Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T14:54:02.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Torsion effect on fully developed flow in a helical pipe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

Hsiao C. Kao
Affiliation:
Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135, USA

Abstract

Two approaches have been used to study the torsion effect on the fully developed laminar flow in a helical pipe of constant circular cross-section. The first approach is the series expansion method that perturbs the Poiseuille flow and is valid for low Dean numbers with both the dimensionless curvature and dimensionless torsion being much less than unity. The second is a numerical procedure that solves the complete Navier-Stokes equation and is applicable to intermediate values of the Dean number. The results obtained indicate that, as far as the secondary flow patterns are concerned, the presence of torsion can produce a large effect if the ratio of the curvature to the torsion is of order unity. In these cases the secondary flow, though still consisting of a pair of vortices, can be very much distorted. Under extreme conditions one vortex is so prevalent as to squeeze the second one into a narrow region. However, ordinarily the torsion effect is small and the secondary flow has the usual pattern of a pair of counter-rotating vortices of nearly equal strength. Concerning the flow resistance in the pipe the effect of torsion is always small in all the circumstances that have so far been considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1987 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, S. A., Talbot, L. & Yao, L. S. 1983 Flow in curved pipes. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15, 461512.Google Scholar
Dean, W. R. 1928 The stream-line motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Phil. Mag. 5, 673.Google Scholar
Dennis, S. C. R. & No, M. 1982 Dual solutions for steady laminar flow through a curved tube. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 35, 305.Google Scholar
Germano, M. 1982 On the effect of torsion on a helical pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 125, 1.Google Scholar
Hamed, A. & Abdallah, S. 1979 Streamlike function: a new concept in flow problems formulation. J. Aircraft 16, 801.Google Scholar
Han, T., Humphrey, J. A. C. & Launder, B. E. 1981 A comparison of hybrid and quadratic-upstream differencing in high Reynolds number elliptic flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engng 29, 81.Google Scholar
Larrain, J. & Bonilla, C. F. 1970 Theoretical analysis of pressure drop in the laminar flow of fluid in a coiled pipe. Trans. Soc. Rheol. 14, 135.Google Scholar
Leonard, B. P. 1979 A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engng 19, 59.Google Scholar
Manlapaz, R. L. & Churchill, S. W. 1980 Fully developed laminar flow in a helically coiled tube of finite pitch. Chem. Eng. Commun. 7, 57.Google Scholar
McConalogue, D. J. & Srivastava, R. S. 1968 Motion of a fluid in a curved tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 307, 37.Google Scholar
Murata, S., Miyake, Y., Inaba, T. & Ogawa, H. 1981 Laminar flow in a helically coiled pipe. Bull. JSME, 24, 355.Google Scholar
Patankar, S. V. 1980 Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. Hemisphere.
Soh, W. Y. & Berger, S. A. 1984 Laminar entrance flow in a curved pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 109.Google Scholar
Truesdell, L. C. & Adler, R. J. 1970 Numerical treatment of fully developed laminar flow in helically coiled tubes. AIChE J. 16, 1010.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, M. 1978 Extended Stokes series: laminar flow through a loosely coiled pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 86, 129.Google Scholar
Wang, C. Y. 1981 On the low-Reynolds-number flow in a helical pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 108, 185.Google Scholar