Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:15:02.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the spinup and spreadout of a Cartesian gravity current on a slope in a rotating system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2022

M. Ungarish Open the ORCID record for M. Ungarish [Opens in a new window]
M. Ungarish*
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ocean gravity currents flow along the inclined ocean floor for long times compared to the planet's rotation period. Their shape and motion is governed by the gravity buoyancy, Coriolis acceleration and friction-induced Ekman-layer spinup circulation. In order to understand this process, we consider the flow of a dense-fluid Boussinesq gravity current of fixed volume over an inclined bottom in a rotating system, in the framework of Cartesian 2.5-dimensional geometry (no dependency on the lateral direction $y$, but with a non-trivial $y$-component velocity $v$ due to Coriolis coupling with the main $u$ along the bottom $x$). After release from rest in a lock (co-rotating, with two gates creating propagation in ${\pm }x$-directions), the current forms a quasi-steady geostrophic ‘vein’ of parabolic height profile with a significant lateral velocity $v$. Subsequently, a spinup process, driven by the Ekman layers on the bottom and interface, appears and prevails for many revolutions, during which $v$ decays and the shape of the interface changes dramatically. We investigate the spinup motion, using an approximate model, for the case of large Rossby number, small Ekman number and small slope $\gamma$ (relevant to oceanic currents). We show that the initial shape of the natural geostrophic vein can be calculated rigorously (not an arbitrary parabola), and the initial lateral velocity $v(x,t=0)$ is counter-rotation about a fixed point (pivot) $x_{\rm \pi}$ at which $v(x_{\rm \pi},t) =0$ (at the beginning and during spinup). This point is placed excentrically, in the upper part, and this excentre, $\propto \gamma$, plays a significant role in the process. The spinup in a rigid container is developed as the prototype process; an essential component is the edge (outer wall) where the flux of the Ekman layer is arrested (and then returned to the centre via the inviscid core). While the upper part of the vein adopts this spinup pattern, the lower part (most of the vein, $x< x_{\rm \pi}$) develops a leak (drainage) at the edge that (a) modifies the spinup of the vein, and (b) generates a thin tail extension downslope. The tail consists of two merged non-divergent Ekman layers, which chokes the drainage flow rate. The present model provides clear-cut insights and some quantitative predictions of the major spinup stage by analytical algebraic solutions. A comparison with a previously published simple model (Wirth, Ocean Dyn., vol. 59, 2009, pp. 551–563) is presented. We also discuss briefly stability of the initial vein.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Gravity currents Geophysical and Geological Flows: Rotating flows
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 943 , 25 July 2022 , A31
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dai, A. & Wu, C.-S. 2016 High-resolution simulations of cylindrical gravity currents in a rotating system. J. Fluid Mech. 806, 71–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezer, T. & Weatherly, G.L. 1990 A numerical study of the interaction between a deep cold jet and the bottom boundary layer of the ocean. J. Phys. Oceangr. 20, 801–816.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, C., MacCready, P. & Rhines, P. 1993 Boundary mixing and arrested Ekman layers: rotating stratified flow near a sloping boundary. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 25 (1), 291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenspan, H.P. 1968 The Theory of Rotating Fluids. Cambridge University Press (Reprinted by Breukelen Press, Brookline, MA, 1990).Google Scholar
Griffiths, R.W. 1986 Gravity currents in rotating systems. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 18, 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallworth, M.A., Huppert, H.E. & Ungarish, M. 2001 Axisymmetric gravity currents in a rotating system: experimental and numerical investigations. J. Fluid Mech. 447, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H.E. 2006 Gravity currents: a personal perspective. J. Fluid Mech. 554, 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane-Serff, G.F. & Baines, P.G. 1998 Eddy formation by dense flows on slopes in a rotating fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 363, 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiburg, E., Radhakrishnan, S. & Nasr-Azadani, M. 2015 Modeling gravity and turbidity currents: computational approaches and challenges. Appl. Mech. Rev. 67, 040802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negretti, M.E., Tucciarone, F.L. & Wirth, A. 2021 Intruding gravity currents and re-circulation in a rotating frame: laboratory experiments. Phys. Fluids 33 (9), 096607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nof, D. 1983 The translation of isolated cold eddies on a sloping bottom. Deep-Sea Res. 30A, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salinas, J.S., Bonometti, T., Ungarish, M. & Cantero, M.I. 2019 Rotating planar gravity currents at moderate Rossby numbers: fully resolved simulations and shallow-water modelling. J. Fluid Mech. 867, 114–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salinas, J.S., Bonometti, T., Ungarish, M. & Cantero, M.I. 2020 Rotating planar gravity currents at moderate Rossby numbers: fully resolved simulations and shallow-water modelling – erratum. J. Fluid Mech. 891, E1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J.E. 1997 Gravity Currents in the Environment and Laboratory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ungarish, M. 2020 Gravity Currents and Intrusions – Analysis and Prediction. World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedemeyer, E.H. 1964 The unsteady flow within a spinning cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 20, 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirth, A. 2009 On the basic structure of oceanic gravity currents. Ocean. Dyn. 59 (4), 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirth, A. 2011 On the vanishing of interfacial Ekman layers. J. Phys. Oceangr. 41, 1035–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar