Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:58:44.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A study of free jet impingement. Part 1. Mean properties of free and impinging jets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

Coleman duP. Donaldson
Affiliation:
Aeronautical Research Associates of Princeton, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey
Richard S. Snedeker
Affiliation:
Aeronautical Research Associates of Princeton, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey

Abstract

In this, the first part of a two-part experimental study of the behaviour of impinging jets, the mean properties of the flow field are established. Velocity profiles are given for three types of jet flow issuing from a circular convergent nozzle. Measured distributions of surface pressure are given which result when the jets impinge both normally and obliquely at various distances on several surface shapes. The pressure distributions are used to compute the radial velocity gradient at the impingement stagnation point. It is found that for normal impingement this gradient correlates with the free jet centreline velocity and half-radius at the same axial location. A fall-off in the correlated value is noted as the impingement is made oblique. Measurements of the azimuthal distribution of momentum flux in the resulting wall jet are also given. The general behaviour of all three types of jet is found to be similar at locations downstream of any local effects due to the shock waves present in the under-expanded types. A special study of the close-range impingement of an under-expanded jet containing a normal shock disk reveals a region of separated flow surrounding the stagnation point. This condition results in a negative value of the radial velocity gradient at the centreline.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1971 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, A. R. & Johns, F. R. 1955 Jet Propul. 25, 1315, 25.
Anderson, A. R., Johns, F. R. & Hawkes, W. M. 1954 US NADC-ED-5401.
D'Attore, L. & Harshbarger, F. 1964 General Dynamics/Astronautics Report GDA-DBE 64-008.
Donaldson, C. duP. & Gray, K. E. 1966 AIAA J. 4, 20172025.
Glauert, M. B. 1956 J. Fluid Mech. 1, 625643.
Hammitt, A. G. 1961 J. Aero. Sci. 28, 673680.
Henderson, L. F. 1960 Australian Defence Scientific Service, Mech. Engng Note 238.
Krzywoblocki, M. Z. 1956 Jet Propul. 26, 760779.
Love, E. S., Grigsby, C. E., Lee, L. P. & Woodling, M. J. 1959 NASA TR R-6.
Olson, R. E. & Miller, D. P. 1963 United Aircraft Corp. Report A-1771-24.
Owen, P. L. & Thornhill, C. K. 1952 Aero. Res. Council R & M 2616.
Reshotko, E. & Cohen, C. B. 1955 NACA TN 3513.
Seddon, J. & Haverty, L. 1956 Aero. Res. Council C.P. 246.
Snedeker, R. S. & Donaldson, C. duP. 1964 Aero. Res. Associates of Princeton, Inc. Report 63.
Snedeker, R. S. & Donaldson, C. duP. 1965 Aero. Res. Associates of Princeton, Inc. Report 64.
Stitt, L. E. 1961 NASA TN D-1095.
Warren, W. R. 1957 Princeton Univ. Aero. Engng Dept. Report 381.