Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:51:58.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the robustness of emptying filling boxes to sudden changes in the wind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2019

John Craske Open the ORCID record for John Craske [Opens in a new window]  and
Graham O. Hughes Open the ORCID record for Graham O. Hughes [Opens in a new window]
John Craske*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Graham O. Hughes
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We determine the smallest instantaneous increase in the strength of an opposing wind that is necessary to permanently reverse the forward displacement flow that is driven by a two-layer thermal stratification. With an interpretation in terms of the flow’s energetics, the results clarify why the ventilation of a confined space with a stably stratified buoyancy field is less susceptible to being permanently reversed by the wind than the ventilation of a space with a uniform buoyancy field. For large opposing wind strengths we derive analytical upper and lower bounds for the system’s marginal stability, which exhibit a good agreement with the exact solution, even for modest opposing wind strengths. The work extends a previous formulation of the problem (Lishman & Woods, Build. Environ., vol. 44 (4), 2009, pp. 666–673) by accounting for the transient dynamics and energetics associated with the homogenisation of the interior, which prove to play a significant role in buffering temporal variations in the wind.

JFM classification

Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: Bifurcation Convection: Plumes/thermals Mixing: Turbulent mixing
Type
JFM Rapids
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 868 , 10 June 2019 , R3
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coomaraswamy, I. & Caulfield, C. 2011 Time-dependent ventilation flows driven by opposing wind and buoyancy. J. Fluid Mech. 672, 33–59.Google Scholar
Gladstone, C. & Woods, A. W. 2001 On buoyancy-driven natural ventilation of a room with a heated floor. J. Fluid Mech. 441, 293–314.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. O., Gayen, B. & Griffiths, R. W. 2013 Available potential energy in Rayleigh–Bérnard convection. J. Fluid Mech. 729, R3.Google Scholar
Hunt, G. R. & Linden, P. F. 2005 Displacement and mixing ventilation driven by opposing wind and buoyancy. J. Fluid Mech. 527, 27–55.Google Scholar
Kaye, N. B. & Hunt, G. R. 2004 Time-dependent flows in an emptying filling box. J. Fluid Mech. 520, 135–156.Google Scholar
Linden, P. F. 1999 The fluid mechanics of natural ventilation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31 (1), 201–238.Google Scholar
Linden, P. F., Lane-Serff, G. F. & Smeed, D. A. 1990 Emptying filling boxes: the fluid mechanics of natural ventilation. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 309–335.Google Scholar
Lishman, B. & Woods, A. W. 2009 On transitions in natural ventilation flow driven by changes in the wind. Build. Environ. 44 (4), 666–673.Google Scholar
Yuan, J. & Glicksman, L. R. 2008 Multiple steady states in combined buoyancy and wind driven natural ventilation: the conditions for multiple solutions and the critical point for initial conditions. Build. Environ. 43 (1), 62–69.Google Scholar