Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T18:51:52.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Particle–fluid interactions in grid-generated turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2007

C. POELMA ,
J. WESTERWEEL  and
G. OOMS
C. POELMA*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Aero and Hydrodynamics, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 21, 2628 CA Delft, The [email protected]
J. WESTERWEEL
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Aero and Hydrodynamics, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 21, 2628 CA Delft, The [email protected]
G. OOMS
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Aero and Hydrodynamics, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 21, 2628 CA Delft, The [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of small particles on decaying grid-generated turbulence is studied experimentally. Using a two-camera system, instantaneous fluid-phase and particle-phase measurements can be obtained simultaneously. The data obtained with this system are used to study the decay behaviour of the turbulent flow. The role of particle size, particle density and volume load is studied in a number of different cases. These cases are chosen so that the individual role of these parameters can systematically be evaluated. Addition of particles to the flow has significant effects on the decaying turbulence: first, the onset of the turbulent decay appears to shift upstream; second, the flow becomes anisotropic as it develops downstream. The latter is observed as an increase in integral length scale in the vertical direction. The rate at which the flow becomes anisotropic can be predicted using a new parameter: the product of the non-dimensional number density and the Stokes number (referred to as the ‘Stokes load’). This parameter, combining the relevant fluid and particle characteristics, is a measure for the energy redistribution leading to anisotropy. In addition to redistributing energy, the particles also produce turbulence. However, this only becomes evident when the grid-generated turbulence has decayed sufficiently, relatively far downstream of the grid. The turbulence production by particles can also account for the observed decrease in slope of the power spectrum, which leads to a ‘cross-over’ effect. The production of turbulence by the particles can be predicted using a model for the momentum deficit of the particle wakes. The validity of this approach is confirmed using conditional sampling of the fluid velocity field around the particles.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 589 , 25 October 2007 , pp. 315 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aliseda, A., Cartellier, A., Hainaux, F. & Lasheras, J. C. 2002 Effect of preferential concentration on the settling velocity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 468, 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagchi, P. & Balachandar, S. 2004 Response of the wake of an isolated particle to an isotropic turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 518, 95–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Townsend, A. A. 1948 Decay of isotropic turbulence in the initial period. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 193, 539–558.Google Scholar
Benedict, L. H. & Gould, R. D. 1998 Concerning time and length scale estimates made from burst-mode LDA autocorrelation measurements. Exps. Fluids 24, 246–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, M., Simonin, O. & Squires, K. D. 1998 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence modulation by particles in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 375, 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, M., Simonin, O. & Squires, K. D. 2000 On the prediction of gas-solid flows with two-way coupling using large eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 12, 2080–2090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, T. M. & Eaton, J. K. 2005 Fully resolved simulations of particle-turbulence interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 545, 67–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J. H., Wu, J. S. & Faeth, G. M. 2000 Turbulence generation in a homogeneous particle-laden flow. AIAA J. 38, 636–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comte-Bellot, G., Corrsin, S. 1966 The use of a contraction to improve the isotropy of grid-generated turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 657–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comte-Bellot, G., Corrsin, S. 1971 Simple Eulerian time correlations of full- and narrow-band velocity signals in grid-generated isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 273–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deen, N. G., Hjertager, B. H. & Solberg, T. 2000 Comparison of PIV and LDA measurement methods applied to the gas-liquid flow in a bubble column. Proc. 10th Intl Symp. on Appl. of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mech., Lisbon, Portugal. p. 38.5.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. K. & Fessler, J. R. 1994 Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 20, 169–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elghobashi, S. 1994 On predicting particle-laden turbulent flows. Appl. Sci. Res. 52, 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elghobashi, S. & Truesdell, G. C. 1993 On the two-way interaction between homogeneous turbulence and dispersed solid particles. I: Turbulence modification. Phys. Fluids 5, 1790–1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrante, A. & Elghobashi, S. 2003 On the physical mechanisms of two-way coupling in particle-laden isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 15, 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fessler, J. R., Kulick, J. D. & Eaton, J. K. 1994 Preferential concentration of heavy particles in a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 6, 3742–3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiss, S., Dreizler, A., Stojanovic, Z., Chrigui, M., Sadiki, A. & Janicka, J. 2004 Investigation of turbulence modification in a non-reactive two-phase flow. Exps. Fluids 36, 354–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, R. A. & Crowe, C. T. 1989 Effect of particle size on modulating turbulent intensity. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 15, 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetsroni, G. 1989 Particle-turbulence interaction. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 15, 735–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussainov, M., Karthushinsky, A., Rudi, Ü., Shcheglov, I., Kohnen, G., Sommerfeld, M. 2000 Experimental investigation of turbulence modulation by solid particles in a grid-generated vertical flow. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 21, 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiger, K. T. & Pan, C. 2000 PIV technique for the simultaneous measurement of dilute two-phase flows. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 122, 811–818.Google Scholar
