Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-01T11:22:47.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure of large-scale vortices and unsteady reverse flow in the reattaching zone of a turbulent separation bubble

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

Masaru Kiya  and
Kyuro Sasaki
Masaru Kiya
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060, Japan
Kyuro Sasaki
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes experiments concerning the structure of large-scale vortices and the unsteady reverse-flow properties in the reattaching zone of a nominally two-dimensional separation bubble formed at the leading edge of a blunt flat plate with right-angled corners. The experiment was performed in a wind tunnel with a constant Reynolds number 2.6 × 104 (based on the main-flow velocity and the thickness of the plate). Split-film probes, being sensitive to instantaneous reversals of flow direction, were extensively employed. An important feature of this study is a judicious use of surface-pressure fluctuations as a conditioning signal to educe the structure of the large-scale vortices.

Distributions of fluctuating-velocity vectors and contour lines of high-frequency turbulent energy in a few space–time domains are presented and discussed. The most economical interpretation of these space-time distributions is that the large-scale vortices in the reattaching zone are hairpin vortices whose configuration is sketched in the text. The unsteady flow in the reattaching zone is mainly governed by two agents; the motion of the large-scale vortices and the low-frequency unsteadiness. The unsteady flow is clarified in terms of the motion (in a space–time domain) of zeros of the longitudinal velocity close to the surface of the plate; the effects of the two agents on this motion are presented separately. On the basis of these results, a mathematical model of the unsteady flow in the reattaching zone is suggested and found to yield good comparison with measured reverse-flow intermittency and frequency of local-flow reversals. It appears that the separation bubble experiences shrinkage and enlargement in connection with the low-frequency unsteadiness and that the speed of shrinkage is much greater than that of enlargement. The strength of the large-scale vortices in the reattaching zone seems to be dependent on the phase of the low-frequency unsteadiness.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 154 , May 1985 , pp. 463 - 491
Copyright
© 1985 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arie, M., Kiya, M. & Sasaki, K. 1983 Leading-edge separation bubble simulated by a discrete-vortex model. Trans. JSME B49, 923–930 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. & Wong, F. Y. F. 1972 The reattachment and relaxation of a turbulent shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 113–135.Google Scholar
Chandrsuda, C. & Bradshaw, P. 1981 Turbulence structure of a reattaching shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 110, 171–194.Google Scholar
Cherry, N. J., Hillier, R. & Latour, M. E. M. P. 1983 The unsteady structure of two-dimensional separated-and-attaching flows. J. Wind Engng & Ind. Aerodyn. 11, 95–105.Google Scholar
Cherry, N. J., Hillier, R. & Latour, M. E. M. P. 1984 Unsteady measurements in a separated and reattaching flow. J. Fluid Mech. 144, 13–46.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. K. & Johnston, J. P. 1980 Turbulent flow reattachment: an experimental study of the flow and structure behind a backward-facing step. Rep MD-39. Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Eaton, J. K. & Johnston, J. P. 1981 A review on subsonic turbulent flow reattachment. AIAA J. 19, 1093–1100.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. K. & Johnston, J. P. 1982 Low frequency unsteadiness of a reattaching turbulent shear layer. In Turbulent Shear Flows 3 (ed. L. J. S. Bradbury, F. Durst, B. E. Launder, F. W. Schmidt & J. H. Whitelaw), pp. 162–170. Springer.
Hillier, R. & Cherry, N. J. 1981 Pressure fluctuations under a turbulent shear layer. In Proc. 3rd Turbulent Shear Flow Symp., Davis, California, 9–11 September, pp. 16.23–16.28.
Kiya, M. & Sasaki, K. 1983 Structure of a turbulent separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 137, 83–113.Google Scholar
Kiya, M., Sasaki, K. & Arie, M. 1982 Discrete-vortex simulation of a turbulent separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 120, 219–244.Google Scholar
Ota, T. & Kon, N. 1974 Heat transfer in the separated and reattached flow on a blunt flat plate. Trans. ASMEC: J. Heat Transfer 96, 459–462.Google Scholar
Rockwell, D. 1983 Oscillations of impinging shear layers. AIAA J. 21, 645–664.Google Scholar
Roshko, A. 1981 The plane mixing layer flow visualization results and three-dimensional effects. Lecture Notes in Physics 136, pp. 208–217. Springer.
Taneda, S. 1983 Visual observation on the amplification of artificial disturbances in turbulent shear flows. Phys. Fluids 26, 2801–2806.Google Scholar
Wood, D. H. & Bradshaw, P. 1982 A turbulent mixing layer constrained by a solid surface. Part 1. Measurements before reaching the surface. J. Fluid Mech. 122, 57–89.Google Scholar