Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:51:00.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Particle motions near the bottom in turbulent flow in an open channel. Part 2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

B. Mutlu Sumer  and
Rolf Deigaard
B. Mutlu Sumer
Affiliation:
Technical University of Istanbul, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Tałkişkişla, Taksim, Istanbul, Turkey
Rolf Deigaard
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, Institute of Hydrodynamics and Hydraulic Engineering, DK-2800, Lyngby, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study continues the investigation of particle motions near the bottom in a turbulent open channel flow, reported by Sumer & Oguz (1978; hereafter referred to as part 1). Paths of suspended heavy particles were recorded in three dimensions and in time, employing a stereo-photogrammetric system coupled with a stroboscope. In the case of smooth bottom, the measured kinematical quantities concerning the particle motions were found to be in accord with the available information on the ‘bursting process’. Agreement between the particle motion and the bursting process provided further support for the mechanism of particle suspension near the bottom proposed in part 1. Similar experiments were carried out when the bottom was rough. Comparison between the smooth- and rough-bottom cases could be made on the same basis as the flow Reynolds number as well as the particle properties were kept almost unchanged in both the smooth and rough boundary experiments. The observations showed that particle motions close to the rough bottom are very similar in character to those in the smooth-bottom case. The findings of the present paper suggested that the suspension mechanism given for the smooth-boundary flow could be extended to the rough-boundary case.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 109 , August 1981 , pp. 311 - 337
Copyright
© 1981 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, J. E. & Francis, J. R. D. 1977 Saltation and suspension trajectories of solid grains in a water stream. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 284, 225.Google Scholar
Brodkey, R. S., Wallace, J. M. & Eckelmann, H. 1974 Some properties of truncated turbulence signals in bounded shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 209.Google Scholar
Engelund, F. 1970 A note on the mechanics of sediment suspension. Basic Res. Prog. Rep. Hydraulic Lab. Tech. Univ. Denmark 21, 7.Google Scholar
Grass, A. J. 1971 Structural features of turbulent flow over smooth and rough boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 50, 233.Google Scholar
Grass, A. J. 1974 Transport of fine sand on a flat bed: turbulence and suspension mechanics. Euromech 48, Inst. Hydrodyn. Hydraulic Engng Tech. Univ. Denmark, p. 33.
Henderson, F. M. 1966 Open Channel Flow. Macmillan.
Hinze, J. O. 1975 Turbulence. McGraw-Hill.
Jackson, R. G. 1976 Sedimentological and fluid-dynamic implications of the turbulent bursting phenomenon in geophysical flows. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 531.Google Scholar
Jacobi, O. 1979 Photogrammetric tracking of a particle in running water. Euromech 120, Fluid Mech. Dept. Tech. Univ. Denmark, paper 3.3.
Lee, M. K., Eckelman, L. D. & Hanratty, T. J. 1974 Identification of turbulent wall eddies through the phase relation of the components of the fluctuating velocity gradient. J. Fluid Mech. 66, 17.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. 1978 Two-phase and non-Newtonian flows. In Turbulence, 2nd edn (ed. P. Bradshaw), Topics in Applied Physics, vol. 12, p. 289. Springer.
Monin, A. S. & Yaglom, A. M. 1971 Statistical Fluid Mechanics: Mechanics of Turbulence, vol. 1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Nakagawa, H. & Nezu, I. 1977 Prediction of the contributions to the Reynolds stress from the bursting events in open channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 80, 99.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, H. & Nezu, I. 1978 Bursting phenomenon near the wall in open-channel flows and its simple mathematical model. Memoirs of the Fac. of Engng, Kyoto Univ. 40 (4), 213.Google Scholar
Nychas, S. G., Hershey, H. C. & Brodkey, R. S. 1973 A visual study of turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 61, 513.Google Scholar
Offen, G. R. & Kline, S. J. 1973 Experiments on the velocity characteristics of ‘bursts’ and on the interactions between the inner and outer regions of a turbulent boundary layer. Dept. Mech. Engng, Stanford Univ. Rep. MD-31.Google Scholar
Pratury, A. K. & Brodkey, R. S. 1978 A stereoscopic visual study of coherent structures in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 89, 251.Google Scholar
Sumer, B. M. & Deigaard, R. 1979 Experimental investigation of motions of suspended heavy particles and the bursting process. Inst. Hydrodyn. & Hydraulic Engng Tech. Univ. Denmark, Lyngby, Series Paper no. 23.
Sumer, B. M. & Oguz, B. 1978 Particle motions near the bottom in turbulent flow in an open channel. J. Fluid Mech. 86, 109.Google Scholar
Sutherland, A. J. 1967 Proposed mechanism for sediment entrainment by turbulent flow. J. Geophys. Res. 72, 6183.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. M., Brodkey, R. S. & Eckelman, H. 1977 Pattern recognized structures in bounded turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 83, 673.Google Scholar