Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T17:49:21.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transonic flow around the leading edge of a thin airfoil with a parabolic nose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Z. Rusak
Z. Rusak
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aeronautical Engineering and Mechanics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Transonic potential flow around the leading edge of a thin two-dimensional general airfoil with a parabolic nose is analysed. Asymptotic expansions of the velocity potential function are constructed at a fixed transonic similarity parameter (K) in terms of the thickness ratio of the airfoil in an outer region around the airfoil and in an inner region near the nose. These expansions are matched asymptotically. The outer expansion consists of the transonic small-disturbance theory and it second-order problem, where the leading-edge singularity appears. The inner expansion accounts for the flow around the nose, where a stagnation point exists. Analytical expressions are given for the first terms of the inner and outer asymptotic expansions. A boundary value problem is formulated in the inner region for the solution of a uniform sonic flow about an infinite two-dimensional parabola at zero angle of attack, with a symmetric far-field approximation, and with no circulation around it. The numerical solution of the flow in the inner region results in the symmetric pressure distribution on the parabolic nose. Using the outer small-disturbance solution and the nose solution a uniformly valid pressure distribution on the entire airfoil surface can be derived. In the leading terms, the flow around the nose is symmetric and the stagnation point is located at the leading edge for every transonic Mach number of the oncoming flow and shape and small angle of attack of the airfoil. The pressure distribution on the upper and lower surfaces of the airfoil is symmetric near the edge point, and asymmetric deviations increase and become significant only when the distance from the leading edge of the airfoil increases beyond the inner region. Good agreement is found in the leading-edge region between the present solution and numerical solutions of the full potential-flow equations and the Euler equations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 248 , March 1993 , pp. 1 - 26
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, I. H. & Doenhoff, A. E. von 1959 Theory of Wing Sections. Dover.
Albone, C. M., Catherall, D., Hall, M. G. & Joyce, G. 1974 RAE Tech. Rep. 74056. An improved numerical method for solving the transonic small-disturbance equation for the flow past a lifting airfoil.
Bateman, H. 1953 Higher Transcendental Functions, vol. 1. McGraw-Hill.
Bauer, F., Garabedian, P., Korn, D. & Jameson, A. 1975 Supercritical Wing Sections II. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 108. Springer.
Cole, J. D. 1991 Asymptotic theory in aerodynamics, AIAA Paper 91– 0028.Google Scholar
Cole, J. D. & Cook, L. P. 1986 Transonic Aerodynamics. North-Holland.
Guderley, K. G. 1962 The Theory of Transonic Flow. Pergamon.
Hughes, T. J. R., Franca, L. P. & Hulbert, G. M. 1989 A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics. VIII. The Galerkin least squares method for advectivediffusive equations. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 73, 173– 189.Google Scholar
Jameson, A. 1985 Transonic flow calculations. Princeton University MAE Rep. 1651.
Keyfitz, B. L., Melnik, R. E. & Grossman, B. 1978 An analysis of the leading-edge singularity in transonic small disturbance theory. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 31, 137– 155.Google Scholar
Keyfitz, B. L., Melnik, R. E. & Grossman, B. 1979 Leading-edge singularity in transonic small disturbance theory: numerical resolution. AIAA J. 17, 296– 298.Google Scholar
Kusunose, K. 1979 Two-dimensional flow past convex and concave corners at transonic speed and two-dimensional flow around a parabolic nose at subsonic and transonic speeds. Ph. D thesis, University of California at Los Angeles, CA.
Müller, E. A. & Matschat, K. 1964 Ähnlichkeitslösungen der Transsonischen Gleichungen bei der Anström – Machzahl 1. In Proc. 11th Intl Congr. Applied Mechanics, Munich, Germany (ed. H. Görtler), pp. 1061– 1068. Springer.
Murman, E. M. & Cole, J. D. 1971 Calculation of plane steady transonic flows. AIAA J. 9, 114– 121.Google Scholar
Nonweiler, T. R. F. 1958 The sonic flow about some symmetric half-bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 4, 140– 148.Google Scholar
Rusak, Z. 1990 Subsonic flow around a thin airfoil with a parabolic nose. Dept. of Mathematics Rep. 186. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Webster, B. E., Shephard, M. S., Rusak, Z. & Flaherty, J. E. 1992 An adaptive finite element method for rotorcraft aerodynamics. 7th IMACS Conf. on Computer Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Rutgers University (ed. R. Vichnevetsky). Elsevier (in press).