Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:02:07.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shock-tube studies of single- and quasi-single-mode perturbation growth in Richtmyer–Meshkov flows with reshock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2022

Xu Guo Open the ORCID record for Xu Guo [Opens in a new window] ,
Zhouyang Cong ,
Ting Si Open the ORCID record for Ting Si [Opens in a new window]  and
Xisheng Luo Open the ORCID record for Xisheng Luo [Opens in a new window]
Xu Guo
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, PR China
Zhouyang Cong
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, PR China
Ting Si*
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, PR China
Xisheng Luo
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, PR China
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of heavy/light single-mode (SM), trapezoid (TR) and sawtooth (ST) interfaces is studied experimentally by considering the reshock. The TR and ST interfaces can be expanded into Fourier series with a dominant fundamental mode and more high-order modes, recognized as quasi-single-mode ones. In experiments, the distorted interfaces at the time of first reshock arrival develop in the weakly nonlinear stage, ensuring an approximate single-scale function of evolving interface. The results show an evident memory of initial interface shapes: the bubbles and spikes of ST interface after reshock mainly develop in the streamwise direction with sharp heads, while the counterparts of TR interface tend to grow in the spanwise direction. The influences of high-order modes are amplified by the reshock, resulting in significant interface shape dependence of mixing width growths. The amplitude superposition of major odd-order modes promotes the growth rates of mixing widths for the SM and ST cases, different from the TR one. The ST interface has larger mixing width growth rates in comparison with the SM interface, since high-order modes play a great role in promoting the increase of ST amplitudes, while the TR interface has a relatively small one. The linear and nonlinear mixing width growths of SM, TR and ST interfaces before and after reshock are further analysed theoretically, indicating that the fundamental mode still has a predominant influence on the interface evolution after reshock, and the growth behaviours exhibit strong similarities to those for the singly shocked cases.

JFM classification

Compressible Flows: Shock waves
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 941 , 25 June 2022 , A65
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alon, U., Hecht, J., Ofer, D. & Shvarts, D. 1995 Power laws and similarity of Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov mixing fronts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 534–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, M.J., Youngs, D.L., Livescu, D. & Wei, T. 2014 Computational studies of two-dimensional Rayleigh–Taylor driven mixing for a tilted-rig. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 136, 091212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakumar, B.J., Orlicz, G.C., Ristorcelli, J.R., Balasubramanian, S., Prestridge, K.P. & Tomkins, C.D. 2012 Turbulent mixing in a Richtmyer–Meshkov fluid layer after reshock: velocity and density statistics. J. Fluid Mech. 696, 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakumar, B.J., Orlicz, G.C., Tomkins, C.D. & Prestridge, K.P. 2008 Simultaneous particle-image velocimetry-planar laser-induced fluorescence measurements of Richtmyer–Meshkov instability growth in a gas curtain with and without reshock. Phys. Fluids 20, 124103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balasubramanian, S., Orlicz, G.C., Prestridge, K.P. & Balakumar, B.J. 2012 Experimental study of initial condition dependence on Richtmyer–Meshkov instability in the presence of reshock. Phys. Fluids 24, 034103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouillette, M. & Sturtevant, B. 1989 Growth induced by multiple shock waves normally incident on plane gaseous interfaces. Physica D 37, 248–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouillette, M. & Sturtevant, B. 1993 Experiments on the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability: small-scale perturbations on a plane interface. Phys. Fluids A 5, 916–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouillette, M. & Sturtevant, B. 1994 Experiments on the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability: single-scale perturbations on a continuous interface. J. Fluid Mech. 263, 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charakhch'yan, A.A. 2000 Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of an interface between two media due to passage of two successive shocks. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 41, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, B.D. & Jacobs, J.W. 2002 PLIF flow visualization and measurements of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of an ${\rm air}/{\rm SF}_6$ interface. J. Fluid Mech. 464, 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimonte, G. & Ramaprabhu, P. 2010 Simulations and model of the nonlinear Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. Phys. Fluids 22, 014104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, X., Ding, J., Luo, X. & Zhai, Z. 2018 Evolution of a shocked multimode interface with sharp corners. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 114004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, X., Zhai, Z., Ding, J., Si, T. & Luo, X. 2020 Effects of transverse shock waves on early evolution of multi-mode chevron interface. Phys. Fluids 32, 106101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, X., Zhai, Z., Si, T. & Luo, X. 2019 Bubble merger in initial Richtmyer–Meshkov instability on inverse-chevron interface. Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 092001(R).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, M., Drikakis, D., Youngs, D.L. & Williams, R.J.R. 2011 Richtmyer–Meshkov turbulent mixing arising from an inclined material interface with realistic surface perturbations and reshocked flow. Phys. Fluids 23, 046101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isenberg, C. 1992 The Science of Soap Films and Soap Bubbles. Dover.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J.W. & Krivets, V.V. 2005 Experiments on the late-time development of single-mode Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. Phys. Fluids 17, 034105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J.W., Krivets, V.V. & Tsiklashvili, V. 2013 Experiments on the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability with an imposed, random initial perturbation. Shock Waves 23, 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, J., Drake, R.P. & Remington, B.A. 1999 An evaluation of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability in supernova remnant formation. Astrophys. J. 511, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layzer, D. 1955 On the instability of superposed fluids in a gravitational field. Astrophys. J. 122, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leinov, E., Malamud, G., Elbaz, Y, Levin, L.A, Ben-Dor, G., Shvarts, D. & Sadot, O. 2009 Experimental and numerical investigation of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability under re-shock conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 626, 449–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y., Zhai, Z., Ding, J. & Luo, X. 2019 Richtmyer–Meshkov instability on a quasi-single-mode interface. J. Fluid Mech. 872, 729–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindl, J., Landen, O., Edwards, J., Moses, E. & Team, N. 2014 Review of the national ignition campaign 2009–2012. Phys. Plasmas 21, 020501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L., Liang, Y., Ding, J., Liu, N. & Luo, X. 2018 An elaborate experiment on the single-mode Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. J. Fluid Mech. 853, R2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, X., Liang, Y., Si, T. & Zhai, Z. 2019 Effects of non-periodic portions of interface on Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. J. Fluid Mech. 861, 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansoor, M.M., Dalton, S.M., Martinez, A.A., Desjardins, T., Charonko, J.J. & Prestridge, K.P. 2020 The effect of initial conditions on mixing transition of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. J. Fluid Mech. 904, A3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, J., Reilly, D., Creel, S., McDonald, C., Finn, T. & Ranjan, D. 2014 Experimental investigation of the inclined interface Richtmyer–Meshkov instability before and after reshock. Exp. Fluids 55, 1640–1653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meshkov, E.E. 1969 Instability of the interface of two gases accelerated by a shock wave. Fluid Dyn. 4, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K.A. & Blewett, P.J. 1972 Numerical investigation of the stability of a shock-accelerated interface between two fluids. Phys. Fluids 15, 753–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikaelian, K.O. 1989 Turbulent mixing generated by Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities. Physica D 36, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikaelian, K.O. 2011 Extended model for Richtmyer–Meshkov mix. Physica D 240, 935–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikaelian, K.O. 2015 Testing an analytic model for Richtmyer–Meshkov turbulent mixing widths. Shock Waves 25, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohaghar, M., Carter, J., Musci, B., Reilly, D., McFarland, J. & Ranjan, D. 2017 Evaluation of turbulent mixing transition in a shock-driven variable-density flow. J. Fluid Mech. 831, 779–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohaghar, M., Carter, J., Pathikonda, G. & Ranjan, D. 2019 The transition to turbulence in shock-driven mixing: effects of Mach number and initial conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 871, 595–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, R.V., Aure, R., Stockero, J.D., Greenough, J.A., Cabot, W., Likhachev, O.A. & Jacobs, J.W. 2012 On the late-time growth of the two-dimensional Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities in shock tube experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 712, 354–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motl, B., Oakley, J., Ranjan, D., Weber, C., Anderson, M. & Bonazza, R. 2009 Experimental validation of a Richtmyer–Meshkov scaling law over large density ratio and shock strength ranges. Phys. Fluids 21, 126102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, D., McFarland, J., Mohaghar, M. & Ranjan, D. 2015 The effects of initial conditions and circulation deposition on the inclined-interface reshocked Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. Exp. Fluids 56, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richtmyer, R.D. 1960 Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 13, 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadot, O., Erez, L., Alon, U., Oron, D., Levin, L.A., Erez, G., Ben-Dor, G. & Shvarts, D. 1998 Study of nonlinear evolution of single-mode and two-bubble interaction under Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1654–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetter, M. & Sturtevant, B. 1995 Experiments on the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of an ${\rm air}/{\rm SF}_6$ interface. Shock Waves 4, 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, C., Haehn, N., Oakley, J., Anderson, M. & Bonazza, R. 2012 Richtmyer–Meshkov instability on a low Atwood number interface after reshock. Shock Waves 22, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, C.R., Haehn, N.S., Oakley, J.G., Rothamer, D.A. & Bonazza, R. 2014 An experimental investigation of the turbulent mixing transition in the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. J. Fluid Mech. 748, 457–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J., Kubota, T. & Zukoski, E.E. 1993 Application of shock-induced mixing to supersonic combustion. AIAA J. 31, 854–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q. & Guo, W. 2016 Universality of finger growth in two-dimensional Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities with all density ratios. J. Fluid Mech. 786, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q. & Sohn, S.I. 1997 Nonlinear theory of unstable fluid mixing driven by shock wave. Phys. Fluids 9, 1106–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2017 a Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. I. Phys. Rep. 720–722, 1–136.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2017 b Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. II. Phys. Rep. 723–725, 1–160.Google Scholar