Kiger, K. T. & Pan, C. 2002 Suspension and turbulence modification effects of solid particulates on a horizontal turbulent channel flow. J. Turbulence 3, no. 019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kussin, J. & Sommerfeld, M. 2002 Experimental studies on particle behaviour and turbulence modification in horizontal channel flow with different wall roughness. Exps. Fluids 33, 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1987 Fluid Mechanics. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lee, K., Faeth, G. M. & Chen, J.-H. 2003 Properties of particle-generated turbulence in the final-decay period. AIAA J. 41, 1332–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindken, R. & Merzkirch, W. 2002 A novel PIV technique for measurements in multiphase flows and its application to two-phase flows. Exps. Fluids 33, 814–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L'vov, V. S., Ooms, G. & Pomyalov, A. 2003 Effect of particle inertia on the turbulence in a suspension. Phys. Rev. E 67, 046314.Google Scholar
Maxey, M. R. & Riley, J. J. 1983 Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in nonuniform flow. Phys. Fluids 26, 883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ooms, G. & Poelma, C. 2004 Comparison between theoretical predictions and DNS-results for a decaying turbulent suspension. Phys. Rev. E 69, 056311.Google Scholar
Ooms, G. & Poesio, P. 2005 Effect of particle inertia and gravity on the turbulence in a suspension. Phys. Fluids 17, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parthasarathy, R. N. & Faeth, G. M. 1990 Turbulence modulation in homogeneous dilute particle-laden flow. J. Fluid Mech. 220, 485–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poelma, C. 2004 Experiments in particle-laden turbulence. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
Poelma, C. & Ooms, G. 2006 Particle-turbulence interaction in a homogeneous, isotropic turbulent suspension. Appl. Mech. Rev. 59, 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poelma, C., Westerweel, J. & Ooms, G. 2006 Turbulence statistics from optical whole-field measurements in particle-laden turbulence. Exps. Fluids 40, 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffel, W., Willert, C. & Kompenhans, J. 1998 Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreck, S. & Kleis, S. J. 1993 Modification of grid-generated turbulence by solid particles. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 665–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirivat, A. & Warhaft, Z. 1983 The effect of a passive cross-stream temperature gradient on the evolution of temperature variance and heat flux in grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 128, 323–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerfeld, M., Tsuji, T. & Crowe, C. T. 1997 Multiphase Flows with Droplets and Particles. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Squires, K. D. & Eaton, J. K. 1990 Particle response and turbulence modification in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 2, 1191–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, S. & Collins, L. 1999 a Collision statistics in an isotropic particle-laden turbulent suspension. Part 1. Direct numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 335, 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, S. & Collins, L. 1999 b A numerical study of the modulation of isotropic turbulence by suspended particles. J. Fluid Mech. 379, 105–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan-atichat, J., Nagib, H. M. & Loehrke, R. I. 1982 Interaction of free-stream turbulence with screens and grids. J. Fluid Mech. 114, 501–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ten Cate, A., Derksen, J. J., Portela, L. M., Kramer, H. J. M., Van den Akker, H. E. A. 2004 Fully resolved simulations of colliding monodisperse spheres in forces isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 519, 233–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuji, Y. & Morikawa, Y. 1982 LDV measurements of an air-solid two-phase flow in a horizontal pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 120, 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tummers, M. J. & Passchier, D. M. 2001 Spectral analysis of biased LDA data. Meas. Sci. Tech. 12, 1641–1650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Atta, C. W., Chen, W. Y. 1968 Correlation measurements in grid turbulence using digital harmonic analysis. J. Fluid Mech. 34, 497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyke, M. 1982 An Album of Fluid Motion. Stanford, USA: Parabolic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, M. R. & Stock, D. E. 1983 The effect of crossing trajectories on the dispersion of particles in a turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 136, 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerweel, J. 1993 Digital particle image velocimetry. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
Willert, C. E. 1997 Stereoscopic digital particle image velocimetry for application in wind tunnel flows. Meas. Sci. Tech. 8, 1465–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willert, C. E. & Gharib, M. 1991 Digital particle image velocimetry. Exps. Fluids 10, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, T. S. & Shy, S. S. 2005 The settling velocity of heavy particles in an aqueous near-isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 526, 171–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarin, L. P. & Hetsroni, G. 1994 Turbulence intensity in dilute two-phase flow-3; the particles-turbulence interaction in dilute two-phase flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 20, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Z. & Michaelides, E. E. 1992 Turbulence modulation in particulate flows - a theoretical approach. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 18, 779–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar