Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:52:05.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the steady-state relations between disturbances above and below a critical level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

E. W. Graham
Affiliation:
Graham Associates, Shaw Island, WA 98286

Abstract

In studying the behaviour of a density-stratified shear flow difficulties are encountered at the ‘critical’ level where wave velocity equals fluid velocity.

Here a stratified shear layer of finite thickness is considered and a two-dimensional nonlinear steady-state problem is studied. It is assumed that blocking creates separate pockets of trapped fluid, each mixed to uniform density. These pockets are not in static equilibrium with the surrounding stratified fluid. They must be supported either by pressures dynamically developed in the curved flow along continuous streamlines outside the pockets or by centrifugal forces resulting from circulation within the pockets. The latter effect is considered only through evaluation of a crude ‘factor of importance’, FR, for the rotational effects and the pockets are assumed to be stagnant in the primary analysis.

For small but finite disturbance amplitude FR approaches zero, indicating that no correction of the primary analysis is required. A limiting Richardson number of unity appears. Above this limit the primary analysis gives no solutions and apparently the separate pockets of stagnant fluid merge to form a continuous stagnant insulating layer. This behaviour of the critical level (as a barrier to communication) resembles earlier results from transient linearized investigations although the two analyses have little in common except the existence of a critical level separating two fluid regions.

For moderate-to-large disturbance amplitudes the geometry of the flow pattern suggests Kelvin–Helmholtz billows. Rotational effects increase as the amplitude increases and may become significant at this stage. The primary analysis then becomes less accurate and cannot be used to exclude Kelvin–Helmholtz billows at Richardson numbers somewhat greater than unity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1982 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benney, D. J. & Ko, D. R. S. 1978 The propagation of long large amplitude internal waves. Stud. Appl. Math. 59, 187199.Google Scholar
Booker, J. R. & Bretherton, F. P. 1967 The critical layer of internal gravity waves in a shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 513539.Google Scholar
Bretherton, F. P. 1966 The propagation of groups of internal gravity waves in a shear flow. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 92, 466480.Google Scholar
Hines, C. O. & Reddy, C. A. 1966 On the propagation of atmospheric gravity waves through regions of wind shear. (Unpublished.)
Kelly, R. E. & Maslowe, S. A. 1970 The nonlinear critical layer in a slightly stratified shear flow. Stud. Appl. Math. 49, 301326.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1945 Hydrodynamics. Dover.
Margolis, S. B. & Su, C. H. 1978 Boundary-value problems in stratified shear flows with a nonlinear critical layer. Phys. Fluids 21, 12471259.Google Scholar
Maslowe, S. A. 1972 The generation of clear air turbulence by nonlinear waves. Stud. Appl. Math. 51, 116.Google Scholar
Maslowe, S. A. 1973 Finite-amplitude Kelvin-Helmholtz billows. Boundary-Layer Met. 5, 4352.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1961 On the stability of heterogeneous shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 496508.Google Scholar
Mollo-Christensen, E. 1978 Gravitational and geostrophic billows: some exact solutions. J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 13951398.Google Scholar