Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:01:23.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response and receptivity of the hypersonic boundary layer past a wedge to free-stream acoustic, vortical and entropy disturbances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Fufeng Qin  and
Xuesong Wu
Fufeng Qin
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Xuesong Wu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, 180 Queen’s Gate, London SW7 2AZ, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyses the response and receptivity of the hypersonic boundary layer over a wedge to free-stream disturbances including acoustic, vortical and entropy fluctuations. Due to the presence of an attached oblique shock, the boundary layer is known to support viscous instability modes whose eigenfunctions are oscillatory in the far field. These modes acquire a triple-deck structure. Any of three elementary types of disturbance with frequency and wavelength on the triple-deck scales interacts with the shock to generate a slow acoustic perturbation, which is reflected between the shock and the wall. Through this induced acoustic perturbation, vortical and entropy free-stream disturbances drive significant velocity and temperature fluctuations within the boundary layer, which is impossible when the shock is absent. A quasi-resonance was identified, due to which the boundary layer exhibits a strong response to a continuum of high-frequency disturbances within a narrow band of streamwise wavenumbers. Most importantly, in the vicinity of the lower-branch neutral curve the slow acoustic perturbation induced by a disturbance of suitable frequency and wavenumbers is in exact resonance with a neutral eigenmode. As a result, the latter can be generated directly by each of three types of free-stream disturbance without involving any surface roughness element. The amplitude of the instability mode is determined by analysing the disturbance evolution through the resonant region. The fluctuation associated with the eigenmode turns out to be much stronger than the free-stream disturbances due to the resonant nature of excitation, and in the case of acoustic disturbances, to the well-known amplification effect of a strong shock. Moreover, excitation at the neutral position means that the instability mode grows immediately without undergoing any decay, or missing any portion of the unstable region. All these indicate that this new mechanism is particularly efficient. The boundary-layer response and coupling coefficients are calculated for typical values of parameters.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary layer receptivity Boundary Layers: Boundary layer stability Aerodynamics: High-speed flow
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 797 , 25 June 2016 , pp. 874 - 915
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balakumar, P.2003 Transition in a supersonic boundary layer due to roughness and acoustic disturbances. AIAA Paper 2003-3589.Google Scholar
Balakumar, P.2005 Transition in a supersonic boundary layer due to acoustic disturbances. AIAA Paper 2005-0096.Google Scholar
Balakumar, P. 2009 Receptivity of a supersonic boundary layer to acoustic disturbances. AIAA J. 47 (5), 1069–1078.Google Scholar
Balakumar, P. & Kegerise, M. A.2010 Receptivity of hypersonic boundary layers over straight and flared cones. AIAA Paper 2010-1545.Google Scholar
Blackby, N., Cowley, S. J. & Hall, P. 1993 On the instability of hypersonic flow past a flat plate. J. Fluid Mech. 247, 369–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. L., Malik, M. R. & Hussaini, M. Y.1990 Effects of shock on the stability of hypersonic boundary layers. AIAA Paper 1990-1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowley, S. J. & Hall, P. 1990 On the instability of hypersonic flow past a wedge. J. Fluid Mech. 214, 17–42.Google Scholar
Dietz, A. J. 1999 Local boundary-layer receptivity to a convected free-stream disturbance. J. Fluid Mech. 378, 291–317.Google Scholar
Dong, M. & Wu, X. 2013 On continuous spectra of Orr–Sommerfeld/Squire equations and entrainment of free-stream vortical disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 732, 616–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duck, P. W., Lasseigne, D. G. & Hussaini, M. Y. 1995 On the interaction between the shock wave attached to a wedge and freestream disturbances. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 7 (2), 119–139.Google Scholar
Duck, P. W., Lasseigne, D. G. & Hussaini, M. Y. 1997 The effect of three-dimensional freestream disturbances on the supersonic flow past a wedge. Phys. Fluids 9 (2), 456–467.Google Scholar
Duck, P. W., Ruban, A. I. & Zhikharev, C. N. 1996 Generation of Tollmien–Schlichting waves by free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 312, 341–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egorov, I. V., Fedorov, A. V. & Nechaev, A. V.2004 Recptivity of supersonic boundary layers on a blunt plate to acoustic disturbances. AIAA Paper 2004-0249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, A. V. 2003 Receptivity of a high-speed boundary layer to acoustic disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 491, 101–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, A. V. 2011 Transition and stability of high-speed boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 79–95.Google Scholar
Fedorov, A. V. & Khokhlov, A. P. 1991 Excitation of unstable modes in a supersonic boundary layer by acoustic waves. Fluid Dyn. 26 (4), 531–537.Google Scholar
Fedorov, A. V. & Khokhlov, A. P. 2001 Prehistory of instability in a hypersonic boundary layer. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 14 (6), 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaponov, S. A. 1977 Interaction between a supersonic boundary layer and acoustic disturbances. Fluid Dyn. 12 (6), 858–862.Google Scholar
Gaponov, S. A. 1993 Excitation of instability waves in the supersonic boundary layer by sound. In IUTAM Symposium on Nonlinear Instability of Nonparallel Flows, New York, USA (ed. Lin, S. P., Phillips, W. R. C. & Valentine, D. T.), Springer.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 1983 The evolution of Tollmien–Schlichting waves near a leading edge. J. Fluid Mech. 127, 59–81.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 1985 Scattering of acoustic waves into Tollmien–Schlichting waves by small streamwise variations in surface geometry. J. Fluid Mech. 154, 509–529.Google Scholar
Graziosi, P. & Brown, G. 2002 Experiments on stability and transition at Mach 3. J. Fluid Mech. 474, 83–124.Google Scholar
Hayes, W. D. & Probstein, R. F. 2004 Hypersonic Inviscid Flow. Dover.Google Scholar
Kendall, J. M. 1975 Wind tunnel experiments relating to supersonic and hypersonic boundary-layer transition. AIAA J. 13 (3), 290–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. A. 1992 Three-dimensional boundary-layer transition on a cone at Mach 3.5. Exp. Fluids 13, 305–314.Google Scholar
Kovasznay, L. S. G. 1953 Turbulence in supersonic flow. J. Aero. Sci. 20, 657–674.Google Scholar
Laufer, J. 1954 Fatcors affecting transition Reynolds numbers on models in supersonic wind tunnels. J. Aero. Sci. 21, 497–498.Google Scholar
Laufer, J. 1960 Aerodynamic noise in supersonic wind tunnels. J. Aero. Sci. 28, 685–692.Google Scholar
Ma, Y. & Zhong, X. 2003a Receptivity of a supersonic boundary layer over a flat plate. Part 1. Wave structures and interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 488, 31–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Y. & Zhong, X. 2003b Receptivity of a supersonic boundary layer over a flat plate. Part 2. Receptivity to freestream sound. J. Fluid Mech. 488, 79–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Y. & Zhong, X. 2005 Receptivity of a supersonic boundary layer over a flat plate. Part 3. Effects of different types of free-stream disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 532, 63–109.Google Scholar
Mack, L. M.1984 Boundary-layer linear stability theory. AGARD Rep. 709.Google Scholar
Maslov, A. A., Mironov, S. G., Kudryavtsev, A. N., Poplavskaya, T. V. & Tsyryulnokov, I. S. 2010 Wave processes in a viscous shock layer and control of fluctuations. J. Fluid Mech. 60, 81–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslov, A. A., Shiplyuk, A. N., Sidorenko, A. A. & Arnal, D. 2001 Leading-edge receptivity of a hypersonic boundary layer on a flat plate. J. Fluid Mech. 426, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, J. F. & Westphal, K. O. 1968 Interaction of linear waves with oblique shock waves. Phys. Fluids 11, 2350–2362.Google Scholar
Morkovin, M. V.1969 Critical evaluation of transition from laminar to turbulent shear layers with emphasis on hypersonically travelling bodies. Tech. Rep. AFFDL-TR, 68-149. US Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.Google Scholar
Patel, S. R. 1971 Supersonic boundary-layer transition: effects of roughness and free-stream disturbances. AIAA J. 9 (5), 797–803.Google Scholar
Petrov, G. V. 1984 Stability of thin viscous shock layer on a wedge in hypersonic flow of a perfect gas. In IUTAM Symposium on Laminar-Turbulent Transition, Novosibirsk, USSR (ed. Kozlov, V. V.). Springer.Google Scholar
Qin, F. & Wu, X.2016 Interaction of three-dimensional disturbances with an oblique shock in the presence of a downstream boundary: generalized shock conditions (in preparation).Google Scholar
Reshotko, E. 1976 Boundary layer stability and transition. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 8, 311–349.Google Scholar
Reshotko, E. 2008 Transition issues for atmospheric entry. J. Spacecr. Rockets 45 (2), 161–164.Google Scholar
Ribner, H. S. 1957 Reflection, transmission, and amplification of sound by a moving medium. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29 (4), 435–441.Google Scholar
Ruban, A. I. 1984 On Tollmien–Schlichting wave generation by sound. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza 5, 44–52.Google Scholar
Schneider, S. P. 2001 Effect of high-speed tunnel noise on laminar-turbulent transition. J. Spacecr. Rockets 38 (3), 323–333.Google Scholar
Seddougui, S. O. & Bassom, A. P. 1994 Nonlinear instability of viscous modes in hypersonic flow past a wedge. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 47 (4), 557–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semionov, N. V. & Kosinov, A. D. 1999 Experimental study of supersonic boundary layer receptivity in controlled conditions. In IUTAM Symposium on Laminar-Turbulent Transition, Arizona, USA (ed. Fasel, H. F. & Saric, W. S.), Springer.Google Scholar
Semionov, N. V. & Kosinov, A. D. 2008 An experimental study of receptivity of supersonic boundary layer on a blunted plate. Intl J. Mech. 2 (3), 87–95.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1989 On the first-mode instability in subsonic, supersonic or hypersonic boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 198, 127–153.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. & Brown, S. N. 1990 The inviscid instability of a Blasius boundary layer at large values of the Mach number. J. Fluid Mech. 219, 499–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X. 1999 Generation of Tollmien–Schlichting waves by convecting gusts interacting with sound. J. Fluid Mech. 397, 285–316.Google Scholar
Wu, X. 2001a On local boundary-layer receptivity to vortical disturbances in the free stream. J. Fluid Mech. 449, 373–393.Google Scholar
Wu, X. 2001b Receptivity of boundary layers with distributed roughness to vortical and acoustic disturbances: a second-order asymptotic theory and comparison with experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 431, 91–133.Google Scholar
Wu, X. 2014 On the role of acoustic feedback in boundary-layer instability. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 372 (2020), 20130347.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhong, X. 2001 Leading-edge receptivity to free-stream disturbance waves for hypersonic flow over a parabola. J. Fluid Mech. 441, 315–367.Google Scholar
Zhong, X. & Ma, Y. 2006 Boundary-layer receptivity of Mach 7.99 flow over a blunt cone to free-stream acoustic waves. J. Fluid Mech. 556, 55–103.Google Scholar
Zhong, X. & Wang, X. 2012 Direct numerical simulation on the receptivity, instability and transition of hypersonic boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 527–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar