Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T09:14:40.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synoptic velocity and pressure fields at the water–sediment interface of streambeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2010

M. DETERT ,
V. NIKORA  and
G. H. JIRKA
M. DETERT*
Affiliation:
Institute for Hydromechanics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstrasse 12, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
V. NIKORA
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Fraser Noble Building, Kings College, Aberdeen AB243UE, UK
G. H. JIRKA
Affiliation:
Institute for Hydromechanics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstrasse 12, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
*
†Present address: VAW, ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 37/39, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland. Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive study of the near-bed hydrodynamics at non-moving streambeds based on laboratory experiments in open-channel flows. Pressure and velocity measurements were made with an array of up to 15 miniaturized piezo-resistive pressure sensors within the bed and slightly above it, and a two-dimensional particle-image-velocimetry (PIV) system measuring in streamwise vertical or horizontal planes. Three different types of bed materials were studied covering typical natural streambed conditions. The range of the global Reynolds number covered in the experiments was from 20000 to 200000. This study provides new insights into the flow structure over gravel beds based on the PIV measurements in both streamwise vertical and horizontal planes. In a streamwise vertical plane, large-scale wedge-like flow structures were observed where a zone of faster fluid over-rolled a zone with slower fluid. The resulting shear layer was inclined along the flow at an angle of 10°–25° to the bed, and was populated with clockwise rotating eddies. This mechanism occurred with sufficient frequency and shape to leave an ‘imprint’ in the velocity statistics. Typically, the described flow pattern is formed near the bed and is approximately scaled with the height of the logarithmic layer, although the biggest structures extended over the whole flow depth. In a horizontal near-bed plane, turbulent structures formed a patched ‘chessboard’ pattern with regions of lower and higher velocities that were elongated in the streamwise direction. Their lateral extension was typically two to four times the equivalent sand roughness with lengths up to several water depths. The dimensions of the regions were increasing linearly with the distance from the bed. These findings are consistent with conceptual models originally developed for smooth-wall flows. They also support observations made in rough-bed flume experiments, numerical simulations and natural rivers. Spatial fields of bed-pressure fluctuations were reconstructed by applying Taylor's frozen turbulence hypothesis on time data obtained with an array of pressure sensors. Based on the conditional sampling of velocity patterns associated with pressure-drop events a distinct bed-destabilizing flow-pressure pattern was identified. If a high-speed fluid in the wake of a large-scale wedge-like flow structure reaches the vicinity of the bed, a phenomenon akin to a Bernoulli effect leads to a distinctive low-pressure pattern. The resulting force may exceed the particles' submerged weight and is assumed to be able to give an initial lift to the particle. As a result, the exposed area of a particle is amplified and its angle of repose is reduced, increasing the probability for entrainment.

