallace, J. M. & Vukoslavcevic, P. 1991 The velocity and vorticity vector fields of a turbulent boundary layer. Part 2. Statistical properties. J. Fluid Mech. 228, 53–86.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1967 The turbulent structure of equilibrium turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 29, 625–645.Google Scholar
Browne, L. W. B., Antonia, R. A. & Chua, L. P. 1989 Calibration of X-probes for turbulent flow measurements. Exps Fluids 7, 201–208.Google Scholar
Clauser, F. H. 1954 Turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients. J. Aero. Sci. Feb., 91–108.Google Scholar
Cockrell, D., Hill, P., Lumley, J., Morkovin, M. & Emmons, H. 1968 Report from the evaluation committee. In Proc. Computation of Turbulent Boundary Layers, AFOSR-IFP-Stanford Conference (ed. Kline, S. J., Morkovin, M. V., Sovran, G. & Cockrell, D. J.), vol. 1, pp 464–478.Google Scholar
Coles, D. E. & Hirst, E. A. 1968 Memorandum on data selection. In Proc. Computation of Turbulent Boundary Layers, AFOSR-IFP-Stanford Conference (ed. Kline, S. J., Morkovin, M. V., Sovran, G. & Cockrell, D. J.), vol. 2, pp 47–54.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. D. & Johnston, J. P. 1989 The relaxation of a turbulent boundary layer in an adverse pressure gradient. J. Fluid Mech. 200, 367–387.Google Scholar
Dengel, P. & Fernholz, H. H. 1990 An experimental investigation of an incompressible turbulent boundary layer in the vicinity of separation. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 615–636.Google Scholar
East, L. F. & Sawyer, W. G. 1979 An investigation of the structure of equilibrium turbulent boundary layers. In Turbulent Boundary Layers: Experiment Theory and Modelling, AGARD CP-271, 6.1–6.19.Google Scholar
George, W. K. & Castillo, L. 1993 Boundary layers with pressure gradient: another look at the equilibrium boundary layer. In Intl Conf. on Near-Wall Turbulent Flows (ed. So, R. M. C., Speziale, C. G. & Launder, B. E.), pp 901–910. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Glowacki, W. J. & Chi, S. W. 1972 Effect of pressure gradient on mixing length for equilibrium turbulent boundary layers. AIAA paper 72–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granville, P. S. 1976 A modified law of the wake for turbulent shear layers. J. Fluids Engng 98, 578–580.Google Scholar
Granville, P. S. 1988 Eddy viscosities and mixing lengths for turbulent boundary layers on flat plates, smooth or rough. David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, DTNSRDC-86-067.Google Scholar
Granville, P. S. 1989 A modified van Driest formula for the mixing length of turbulent boundary layers in pressure gradients. J. Fluids Engng 111, 94–97.Google Scholar
Hanjalic, K. & Launder, B. E. 1972 A Reynolds stress model of turbulence and its application to thin shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 609–638.Google Scholar
Hinze, J. O. 1975 Turbulence, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Karlsson, R. I. & Johansson, T. G. 1988 LDV measurements of higher order moments of velocity fluctuations in a turbulent boundary layer. In Laser Anemometry in Fluid Mechanics III (ed. Adrian, R. J., Asanuma, T., Durao, D. F. G., Durst, F. & Whitelaw, J. H.), pp. 273–289. Ladoan-Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisbon.Google Scholar
Klebanoff, P. S. 1955 Characteristics of turbulence in a boundary layer with zero pressure gradient. NACA Rep. 1247.Google Scholar
Kreplin, H.-P. & Eckelmann, H. 1979 Behaviour of the three fluctuating velocity components in the wall region of a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 22, 1233–1239.Google Scholar
Krogstad, P.-Å., Antonia, R. A. & Browne, L. W. B. 1992 Comparison between rough and smooth wall turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 245, 599–617.Google Scholar
Krogstad, P.-Å & SkåRE, P. E. 1993 An experimental investigation of a turbulent equilibrium boundary layer near separation. In Intl Conf. on Near-Wall Turbulent Flows (ed. So, R. M. C., Speziale, C. G. & Launder, B. E.), pp 911–920. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Launder, B. E. 1989 Second-moment closure and its use in modelling turbulent industrial flows. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 9, 963–985.Google Scholar
Li, J. D. & Perry, A. E. 1989 Shear stress profiles in zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. In 10th Australasian Fluid Mech. Conf. (ed. Perry, A. E.), University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Mellor, G. L. & Gibson, D. M. 1966 Equilibrium turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 24, 225–253.Google Scholar
Musker, A. J. 1979 Explicit expression for the smooth wall velocity distribution in a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J. 17, 655–657.Google Scholar
Nagano, Y., Tagawa, M. & Tsuji, T. 1991 Effects of adverse pressure gradients on mean flows and turbulence statistics in a boundary layer. In 8th Symp. on Turbulent Shear Flows. Munich.Google Scholar
Nash, J. F. 1965 Turbulent-boundary-layer behavior and the auxiliary equation. AGARDograph 97, 245–279.Google Scholar
Oka, S. & Kostic, Z. 1972 Influence of wall proximity on hot-wire velocity measurements. DISA Information 13, 29–33.Google Scholar
Patel, V. C. 1965 Calibration of the Preston tube and limitations on its use in pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 185–208.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E., Bell, J. B. & Joubert, P. N. 1966 Velocity and temperature profiles in adverse pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 299–320.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E., Lim, K. L. & Henbest, S. M. 1987 An experimental study of the turbulence structure in smooth- and rough-wall boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 218, 405–438.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E., Marušic, I. & Li, J. D. 1993 Recent ideas and development in the modelling of wall turbulence. In Intl Conf. on Near-Wall Turbulent Flows (ed. So, R. M. C., Speziale, C. G. & Launder, B. E.), pp 1029–1030. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Shiloh, K., Shivaprasad, B. G. & Simpson, R. L. 1981 The structure of a separating turbulent boundary layer. Part 3. Transverse velocity measurements. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 75–90.Google Scholar
Skåre, P. E. 1994 Experimental investigation of an equilibrium boundary layer in strong adverse pressure gradient. PhD thesis, University of Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
Spalart, P. R. 1988 Direct simulation of the turbulent boundary layer up to Re θ = 1410. J. Fluid Mech. 187, 61–98.Google Scholar
Spalart, P. R. & Leonard, A. 1987 Direct numerical simulation of equilibrium turbulent boundary layers. In Turbulent Shear Flows 5 (ed. Durst, F., Launder, B. E., Lumley, J. L., Schmidt, F. W. & Whitelaw, J. H.), pp 234–252. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalart, P. R. & Watmuff, J. H. 1993 Experimental and numerical study of a turbulent boundary layer with pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 337–371.Google Scholar
Stratford, B. S. 1959 An experimental flow with zero skin friction throughout its region of pressure rise. J. Fluid Mech. 8, 143–155.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, D. C. 1993 Turbulence Modeling for CFD. Griffin.Google Scholar