Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:48:39.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The separation of Stokes flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2006

D. H. Michael
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College London
M. E. O'Neill
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College London

Abstract

A study is made of the extent to which local boundary geometry can influence separation in a two-dimensional or an axisymmetric Stokes flow. It is shown that a Stokes flow can separate from a point on a smooth body at an arbitrary angle, which can be determined only by reference to the global solution for the flow past the body, and the dominant mode in the stream function near a point of separation is O(r3) in the distance r from the separation point. When the body has a protruding cusped edge it is shown that separation can occur at an arbitrary inclination to the edge which must again be determined from the global solution. In this case the stream function is O(r3/2) near the edge. When the flow is locally within a wedge-shaped region of angle β, where β ≠ π or 2π, and β > 146·3°, it is shown that the dominant modes near the vertex of the wedge are non-separating modes. It follows that, in general, a Stokes flow around such a wedge cannot separate from the vertex. This conclusion is illustrated by reference to the global solution for uniform axisymmetric flow past a spherical lens, in which the structure of the flow near the rim is examined in detail. In the case of a body having a sharp edge of small but non-zero angle protruding into the flow, so that β is very close to 2π, it is shown that separation occurs exceedingly near to the edge. This happens, for example, in the flow past a thin concave-convex lens, for which separation occurs near the rim on the concave side. The analysis also suggests that a similar separation occurs very near the rim on the flatter side of a thin asymmetric biconvex lens. However, for the symmetric biconvex lens, and, as a special case, the circular disk, no separation occurs on either side near the rim. For β < 146·3·, streaming flow into the vertex of a wedge does not occur because of the presence of an infinite set of vortices, and the possibility of separation at the vertex in the sense discussed here does not arise.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1977 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carrier, G. F. & Lin, C. C. 1948 Quart. Appl. Math. 6, 63.
Collins, W. D. 1963 Mathematika 10, 72.
Davis, A. M. J., O'Neill, M. E., Dorreiaal, J. M. & Ranger, K. B. 1976 J. Fluid Mech. 77, 625.
Dean, W. R. 1944 Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 40, 19.
Dean, W. R. & Montagnon, P. E. 1949 Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 45, 389.
Dorrepaal, J. M., Majumdar, S. R., O'Neill, M. E. & Ranger, K. B. 1976 Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 29, 4, 381.
Dorrepaal, J. M., O'Neill, M. E. & Ranger, K. B. 1976 J. Fluid Mech. 75, 273.
Hobson, E. W. 1931 The Theory of Spherical and Ellipscidal Harmonics. Cambridge University Press.
Michael, D. H. 1958 Mathematika 5, 82.
Michael, D. H. 1964 Appl. Sci. Res. A 13, 349.
Moffatt, H. K. 1964 J. Fluid Mech. 18, 1.
O'Neill, M. E. 1976 To be published.
Payne, L. E. & Pell, W. H. 1960 J. Fluid Mech. 7, 529.
Takematsu, M. 1966 J. Phys. Soc. Japan 21, 1816.