JFM classification

Waves/Free-surface Flows: Channel flow Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: Pattern formation Vortex Flows: Vortex dynamics
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 660 , 10 October 2010 , pp. 55 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adrian, R. J. 2007 Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence. Phys. Fluids 19, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrian, R. J., Christensen, K. T. & Liu, Z. C. 2000 a Analysis and interpretation of instantaneous turbulent velocity fields. Exp. Fluids 29, 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrian, R. J., Meinhart, C. D. & Tomkins, C. D. 2000 b Vortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, L. & Radin, C. 2003 Packing of equal spheres in hyperbolic space. Discrete Comput. Geom. 29, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffin-Bélanger, T. & Roy, A. 2005 1 min in the life of a river: selecting the optimal record length for the measurement of turbulence in fluvial boundary layers. Geomorphology 68, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffin-Bélanger, T., Roy, A. & Kirkbride, A. D. 2000 On large-scale flow structures in a gravel-bed river. Geomorphology 32, 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffington, J. M. & Montgomery, D. R. 1997 A systematic analysis of eight decades of incipient motion studies, with special reference to gravel-bedded rivers. Water Resour. Res. 33 (8), 1993–2029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, S. M. 2006 Near-boundary flow structure and particle entrainment. PhD thesis, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Cameron, S. M., Coleman, S. E., Melville, B. W. & Nikora, V. I. 2006 Marbles in oil, just like a river? In River Flow 2006 (ed. Ferreira, R., Alves, E., Leal, J. & Cardoso, A.). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Carman, P. C. 1956 Flow of Gases Through Porous Media. Butterworth Scientific.Google Scholar
Chang, P. A., Piomelli, U. & Blake, W. K. 1999 Relationship between wall-pressures and velocity-field sources. Phys. Fluids A 11 (11), 3434–3448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, K. T. & Adrian, R. J. 2001 Statistical evidence of hairpin vortex packets in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 431, 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defina, A. 1996 Transverse spacing of low-speed streaks in a channel flow over a rough bed. In Coherent Flow Structures in Open Channels (ed. Ashworth, P. J., Bennett, S. L., Best, J. L. & Mc Lelland, S. J.). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dennis, D. J. C. & Nickels, T. B. 2008 On the limitations of Taylor's hypothesis in constructing long structures in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 614, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detert, M. 2008 Hydrodynamic processes at the water–sediment interface of streambeds. Doctoral thesis, University of Karlsruhe, available at: http://digbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/volltexte/1000008267Google Scholar
Drake, T., Shreve, R., Dietrich, W., Whiting, P. & Leopold, L. 1988 Bed load transport of fine gravel observed by motion-picture photography. J. Fluid Mech. 192, 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grass, A. J., Stuart, R. J. & Mansour-Tehrani, M. 1991 Vortical structures and coherent motion in turbulent flow over smooth and rough boundaries. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Engng Sci. 336, 36–65.Google Scholar
Hardy, R. J., Best, J. L., Lane, S. N. & Carbonneau, P. E. 2009 Coherent flow structures in a depth-limited flow over a gravel surface: the role of near-bed turbulence and influence of Reynolds number. J. Geophys. Res. 114, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazen, A. 1892 Physical properties of sands and gravels with reference to use in filtration. Rep. 539, Massachusetts State Board of Health.Google Scholar
Head, M. R. & Bandyopadhyay, P. 1981 New aspects of boundary layer structure. J. Fluid Mech. 107, 297–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofland, B. 2005 Rock & roll. PhD thesis, TU Delft, available at: www.library.tudelft.nlGoogle Scholar
Hofland, B. & Battjes, J. A. 2006 Probability density function of instantaneous drag forces and shear stresses on a bed. J. Hydraul. Engng 132 (11), 1169–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofland, B. & Booij, R. 2004 Measuring the flow structures that initiate stone movement. In River Flow 2004 (ed. Greco, M., Carravetta, A. & Della Morte, R.). A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Hofland, B., Booij, R. & Battjes, J. A. 2005 Measurement of fluctuating pressures on coarse bed material. J. Hydraul. Engng 131 (9), 770–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurther, D., Lemmin, U. & Terray, E. A. 2007 Turbulent transport in the outer region of rough-wall open-channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 574, 465–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, G. 1976 Sedimentological and fluid-dynamic implications of the turbulent bursting phenomenon in geophysical flows. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 531–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A. & Runstadler, P. W. 1967 The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Peter, E. & Müller, R. 1949 Eine Formel zur Berechnumg des Geschiebetriebs. Schweiz. Bauzeitung 67 (3), 29–32.Google Scholar
Mignot, E., Hurther, D. & Barthelemy, E. 2009 Double averaging analysis and local flow characterization of near bed turbulence in gravel-bed channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 618, 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. M., Shreve, R. L., MacLean, S. R. & Drake, T. G. 1995 Role of near-bed turbulence structure in bed load transport and bed form mechanics. Water Resour. Res. 31 (8), 2071–2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezu, I. & Nakagawa, H. 1993 Turbulence in Open-Channel Flows. A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Nikora, V. I. & Goring, D. G. 2000 Eddy convection velocity and Taylor's hypothesis of frozen turbulence in a rough-bed open-channel flow. J. Hydrosci. Hydraul. Engng 18 (2), 75–91.Google Scholar
Nikora, V. I., Goring, D. G., MacEwan, I. & Griffiths, G. 2001 Spatially averaged open-channel flow over rough bed. J. Hydraul. Engng 127 (2), 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nino, Y. & García, M. H. 1996 Experiments on particle–turbulence interactions in the near wall region of an open channel flow: implications for sediment transport. J. Fluid Mech. 326, 285–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Radecke, H. & Schulz-DuBois, E. O. 1988 Linear response of fluctuating forces to turbulent velocity components. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Applications of Laser-Doppler Anemometry to Fluid Mechanics (ed. Adrian, R. J.), pp. 23–44. Lisbon, Portugal, Springer.Google Scholar
van Rijn, L. C. 1984 Sediment transport. Part I. Bed load transport. J. Hydraul. Engng 110 (10), 1431–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, A. G., Buffin-Bélanger, T., Lamarre, H. & Kirkbride, A. D. 2004 Size, shape and dynamics of large-scale turbulent flow structures in a gravel bed river. J. Fluid Mech. 500, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sechet, P. & Le Guennec, B. 1999 Bursting phenomenon and incipient motion of solid particles in bed-load transport. J. Hydraul. Res. 37 (5), 683–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, A. 1936 Anwendung der Ähnlichkeitsmechanik und der Turbulenzforschung auf die Geschiebebewegung. Mitt. Versuchsanstalt Wasserbau Schiffbau (Berlin) 26, 1–26.Google Scholar
Shvidchenko, A. B. & Pender, G. 2001 Macroturbulent structure of open-channel flow over gravel beds. Water Resour. Res. 37 (3), 709–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, T. & Graf, W. H. 1994 Non-uniform open-channel flow over a rough bed. J. Hydrosci. Hydraul. Engng, Tokyo 12 (1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Stösser, T., Rodi, W. & Fröhlich, J. 2005 LES of open-channel flow over a layer of spheres. In Proceedings of the 31st IAHR Congress (ed. Jun, B. H., Lee, S. I., Seo, I. W. & Choi, G. W.), CD-Rom. Seoul, Korea, Korea Water Resources Association.Google Scholar
Sumer, B. M. & Deigaard, R. 1981 Particle motions near the bottom in turbulent flow in an open channel. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 109, 301–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumer, B. M. & Oguz, B. 1978 Particle motions near the bottom in turbulent flow in an open channel. J. Fluid Mech. 86, 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, A. J. 1967 Proposed mechanism for sediment entrainment by turbulent flows. J. Geophys. Res. 72 (24), 6183–6194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. S. W. & Bull, M. K. 1983 On the role of wall-pressure fluctuations in deterministic motions in the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 128, 283–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, C. D. 2001 The structure of turbulence over smooth and rough walls. PhD thesis, Graduate College, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Tomkins, C. D. & Adrian, R. J. 2003 Spanwise structure and scale growth in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 490, 37–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, F. C. & Jiang, M. R. 2007 Numerical investigation of the role of turbulent bursting in sediment entrainment. J. Hydraul. Engng 133 (3), 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Adrian, R. J. & Balachandar, S. 1996 Autogeneration of near-wall vortical structures in channel flow. Phys. Fluids 8 (1), 288–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar