Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:15:13.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subharmonic transition to turbulence in a flat-plate boundary layer at Mach number 4.5

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

N. A. Adams  and
L. Kleiser
N. A. Adams
Affiliation:
DLR, Institute of Fluid Mechanics, Bunsenstraße 10, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany Present address: Institute of Fluid Dynamics, ETH Zentrum, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
L. Kleiser
Affiliation:
DLR, Institute of Fluid Mechanics, Bunsenstraße 10, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany Present address: Institute of Fluid Dynamics, ETH Zentrum, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The subharmonic transition process of a flat-plate boundary layer at a free-stream Mach number of M∞ = 4.5 and a Reynolds number of 10000 based on free-stream velocity and initial displacement thickness is investigated by direct numerical simulation up to the beginning of turbulence. A second-mode instability superimposed with random noise of low amplitude is forced initially. The secondary subharmonic instability evolves from the noise in accordance with theory and leads to a staggered Λ-vortex pattern. Finite-amplitude Λ-vortices initiate the build-up of detached high-shear layers below and above the critical layer. The detached shear-layer generation and break-up are confined to the relative-subsonic part of the boundary layer. The breakdown to turbulence can be separated into two phases, the first being the break-up of the lower shear layer and the second being the break-up of the upper shear layer. Four levels of subsequent roll-up of the lower, Y-shaped shear layer have been observed, leading to new vortical structures which are unknown from transition at low Mach numbers. The upper shear layer behaviour is similar to that of the well-known high-shear layer in incompressible boundary-layer transition. It is concluded that, as in incompressible flow, turbulence is generated via a cascade of vortices and detached shear layers with successively smaller scales. The different phases of shear-layer break-up are also reflected in the evolution of averaged quantities. A strong decrease of the shape factor, as well as an increase of the skin friction coefficient, and a gradual loss of spanwise symmetry indicate the final breakdown to turbulence, where the mean velocity and temperature profiles approach those measured in fully turbulent flow.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 317 , 25 June 1996 , pp. 301 - 335
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, N. A. 1993 Numerische Simulation von Transitionsmechanismen in kompressiblen Grenzschichten. Doctoral Thesis, Technische Universität München; also DLR-FB 93–29, DLR, Germany (in German).
Adams, N. A. & Kleiser, L. 1993a Numerical simulation of transition in a compressible flat plate boundary layer. In Transitional and Turbulent Compressible Flows (ed. L. D. Kral & T. A. Zang). ASME-FED vol. 151, pp. 101–110.
Adams, N. A. & Kleiser, L. 1993b Numerical simulation of fundamental breakdown of a laminar boundary-layer at Mach 4.5. AIAA Paper 93-5027.
Adams, N. A., Sandham, N. D. & Kleiser, L. 1992 A method for direct numerical simulation of compressible boundary-layer transition. In Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, vol. 35 (ed. J. B. Vos, A. Rizzi & I. Rhyming), pp. 523–532. Vieweg.
Canuto, C., Hussaini, M. Y., Quarteroni, A. & Zang, T. A. 1988 Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics. Springer.
Carpenter, M. H., Gottlieb, D. & Abarbanel, S. 1993 The stability of numerical boundary treatments for compact high-order finite difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 108, 272–295.Google Scholar
Drazin, P. G., Reid W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.
Eissler, W. & Bestek, H. 1993 Spatial numerical simulations of nonlinear transition phenomena in supersonic boundary layers. In Transitional and Turbulent Compressible Flows (ed. L. D. Kral & T. A. Zang) 101–110. ASME-FED vol. 151, pp. 69–76.
Erlebacher, G. & Hussaini, M. Y. 1990 Numerical experiments in supersonic boundary-layer stability. Phys. Fluids A 2, 94–104.Google Scholar
Fasel, H., Thumm, A. & Bestek, H. 1993 Direct numerical simulation of transition in supersonic boundary layers: oblique breakdown. In Transitional and Turbulent Compressible Flows (ed. L. D. Kral & T. A. Zang). ASME-FED vol. 151, pp. 77–92.
Fernholz, H. H. & Finley, P. J. 1977 A critical compilation of compressible boundary layer data with a survey of turbulent data. AGARDograph 263.
Guo, Y., Adams, N. A., Kleiser, L. 1995 Modeling of nonparallel effects in temporal direct numerical simulations of compressible boundary layer transition. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 7, 141–157.Google Scholar
Guo, Y., Adams, N. A., Sandham, N. D. & Kleiser, L. 1994 Numerical simulation of supersonic boundary layer transition. AGARD CP-551.
Guo, Y., Kleiser, L. & Adams, N. A. 1996 A comparison study of an improved temporal DNS and spatial DNS of compressible boundary layer transition. AIAA J. 34 (in press).Google Scholar
Herbert, T. 1988 Secondary instability of boundary layers. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 487–526.Google Scholar
Kachanov, Y. S. & Levchenko V. Y. 1984 The resonant interaction of disturbances at laminar-turbulent transition in a boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 138, 209–247.Google Scholar
Kendall, J. M. 1967 Supersonic boundary layer stability experiments. In Boundary Layer Transition Study Group Meeting, Vol. II, BSD-TR-67-213, USAF (ed. W. D. McCauley), pp. 10-1–10-8.
Kosinov, A. D., Maslov, A. A. & Shevelkov, S. G. 1990 Experiments on the stability of supersonic laminar boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 219, 621–633.Google Scholar
Lele, S. K. 1992 Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103, 16–42.Google Scholar
Mack, L. M. 1984 Boundary-layer linear stability theory. In Special Course on Stability and Transition of Laminar Flow, AGARD Rep. 709, pp. 3-1–3-81.
Mack, L. M. 1990 On the inviscid acoustic-mode instability of supersonic shear flows. Part 1. Two-dimensional waves. Theor. Comp. Fluid Dyn. 2, 97–123.Google Scholar
Mayer, E. W. & Powell, K. G. 1992 Similarity solutions for viscous vortex cores. J. Fluid Mech. 238, 487–507.Google Scholar
Moin, P., Leonard, A. & Kim, J. 1986 Evolution of a curved vortex filament into a vortex ring. Phys. Fluids 29, 955–963.Google Scholar
Ng, L. & Erlebacher, G. 1992 Secondary instabilities in compressible boundary layers. Phys. Fluids A 4, 710–726.Google Scholar
Owen, F. K. & Horstman, C. C. 1972 On the structure of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 53, 611–636.Google Scholar
Pruett, C. D. & Chang, C. L. 1993 A comparison of PSE and DNS for high-speed boundary-layer flows. In Transitional and Turbulent Compressible Flows, (ed. L. D. Kral & T. A. Zang). ASME-FED vol. 151, pp. 57–67.
Pruett, C. D. & Chang, C.-L. 1995 Spatial direct numerical simulation of high-speed boundary-layer flows — part II: transition on a cone in Mach 8 flow. Theor. Comp. Fluid Dyn. 7, 397–424.Google Scholar
Pruett, C. D. & Zang, T. A. 1992 Direct numerical simulation of laminar breakdown in high-speed, axisymmetric boundary layers. Theor. Comp. Fluid Dyn. 3, 345–367.Google Scholar
Pruett, C. D., Zang, T. A., Chang, C.-L. & Carpenter, M. H. 1995 Spatial direct numerical simulation of high-speed boundary-layer flows — part I: algorithmic considerations and validation. Theor. Comp. Fluid Dyn. 7, 49–76.Google Scholar
Sandham, N. D., Adams, N. A. & Kleiser, L. 1994 Direct simulation of breakdown to turbulence following oblique instability waves in a supersonic boundary layer. In Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation I (ed. P. R. Voke et al), pp. 213–223.
Sandham, N. D. & Kleiser, L. 1992 The late stages of transition to turbulence in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 245, 319–348.Google Scholar
Sandham, N. D. & Reynolds, W. C. 1991 Three-dimensional simulations of large eddies in the compressible mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 224, 133–158.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S., Erlebacher, G., Hussaini, M. Y. & Kreiss, H. O. 1991 The analysis and modeling of dilatational terms in compressible turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 182, 85–109.Google Scholar
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 1992 A new mechanism for rapid transition involving a pair of oblique waves. Phys. Fluids A 4, 1986–1989.Google Scholar
Simen, M. & Dallmann, U. 1992 On the instability of hypersonic flow past a pointed cone – comparison of theoretical and experimental results at Mach 8. DLR FB 92-02, DLR, Germany.
Spalart, P. R. & Yang, K. S. 1987 Numerical study of ribbon-introduced transition in Blasius flow. J. Fluid Mech. 178, 345–365.Google Scholar
Spina, E. F. & Smits, A. J. 1987 Organized structures in a compressible turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 473–493.Google Scholar
Stetson, K. F. & Kimmel, R. L. 1992 On hypersonic boundary layer stability. AIAA Paper 92-0737.
Stetson, K. F. & Kimmel, R. L. 1993 On the breakdown of a hypersonic laminar boundary layer. AIAA Paper 93-0896.
Stewartson, K. 1964 The Theory of Laminar Boundary Layers in Compressible Fluids. Oxford University Press.
Stuart, J.T. 1965 The production of intense shear layers by vortex stretching and convection. AGARD Rep. 514.
Thompson, K.W. 1987 Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 68, 1–24.Google Scholar
Thumm, A., Wolz, W. & Fasel, H. 1990 Numerical simulation of spatially growing three-dimensional disturbance waves in compressible boundary layers. In Laminar-Turbulent Transition (ed. D. Arnal & R. Michel), 303–308, Springer.
Vollmers, H., Kreplin, H.-P. & Meier H.U. 1983 Separation and vortical-type flow around a prolate spheroid – evaluation of relevant parameters. AGARD CP 342, pp. 14-1–14-14.
Wray, A.A. 1986 Very low storage time-advancement schemes. Internal Rep. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, California.
Zeman, O. 1990 Dilatation dissipation: The concept and application in modeling compressible mixing layers. Phys. Fluids A 2, 178–188.Google Scholar