Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T17:32:18.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A paradox of hovering insects in two-dimensional space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 December 2008

MAKOTO IIMA
MAKOTO IIMA*
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, N12W6, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A paradox concerning the flight of insects in two-dimensional space is identified: insects maintaining their bodies in a particular position (hovering) cannot, on average, generate hydrodynamic force if the induced flow is temporally periodic and converges to rest at infinity. This paradox is derived by using the far-field representation of periodic flow and the generalized Blasius formula, an exact formula for a force that acts on a moving body, based on the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Using this formula, the time-averaged force can be calculated solely in terms of the time-averaged far-field flow. A straightforward calculation represents the averaged force acting on an insect under a uniform flow, −〈V〉, determined by the balance between the hydrodynamic force and an external force such as gravity. The averaged force converges to zero in the limit 〈V〉 → 0, which implies that insects in two-dimensional space cannot hover under any finite external force if the direction of the uniform flow has a component parallel to the external force. This paradox provides insight into the effect of the singular behaviour of the flow around hovering insects: the far-field wake covers the whole space. On the basis of these assumptions, the relationship between this paradox and real insects that actually achieve hovering is discussed.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 617 , 25 December 2008 , pp. 207 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Betts, C. R. & Wootton, R. J. 1988 Wing shape and flight behaviour in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea): a preliminary analysis. J. Expl Biol. 138, 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondeaux, P. & Guglielmini, L. 2005 Chaotic flow generated by an oscillating foil. AIAA J. 43, 918–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, E. 1998 The far-field Oseen velocity expansion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 454, 2059–2082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, E. & Fishwick, N. 2007 Lift on slender bodies with elliptical cross section evaluated by using an Oseen flow model. SIAM J. Appl. Maths. 67, 1465–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childress, S. 1981 Mechanics of Swimming and Flying. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childress, S., Vandenberghe, N. & Zhang, J. 2006 Hovering of a passive body in an oscillating airflow. Phys. Fluids 18, 117103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, M. H. & Götz, K. G. 1993 Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low Reynolds numbers. J. Expl Biol. 174, 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F.-O. & Sane, S. P. 1999 Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284, 1954–1960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudley, R. 2000 The Biomechanics of Insect Flight. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. H. & Cheng, H. K. 1982 The separation vortex in the Weis-Fogh circulation-generation mechanism. J. Fluid Mech. 120, 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellington, C. P. 1984 The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305, 1–180.Google Scholar
Ellington, C. P., Berg, C., Willmott, A. P. & Thomas, A. L. R. 1996 Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature 384, 626–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iima, M. 2007 A two-dimensional aerodynamic model of freely flying insects. J. Theor. Biol. 247, 657–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iima, M. & Yanagita, T. 2001 a An analysis of a symmetric flapping model: a symmetry-breaking mechanism and its universality. Theor. Appl. Mech. 50, 237–245.Google Scholar
Iima, M. & Yanagita, T. 2001 b Is a two-dimensional butterfly able to fly by symmetric flapping? J. Phys. Soc. Japan 70, 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iima, M. & Yanagita, T. 2005 Asymmetric motion of a two-dimensional symmetric flapping model. Fluid Dyn. Res. 36, 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iima, M. & Yanagita, T. 2006 A transition of ascending flight to vertical hovering: a study of a symmetric flapping model. Europhys. Lett. 74, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, I. 1951 On the asymptotic behaviour of viscous fluid flow at a great distance from a cylindrical body, with special reference to Filon's paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 208, 487–516.Google Scholar
Imai, I. 1954 A new method of solving Oseen's equations and its application to the flow past an inclined elliptic cylinder. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 224, 141–160.Google Scholar
Imai, I. 1972 Some applications of function theory to fluid dynamics. In The Second International JSME Symp. Fluid Machinery and Fluidics, Tokyo, pp. 15–23.Google Scholar
Imai, I. 1974 Kasou shitsuryou to kasou undouryou–uzu undou he no ouyou (virtual mass and virtual angular momentum – an application to vortex motion; in Japanese). Abstr. Meeting of the Phys. Soc. Japan. Annual Meeting 29, 14–16.Google Scholar
Jones, K. D., Dohring, C. M. & Platzer, M. F. 1998 Experimental and computational investigation of the Knoller–Betz effect. AIAA J. 36, 1240–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, H. 1997 Hydrodynamics, 6th ed., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, H., Ellington, C. P., Kawachi, K., Berg, C. V. D. & Willmott, A. P. 1998 A computational fluid dynamic study of hawkmoth hovering. J. Expl Biol. 201, 461–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxworthy, T. 1979 Experiments on the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight. Part 1. Dynamics of the ‘fling’. J. Fluid. Mech. 93, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne-Thomson, L. M. 1968 Theoretical Hydrodynamics 5th edn., Dover.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noca, F., Shiels, D. & Jeon, D. 1997 Measuring instantaneous fluid dynamic forces on bodies, using only velocity fields and their derivatives. J. Fluids Struct. 11, 345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesavento, U. & Wang, Z. J. 2004 Falling paper: Navier–Stokes solutions, model of fluid forces, and center of mass elevation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 144501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, N. 1967 Oscillatory viscous flows. Review and extension. J. Inst. Maths Applics. 3, 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sane, S. P. & Dickinson, M. H. 2002 The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. J. Expl Biol. 205, 1087–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sane, S. P. & Jacobson, N. P. 2006 Induced airflow in flying insects II. Measurement of induced flow. J. Expl Biol. 209, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Z. J., Birch, J. B. & Dickinson, M. H. 2004 Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs. robotic wing experiments. J. Expl Biol. 207, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weis-Fogh, T. 1973 Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. J. Expl Biol. 59, 169–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J.-Z., Pan, Z.-L. & Lu, X.-Y. 2005 Unsteady fluid-dynamic forces solely in terms of control-surface integral. Phys. Fluids 17, 098102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar