Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:06:01.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A turbulent boundary layer disturbed by a cylinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2006

Eisuke Marumo
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Kenjiro Suzuki
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Takashi Sato
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Abstract

This paper deals with a two-dimensional turbulent boundary layer disturbed by a circular cylinder. The cylinder was placed inside or outside the boundary layer with its axis parallel to the wall and normal to the flow direction. The mean velocity, wall shear stress, longitudinal turbulent intensity, autocorrelations and turbulent length scale were measured and here the relaxation features of the disturbed boundary layer are discussed. The measurements were made for a ratio of the cylinder diameter d to the undisturbed boundary-layer thickness δ0 equal to 0·30 and for three values of the ratio of the height h of the cylinder axis to δ0 equal to 0·222, 0·556 and 1·24.

The results show that the near-wall region of the disturbed boundary layer recovers much more quickly than the outer region and that in the case h0 = 0·222 the recovery is faster than in other cases, as reported by Clauser (1956). Moreover, it is found that the fluctuating velocity field recovers more slowly than the mean velocity field, and that the characteristics of the turbulence in the outer region are still close to those in the wake of an isolated cylinder at the last measurement station, although the mean velocity profile has almost completely returned to its natural shape.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1978 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonia, R. A. & Luxton, R. E. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 53, 737.
Bradshaw, P. & Wong, F. Y. F. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 52, 113.
Clauser, F. H. 1956 Adv. Appl. Mech. 4, 1.
Coles, D. E. 1968 AFOSR–IFP–Stanford Conf. Comp. Turbulent Boundary Layers, Stanford Univ. vol. 2, p. 5.
Escudier, M. P., Nicoll, W. B. & Spalding, D. B. 1966 Dept. Mech. Engng, Imp. Coll. Tech. Note TWF/TN/12.
Eskinazi, S. 1958 N.A.S.A. Tech. Note D-83.
Fujita, H., Takahama, H. & Yamashita, R. 1974 Proc. 11th Japan Heat Transfer Symp., Nagoya, p. 453.
Hinze, J. O., Sonnenberg, R. E. & Builtjes, P. J. H. 1974 Appl. Sci. Res. 29, 1.
Irwin, H. P. A. H. 1974 Aero. Res. Counc. Current Paper no. 1267.
Kacker, S. C. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1968 Trans. A.S.M.E., J. Appl. Mech. E 90, 641.
Kacker, S. C. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1971 Trans. A.S.M.E., J. Appl. Mech. E 93, 239.
Klebanoff, P. S. 1954 N.A.C.A. Tech. Note no. 3178.
Ludwieg, H. & Tillmann, W. 1950 N.A.C.A. Tech. Memo. no. 1285.
Nicoll, W. B. & Escudier, M. P. 1966 A.I.A.A. J. 4, 940.
Patel, V. C. 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 23, 185.
Reichardt, H. 1942 VDI-Forchungsheft, p. 414.
Schlichting, H. 1930 Ing. Arch. 1, 533.
Schlichting, H. 1968 Boundary Layer Theory. McGraw-Hill.
Tani, I. 1968 AFOSR–IFP–Stanford Conf. Comp. Turbulent Boundary Layers, Stanford Univ. vol. 1, p. 483.