Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:42:55.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rayleigh–Bénard stability and the validity of quasi-Boussinesq or quasi-anelastic liquid approximations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2017

Thierry Alboussière*
Affiliation:
Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, ENS de Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5276 LGL-TPE, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
Yanick Ricard
Affiliation:
Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, ENS de Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5276 LGL-TPE, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

The linear stability threshold of the Rayleigh–Bénard configuration is analysed with compressible effects taken into account. It is assumed that the fluid under investigation obeys a Newtonian rheology and Fourier’s law of thermal transport with constant, uniform (dynamic) viscosity and thermal conductivity in a uniform gravity field. Top and bottom boundaries are maintained at different constant temperatures and we consider here mechanical boundary conditions of zero tangential stress and impermeable walls. Under these conditions, and with the Boussinesq approximation, Rayleigh (Phil. Mag., vol. 32 (192), 1916, pp. 529–546) first obtained analytically the critical value $27\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}^{4}/4$ for a dimensionless parameter, now known as the Rayleigh number, at the onset of convection. This paper describes the changes of the critical Rayleigh number due to the compressibility of the fluid, measured by the dimensionless dissipation parameter ${\mathcal{D}}$ and due to a finite temperature difference between the hot and cold boundaries, measured by a dimensionless temperature gradient $a$ . Different equations of state are examined: ideal gas equation, Murnaghan’s model (often used to describe the interiors of solid but convective planets) and a generic equation of state with adjustable parameters, which can represent any possible equation of state. In the perspective to assess approximations often made in convective models, we also consider two variations of this stability analysis. In a so-called quasi-Boussinesq model, we consider that density perturbations are solely due to temperature perturbations. In a so-called quasi-anelastic liquid approximation model, we consider that entropy perturbations are solely due to temperature perturbations. In addition to the numerical Chebyshev-based stability analysis, an analytical approximation is obtained when temperature fluctuations are written as a combination of only two modes, one being the original symmetrical (between top and bottom) mode introduced by Rayleigh, the other one being antisymmetrical. The analytical solution allows us to show that the antisymmetrical part of the critical eigenmode increases linearly with the parameters $a$ and ${\mathcal{D}}$ , while the superadiabatic critical Rayleigh number departs quadratically in $a$ and ${\mathcal{D}}$ from $27\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}^{4}/4$ . For any arbitrary equation of state, the coefficients of the quadratic departure are determined analytically from the coefficients of the expansion of density up to degree three in terms of pressure and temperature.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlers, G., Dressel, B., Oh, J. & Pesch, W. 2010 Strong non-Boussinesq efects near the onset of convection in a fluid near its critical point. J. Fluid Mech. 642, 1548.Google Scholar
Alboussière, T. & Ricard, Y. 2013 Reflections on dissipation associated with thermal convection. J. Fluid Mech. 725, R1.Google Scholar
Alboussière, T. & Ricard, Y. 2014 Reflections on dissipation associated with thermal convection – Corrigendum. J. Fluid Mech. 751, 749751.Google Scholar
Anderson, O., Isaak, D. & Oda, H. 1992 High-temperature elestic constant data on minerals relevant to geophysics. Rev. Geophys. 30 (1), 5790.Google Scholar
Anufriev, A., Jones, C. & Soward, A. 2005 The Boussinesq and anelastic liquid approximations for convection in the Earth’s core. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 12 (3), 163190.Google Scholar
Bormann, A. 2001 The onset of convection in the Rayleigh–Bénard problem for compressible fluids. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 13, 923.Google Scholar
Boussinesq, J. 1903 Théorie Analytique de la Chaleur, vol. 2. Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Braginsky, S. & Roberts, P. 1995 Equations governing convection in Earth’s core and the geodynamo. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 79, 197.Google Scholar
Busse, F. H. 1967 The stability of finite amplitude cellular convection and its relation to an extremum principle. J. Fluid Mech. 30 (4), 625649.Google Scholar
Durran, D. 1989 Improving the anelastic approximation. J. Atmos. Sci. 46 (11), 14531461.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, J., Laure, P. & Peyret, R. 1992 Large departure from Boussinesq approximation in the Rayleigh–Bénard problem. Phys. Fluids 4 (7), 13551372.Google Scholar
Giterman, M. & Shteinberg, V. 1970 Criteria of occurrence of free convection in a compressible viscous heat-conducting fluid. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 34 (2), 305311.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H. 1930 The instability of a compressible fluid heated below. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 26 (2), 170172.Google Scholar
Lantz, S. & Fan, Y. 1999 Anelastic magnetohydrodynamic equations for modeling solar and stellar convection zones. Astrophys. J. 121, 247264.Google Scholar
Lipps, F. 1990 On the anelastic approximation for deep convection. J. Atmos. Sci. 47 (14), 17941798.Google Scholar
Malkus, W.1964 Boussinesq Equations and Convection Energetics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Notes.Google Scholar
Mayer, H. & Kogan, A. 2002 Onset of convection in a very compressible fluid: the transient toward steady state. Phys. Rev. E 66, 056310.Google Scholar
Mihaljan, J. 1962 A rigorous exposition of the Boussinesq approximations. Astrophys. J. 136, 11261133.Google Scholar
Murnaghan, F. D. 1951 Finite Deformation of an Elastic Solid. Wiley.Google Scholar
Oberbeck, A. 1879 Über die Wärmeleitung des Flüssigkeiten bei Berücksichtigung des Strömungen infolge von Temperaturdifferenzen. Ann. Phys. Chem. 7, 271292.Google Scholar
Ogura, Y. & Phillips, N. 1961 Scale analysis of deep and shallow convection in the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 19, 173179.Google Scholar
Paolucci, S. & Chenoweth, D. R. 1987 Departures from the Boussinesq approximation in laminar Bénard convection. Phys. Fluids 30 (5), 15611564.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, J. 1916 On convection currents in a horizontal layer of fluid, when the higher temperature is on the under side. Phil. Mag. 32 (192), 529546.Google Scholar
Ricard, Y. 2007 Physics of Mantle Convection, Treatise on Geophysics, vol. 7. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, K. 1906 Über das Gleichgewicht des Sonnenatmosphäre. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen 1, 4153.Google Scholar
Spiegel, E. 1965 Convective instability in a compressible atmosphere. I. Astrophys. J. 141 (3), 10681090.Google Scholar
Spiegel, E. & Veronis, G. 1960 On the Boussinesq approximation for a compressible fluid. Astrophys. J. 131, 442447.Google Scholar
Weideman, J. A. & Reddy, S. C. 2000 A MATLAB differentiation matrix suite. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 26 (4), 465519.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Alboussière and Ricard supplementary material

Alboussière and Ricard supplementary material 1

Download Alboussière and Ricard supplementary material(File)
File 15.4 KB