Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:04:11.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The propagation of high-Reynolds-number non-Boussinesq gravity currents in axisymmetric geometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

MARIUS UNGARISH
MARIUS UNGARISH*
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider the propagation of a non-Boussinesq gravity current in an axisymmetric configuration (full cylinder or wedge). The current of density ρc is released from rest from a lock of radius r0 and height h0 into an ambient fluid of density ρa in a container of height H. When the Reynolds number is large, the resulting flow is governed by the parameters ρc/ρa and H* = H/h0. We show that the one-layer shallow-water model, carefully combined with a Benjamin-type front condition, provides a versatile formulation for the thickness and speed of the current, without any adjustable constants. The results cover in a continuous manner the range of light ρc/ρa ≪ 1, Boussinesq ρc/ρa ≈ 1, and heavy ρc/ρa ≫ 1 currents in a fairly wide range of depth ratio, H*. We obtain finite-difference solutions for the propagation and show that a self-similar behaviour develops for large times. This reveals the main features, in particular: (a) The heavy current propagates faster and its front is thinner than that for the light counterpart; (b) For large time, t, both the heavy and light currents spread like t1/2, but the thickness profiles display significant differences; (c) The energy-constrained propagation with the thickness of half-ambient-depth (when H* is close to 1) is a very limited occurrence, in contrast to the rectangular geometry counterpart in which this effect plays a major role. The predictions of the simple model are supported by some axisymmetric Navier–Stokes finite-difference simulations.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 643 , 25 January 2010 , pp. 267 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benjamin, T. B. 1968 Gravity currents and related phenomena. J. Fluid Mech. 31, 209–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birman, V. K., Martin, J. E. & Meiburg, E. 2005 The non-Boussinesq lock exchange problem. Part 2: High-resolution simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 537, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonometti, T. & Balachandar, S. 2008 Effect of Schmidt number on the structure and propagation of density currents. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 22, 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonometti, T. & Balachandar, S. 2009 Slumping of non-Boussinesq gravity currents of various initial fractional depths: a comparison between direct numerical simulations and a recent shallow-water model. Computers and Fluids, doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.11.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonometti, T., Balachandar, S. & Magnaudet, J. 2008 Wall effects in non-Boussinesq density currents. J. Fluid Mech. 616, 445–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantero, M., Balachandar, S. & Garcia, M. H. 2007 High resolution simulations of cylindrical density currents. J. Fluid Mech. 590, 437–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanneløp, T. K. & Jacobsen, Ø. 1984 Gravity spreading of heavy clouds instantaneously released. ZAMP 35, 559–584.Google Scholar
Gratton, J. & Vigo, C. 1994 Self-similar gravity currents with variable inflow revisited: plane currents. J. Fluid Mech. 258, 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, J. J. & Chyou, Y.-P. 1991 On the hydraulic lock-exchange problem. ZAMP 42, 874–910.Google Scholar
Lowe, R. J., Rottman, J. W. & Linden, P. F. 2005 The non-Boussinesq lock exchange problem. Part 1: Theory and experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 537, 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, M. D., Simpson, J. E., Dalziel, S. B. & van Heijst, G. J. F. 2006 Vortical motion in the head of an axisymmetric gravity current. Phys. Fluids 18, 046601(1–7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. E. 1997 Gravity Currents in the Environment and the Laboratory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ungarish, M. 2007 a Axisymmetric gravity currents at high Reynolds number: on the quality of shallow-water modelling of experimental observations. Phys. Fluids 19, 036602/7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungarish, M. 2007 b A shallow water model for high-Reynolds gravity currents for a wide range of density differences and fractional depths. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 373–382 (referred to as U).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungarish, M. 2009 An Introduction to Gravity Currents and Intrusions. Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungarish, M. & Huppert, H. E. 2004 On gravity currents propagating at the base of a stratified ambient: effects of geometrical constraints and rotation. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 69–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar