Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:29:35.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Riemann solution for a class of morphodynamic shallow water dam-break problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

Fangfang Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Research Centre for Fluids and Thermal Engineering, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, 315100, China
Nicholas Dodd*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper investigates a family of dam-break problems over an erodible bed. The hydrodynamics is described by the shallow water equations, and the bed change by a sediment-conservation equation, coupled to the hydrodynamics by a sediment transport (bed-load) law. When the initial states $\boldsymbol{U}_{l}$ and $\boldsymbol{U}_{r}$ are sufficiently close to each other the resulting solutions are consistent with the theory proposed by Lax (Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws and the Mathematical Theory of Shock Waves, 1973, SIAM), that for a Riemann problem of $n$ equations there are $n$ waves associated with the $n$ characteristic families. However, for wet–dry dam-break problems over a mobile bed, there are three governing equations, but only two waves. One wave vanishes because of the presence of the dry bed. When initial left and right bed levels ($B_{l}$ and $B_{r}$) are far apart, it is shown that a semi-characteristic shock may occur, which happens because, unlike in shallow water flow on a fixed bed, the flux function is non-convex. In these circumstances it is shown that it is necessary to reconsider the usual shock conditions. Instead, we propose an implied internal shock structure the concept of which originates from the fact that the stationary shock over a fixed-bed discontinuity can be regarded as a limiting case of flow over a sloping fixed bed. The Needham & Hey (Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, vol. 334, 1991, pp. 25–53) approximation for the ambiguous integral term $\int \!h\,\text{d}B$ in the shock condition is improved based on this internal shock structure, such that mathematically valid solutions that incorporate a morphodynamic semi-characteristic shock are arrived at.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernetti, R., Titarev, V. A. & Toro, E. F. 2008 Exact solution of the Riemann problem for the shallow water equations with discontinuous bottom geometry. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 32123243.Google Scholar
Cozzolino, L., Morte, R. D., Covelli, C., Giudice, G. D. & Pianese, D. 2011 Numerical solution of the discontinuous-bottom shallow-water equations with hydrostatic pressure distribution at the step. Adv. Water Resour. 34, 14131426.Google Scholar
Fraccarollo, L. & Capart, H. 2002 Riemann wave descriptions of erosional dam break flows. J. Fluid Mech. 461, 183228.Google Scholar
Grass, A. J.1981 Sediment transport by waves and currents. Tech. Rep. FL29. University College London, London Centre for Marine Technology.Google Scholar
Hibberd, S. & Peregrine, D. H. 1979 Surf and run-up on a beach: a uniform bore. J. Fluid Mech. 95, 323345.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, A. 1976 Quasilinear Hyperbolic Systems and Waves. Pitman.Google Scholar
Karelskii, K. V. & Petrosyan, A. S. 2006 Problem of steady-state flow over a step in the shallow-water approximation. Fluid Dyn. 41 (1), 1220.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. M.2009 Bore-driven swash on a mobile beach. PhD thesis, School of Civil Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. M. & Dodd, N. 2009 Floating grid characteristics method for unsteady flow over a mobile bed. Comput. Fluids 38, 899909.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. M. & Dodd, N. 2010 Beach face evolution in the swash zone. J. Fluid Mech. 661, 316340.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. F. 1963 The mechanics of dunes and antidunes in erodible-bed channels. J. Fluid Mech. 16 (4), 521544.Google Scholar
Lax, P. D. 1973 Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws and the Mathematical Theory of Shock Waves. SIAM.Google Scholar
Needham, D. J. & Hey, R. D. 1991 On nonlinear simple waves in alluvial river flows: a theory for sediment bores. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 334, 2553.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. & Hogg, A. J. 2005 On the transport of suspended sediment by a swash event on a plane beach. Coast. Engng 52, 123.Google Scholar
Ribas, F., Falqués, A., de Swart, H. E., Dodd, N., Garnier, R. & Calvete, D. 2015 Understanding coastal morphodynamic patterns from depth-averaged sediment concentration. Rev. Geophys. 53, 362410.Google Scholar
Ritter, A. 1892 Die Fortpflanzung der Wasserwellen. Zeitschrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure 36, 947954.Google Scholar
Sharma, V. D. 2010 Quasilinear Hyperbolic Systems, Compressible Flows, and Waves. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Soulsby, R. L.1997 Dynamics of marine sands; a manual for practical applications. SR 466. Hydraulics Research Wallingford, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Stoker, J. J. 1957 Water Waves. Interscience.Google Scholar
Toro, E. F. 2001 Shock-Capturing Methods for Free-Surface Shallow Flows. Wiley.Google Scholar
Toro, E. F. 2009 Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 3rd edn. Springer.Google Scholar
Valiani, A. & Caleffi, V. 2017 Momentum balance in the shallow water equations on bottom discontinuities. Adv. Water Resour. 100, 113.Google Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Waves. Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Zhu, F. & Dodd, N. 2013 Net beach change in the swash: a numerical investigation. Adv. Water Resour. 53, 1222.Google Scholar
Zhu, F. & Dodd, N. 2015 The morphodynamics of a swash event on an erodible beach. J. Fluid Mech. 762, 110140.Google Scholar
Zhu, F., Dodd, N. & Briganti, R. 2012 Impact of a uniform bore on an erodible beach. Coast. Engng 60, 326333.Google Scholar