Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T10:10:56.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Riccati-less approach for optimal control and estimation: an application to two-dimensional boundary layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2013

Onofrio Semeraro ,
Jan O. Pralits ,
Clarence W. Rowley  and
Dan S. Henningson
Onofrio Semeraro*
Affiliation:
Linné Flow Centre, KTH Mechanics SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Jan O. Pralits
Affiliation:
DICCA - Universitá degli studi di Genova I-161 45, Genova, Italy
Clarence W. Rowley
Affiliation:
MAE Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Dan S. Henningson
Affiliation:
Linné Flow Centre, KTH Mechanics SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The control of Tollmien–Schlichting waves in a two-dimensional boundary layer is analysed using numerical simulations. Full-dimensional optimal controllers are used in combination with a setup of spatially localized inputs (actuator and disturbance) and outputs (sensors). The adjoint of the direct-adjoint (ADA) algorithm, recently proposed by Pralits & Luchini (In Seventh IUTAM Symposium on Laminar–Turbulent Transition (ed. P. Schlatter & D. S. Henningson), vol. 18, 2010, Springer), is used to efficiently compute an optimal controller known as a linear quadratic regulator; the method is iterative and allows one to bypass the solution of the corresponding Riccati equation, which is infeasible for high-dimensional systems. We show that an analogous iteration can be made for the estimation problem; the dual algorithm is referred to as adjoint of the adjoint-direct (AAD). By combining the solutions of the estimation and control problem, full-dimensional linear quadratic Gaussian controllers are obtained and used for the attenuation of the disturbances arising in the boundary layer flow. The full-dimensional controllers turn out to be an excellent benchmark for evaluating the performance of the optimal control/estimation design based on reduced-order models. We show under which conditions the two strategies are in perfect agreement by focusing on the issues arising when feedback configurations are considered. An analysis of the finite-amplitude disturbances is also carried out by addressing the limitations of the optimal controllers, the role of the estimation, and the robustness to the nonlinearities arising in the flow of the control design.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary Layers Flow Control: Control theory Flow Control: Flow Control
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 731 , 25 September 2013 , pp. 394 - 417
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution licence .
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press.

References

Abergel, F. & Temam, R. 1990 On some control problems in fluid mechanics. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 1, 303–325.Google Scholar
Åkervik, E., Hœpffner, J., Ehrenstein, U. & Henningson, D. S. 2007 Optimal growth, model reduction and control in a separated boundary-layer flow using global eigenmodes. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 305–314.Google Scholar
Akhtar, I., Borggaard, J., Stoyanov, M. & Zietsman, L. 2010 On commutation of reduction and control: linear feedback control of a von Kármán Street. In 5th Flow Control Conference, pp. 1–14. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. & Liu, Y. 1989 Controller reduction: concepts and approaches. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 34, 802–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B. & Moore, J. 1990 Optimal Control: Linear Quadratic Methods. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bagheri, S., Brandt, L. & Henningson, D. S. 2009a Input–output analysis, model reduction and control design of the flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 620, 263–298.Google Scholar
Bagheri, S., Hœpffner, J., Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2009b Input–output analysis and control design applied to a linear model of spatially developing flows. Appl. Mech. Rev. 62 (2), 020803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamieh, B., Paganini, F. & Dahleh, M. 2002 Distributed control of spatially invariant systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 47 (7), 1091–1107.Google Scholar
Banks, H. T. & Ito, K. 1991 A numerical algorithm for optimal feedback gains in high dimensional linear quadratic regulator problems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 29 (3), 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechert, D. & Bartenwerfer, M. 1989 The viscous flow on surfaces with longitudinal ribs. J. Fluid Mech. 206, 105–129.Google Scholar
Belson, B. A., Semeraro, O., Rowley, C. W. & Henningson, D. S. 2013 Feedback control of instabilities in the two-dimensional Blasius boundary layer: the role of sensors and actuators. Phys. Fluids 25, 054106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, P. 2004 Solving large-scale control problems. Control Systems IEEE 24 (1), 44–59.Google Scholar
Benner, P., Li, J. & Penzl, T. 2008 Numerical solution of large-scale Lyapunov equations, Riccati equations, and linear-quadratic optimal control problems. Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 15, 755–777.Google Scholar
Bewley, T. R. 2001 Flow control: new challenges for a new renaissance. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 37, 21–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, T., Luchini, P. & Pralits, J. 2012 Methods for the solution of large optimal control problems that bypass open-loop model reduction. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control (submitted).Google Scholar
Bewley, T. R., Moin, P. & Temam, R. 2001 DNS-based predictive control of turbulence: an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms. J. Fluid Mech. 447, 179–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, T., Pralits, J. & Luchini, P. 2007 Minimal-energy control feedback for stabilization of bluff-body wakes based on unstable open-loop eigenvalues and left eigenvectors. In 5th Conference on Bluff Body Wakes and Vortex-Induced Vibrations (BBVIV-5), 12-15 December, Bahia, Brazil.Google Scholar
Borggaard, J. & Stoyanov, M. 2008 An efficient long-time integrator for Chandrasekhar equations. In 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3983–3988. IEEE.Google Scholar
Chevalier, M., Hœpffner, J., Åkervik, E. & Henningson, D. S. 2007a Linear feedback control and estimation applied to instabilities in spatially developing boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 588, 163–187.Google Scholar
Chevalier, M., Schlatter, P., Lundbladh, A. & Henningson, D. S. 2007b A pseudo spectral solver for incompressible boundary layer flows, Trita-Mek 7. KTH Mechanics, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Choi, H., Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1993 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets. J. Fluid Mech. 255, 503–539.Google Scholar
Corbett, P. & Bottaro, A. 2001 Optimal control of nonmodal disturbances in boundary layers. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 15 (2), 65–81.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. C., Glover, K., Khargonekar, P. P. & Francis, B. A. 1989 State-space solutions to standard ${H}_{2} $ and ${H}_{\infty } $ control problems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 34, 831–847.Google Scholar
Hammond, E. P., Bewley, T. R. & Moin, P. 1998 Observed mechanisms for turbulence attenuation and enhancement in opposition-controlled wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 10 (9), 2421–2423.Google Scholar
Hervé, A., Sipp, D., Schmid, P. J. & Samuelides, M. 2012 A physics-based approach to flow control using system identification. J. Fluid Mech. 702, 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Högberg, M., Bewley, T. R. & Henningson, D. S. 2003 Linear feedback control and estimation of transition in plane channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 481, 149–175.Google Scholar
Ilak, M. & Rowley, C. W. 2008 Modelling of transitional channel flow using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition. Phys. Fluids 20, 034103.Google Scholar
Juang, J. & Pappa, R. S. 1985 An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal paramter identification and model reduction. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 3 (25), 620–627.Google Scholar
Kailath, T. 1980 Linear Systems. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kim, J. & Bewley, T. R. 2007 A linear systems approach to flow control. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 383–417.Google Scholar
Lewis, F. L. & Syrmos, L. V. 1995 Optimal Control. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Losse, N. R., King, R., Zengl, M., Rist, U. & Noack, B. R. 2011 Control of Tollmien–Schlichting instabilities by finite distributed wall actuation. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 25 (1–4), 167–178.Google Scholar
Luchini, P., Manzo, F. & Pozzi, A. 1991 Resistance of a grooved surface to parallel flow and cross-flow. J. Fluid Mech. 228, 87–109.Google Scholar
Ma, Z., Ahuja, S. & Rowley, C. W. 2011 Reduced order models for control of fluids using the eigensystem realization algorithm. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 25 (1–4), 233–247.Google Scholar
Monokrousos, A., Brandt, L., Schlatter, P. & Henningson, D. S. 2008 DNS and LES of estimation and control of transition in boundary layers subject to free stream turbulence. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 29 (3), 841–855.Google Scholar
Moore, B. 1981 Principal component analysis in linear systems: controllability, observability, and model reduction. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 26 (1), 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordström, J., Nordin, N. & Henningson, D. S. 1999 The fringe region technique and the Fourier method used in the direct numerical simulation of spatially evolving viscous flows. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 20 (4), 1365–1393.Google Scholar
Pralits, J. O. & Luchini, P. 2010 Riccati-less optimal control of bluff-body wakes. In Seventh IUTAM Symposium on Laminar–Turbulent Transition (ed. Schlatter, P. & Henningson, D. S.), vol. 18. Springer.Google Scholar
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. & Flannery, B. P. 2007 Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quadrio, M. & Ricco, P. 2004 Critical assessment of turbulent drag reduction through spanwise wall oscillations. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 251–271.Google Scholar
Rowley, C. W. 2005 Model reduction for fluids using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition. Intl J. Bifurcation Chaos 15 (3), 997–1013.Google Scholar
Rowley, C. & Juttijudata, W. 2005 Model-based control and estimation of cavity flow oscillations. In 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 512–517. IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, P. J. 2007 Nonmodal stability theory. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 129–162.Google Scholar
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Springer.Google Scholar
Semeraro, O., Bagheri, S., Brandt, L. & Henningson, D. S. 2011 Feedback control of three-dimensional optimal disturbances using reduced-order models. J. Fluid Mech. 677, 63–102.Google Scholar
Sturzebecher, D. & Nitsche, W. 2003 Active cancellation of Tollmien–Schlichting waves instabilities on a wing using multi-channel sensor actuator systems. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 24, 572–583.Google Scholar
White, E. & Saric, W. 2000 Application of variable leading-edge roughness for transition control on swept wings. AIAA Paper 2000-283.Google Scholar
Zhou, K., Doyle, J. C. & Glover, K. 2002 Robust and Optimal Control. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar