Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T10:51:57.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the nature of the dynamic contact angle: an experimental study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

Clifton G. Ngan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Elizabeth B. Dussan V.
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Abstract

The dynamic contact angle formed when silicone oil displaces air from the surface of glass has been measured. Even though the glass was neither treated in any special way nor cleaned by an elaborate technique, the standard deviation associated with our measurements was approximately 1·5°. A sequence of experiments revealed that the dynamic contact angle depends on both the speed at which the oil spreads across the glass and the size of the characteristic length scale associated with the device within which it is measured. It is shown that the latter implies directly that: (i) the measured and the actual contact angles are not the same; (ii) the usual hydrodynamic model for fluids is inadequate when a moving contact line is present. These conclusions are consistent with recent theoretical studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1982 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, T. D. & Haynes, J. M. 1969 Kinetics of liquid/liquid displacement. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 30, 421.Google Scholar
Blake, T. D. & Ruschak, K. J. 1979 A maximum speed of wetting. Nature 282, 489.Google Scholar
Dussan, V. E. B. 1976 The moving contact line: the slip boundary condition. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 665.Google Scholar
Dussan, V. E. B., 1979 On the spreading of liquids on solid surfaces: static and dynamic contact lines. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11, 371.Google Scholar
Greenspan, H. P. 1978 On the motion of a small viscous droplet that wets a surface. J. Fluid Mech. 84, 125.Google Scholar
Hansen, R. J. & Toong, T. Y. 1971a Interface behavior as one fluid completely displaces another from a small-diameter tube. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 36, 410.Google Scholar
Hansen, R. J. & Toong, T. Y. 1971b Dynamic contact angle and its relationship to forces of hydrodynamic origin. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 37, 196.Google Scholar
Hocking, L. M. 1977 A moving fluid interface. Part 2. The removal of the force singularity by a slip flow. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 209.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. 1975 A study of the advancing interface. I. Interface shape in liquid-gas systems. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 50, 228.Google Scholar
Huh, C. & Mason, S. G. 1977 The steady movement of a liquid meniscus in a capillary tube. J. Fluid Mech. 81, 401.Google Scholar
Inverarity, G. 1969 Dynamic wetting of glass fibre and polymer fibre. Brit. Polymer J. 1, 245.Google Scholar
Jiang, T.-S., Oh, S.-G. & Slattery, J. C. 1979 Correlation for dynamic contact angle. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 69, 74.Google Scholar
Kafka, F. Y. & Dussan, V. E. B., 1979 On the interpretation of dynamic contact angle in capillaries. J. Fluid Mech. 95, 539.Google Scholar
Lowndes, J. 1980 The numerical simulation of the steady movement of a fluid meniscus in a capillary tube. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 631.Google Scholar
Rose, W. & Heins, R. W. 1962 Moving interfaces and contact angle rate-dependence. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 17, 39.Google Scholar
Schonhorn, H., Frisch, H. L. & Kwei, T. K. 1966 Kinetics of wetting of surfaces by polymer melts. J. Appl. Phys. 37, 4967.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. M. & Tejada, S. B. 1972 Studies of dynamic contact angles on solids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 38, 359.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. M. & Tejada, S. B. 1970 N.A.S.A. Contract Rep. CR 7278.