Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:30:51.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Refraction-diffraction model for weakly nonlinear water waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

Philip L.-F. Liu
Affiliation:
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Ting-Kuei Tsay
Affiliation:
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853

Abstract

A model equation is derived for calculating transformation and propagation of Stokes waves. With the assumption that the water depth is slowly varying, the model equation, which is a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with variable coefficients, describes the forward-scattering wavefield. The model equation is used to investigate the wave convergence over a semicircular shoal. Numerical results are compared with experimental data (Whalin 1971). Nonlinear effects, which generate higher-harmonic wave components, are definitely important in the focusing zone. Mean free-surface set-downs over the shoal are also computed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1984 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berkhoff, J. C. W., Booy, N. & Radder, A. C. 1982 Verification of numerical wave propagation models for simple harmonic linear water waves. Coastal Engng 6, 255279.Google Scholar
Chu, V. H. & Mei, C. C. 1970 On slowly-varying Stokes waves. Rep. 125, Water Resources and Hydrodyn. Lab., Dept Civ. Enging, MIT.Google Scholar
Davey, A. & Stewartson, K. 1974 On three-dimensional packets of surface waves. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 338, 101110.Google Scholar
Djordjevic, V. D. & Redekopp, L. G. 1978 On the development of packets of surface gravity waves moving over an uneven bottom. Z. angew. Math. Phys. 29, 950962.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. T. & Dalrymple, R. A. 1983 A parabolic equation for the combined refraction-diffraction of Stokes waves by mildly varying topography. J. Fluid Mech. 136, 453466.Google Scholar
Liu, P. L.-F. & Tsay, T.-K. 1983a Water-wave motion around a breakwater on a slowly varying topography. In Proc. Coastal Structures '83, Specialty Conf. ASCE (ed. J. R. Weggel), pp. 974987. ASCE.
Liu, P. L.-F. & Tsay, T.-K. 1983b On weak reflection of water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 131, 5971.Google Scholar
Lozano, C. & Liu, P. L.-F. 1980 Refraction-diffraction model for linear surface water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 705720.Google Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. 1983 Wave jumps and caustics in the propagation of finite-amplitude water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 136, 435452.Google Scholar
Radder, A. C. 1979 On the parabolic equation method for water-wave propagation. J. Fluid Mech. 95, 159176.Google Scholar
Smith, G. D. 1978 Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.
Tsay, T.-K. & Liu, P. L.-F. 1982 Numerical solution of water wave refraction and diffraction problems in the parabolic approximation. J. Geophys. Res. 87, 79327940.Google Scholar
Whalin, R. W. 1971 The limit of applicability of linear wave refraction theory in a convergence zone. Res. Rep. H-71-3, U.S. Army Corps of Engrs, Waterways Expt Station, Vicksburg, MS.Google Scholar
Yue, D. K. P. & Mei, C. C. 1980 Forward diffraction of Stokes waves by a thin wedge. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 3352.Google Scholar