Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:44:05.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the mechanism of turbulent drag reduction with super-hydrophobic surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2015

Amirreza Rastegari  and
Rayhaneh Akhavan
Amirreza Rastegari
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125, USA
Rayhaneh Akhavan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mechanism of turbulent drag reduction (DR) with super-hydrophobic (SH) surfaces is investigated by direct numerical simulation (DNS) and analysis of the governing equations in channel flow. The DNS studies were performed using lattice Boltzmann methods in channels with ‘idealized’ SH surfaces on both walls, comprised of longitudinal micro-grooves (MG), transverse MG, or micro-posts. DRs of $5\,\%$ to $83\,\%$, $-4\,\%$ to $20\,\%$, and $14\,\%$ to $81\,\%$ were realized in DNS with longitudinal MG, transverse MG, and micro-posts, respectively. By mathematical analysis of the governing equations, it is shown that, in SH channel flows with any periodic SH micro-pattern on the walls, the magnitude of DR can be expressed as $DR=U_{slip}/U_{bulk}+O({\it\varepsilon})$, where the first term represents the DR resulting from the effective slip on the walls, and the second term represents the DR or drag increase (DI) resulting from modifications to the turbulence dynamics and any secondary mean flows established in the SH channel compared to a channel flow with no-slip walls at the same bulk Reynolds number as the SH channel. Comparison of this expression to DNS results shows that, with all SH surface micro-patterns studied, between 80 % and 100 % of the DR in turbulent flow arises from the effective slip on the walls. Modifications to the turbulence dynamics contribute no more than 20 % of the total DR with longitudinal MG or micro-posts of high shear-free fraction (SFF), and a DI with transverse MG or micro-posts of moderate SFF. The effect of the SH surface on the normalized dynamics of turbulence is found to be small in all cases, and confined to additional production of turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) within a thin ‘surface layer’ of thickness of the order of the width of surface micro-indentations. Outside of this ‘surface layer’, the normalized dynamics of turbulence proceeds as in a turbulent channel flow with no-slip walls at the friction Reynolds number of the SH channel flow.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Turbulence control Turbulent Flows: Turbulence simulation Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers
Type
Rapids
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 773 , 25 June 2015 , R4
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benzi, R., Biferale, L., Sbragaglia, M., Succi, S. & Toschi, F. 2006 Mesoscopic modelling of heterogeneous boundary conditions for microchannel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 548, 257–280.Google Scholar
Bushnell, D. & Hefner, J. N.1990 Viscous drag reduction in boundary layers. Progress In Astronautics and Aeronautics (ed. D. Bushell & N. J. Hefner), vol. 123. AIAA.Google Scholar
Davis, A. M. J. & Lauga, E. 2009 Geometric transition in friction for flow over a bubble mattress. Phys. Fluids 21, 011701.Google Scholar
Davis, A. M. J. & Lauga, E. 2010 Effective slip in pressure-driven Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 661, 402–411.Google Scholar
Daniello, R. J., Waterhouse, N. E. & Rothstein, J. P. 2009 Drag reduction in turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 21, 085103.Google Scholar
Fukagata, K., Iwamoto, K. & Kasagi, N. 2002 Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin-friction in wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 14, L73–L76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukagata, K., Kasagi, N. & Koumoutsakos, P. 2006 A theoretical prediction of friction drag reduction in turbulent flow by superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 18, 051703.Google Scholar
Hinze, J. O. 1975 Turbulence. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jelly, T. O., Jung, S. Y. & Zaki, T. A. 2014 Turbulence and skin friction modification in channel flow with streamwise-aligned superhydrophobic surface texture. Phys. Fluids 26, 095102.Google Scholar
Karatay, E., Haase, A. S., Visser, C. W., Sun, C., Lohse, D., Tsai, P. A. & Lammertink, R. G. 2013 Control of slippage with tunable bubble mattresses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8422–8426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lauga, E. & Stone, H. A. 2003 Effective slip in pressure-driven Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 489, 55–77.Google Scholar
Martel, M., Perot, J. B. & Rothstein, J. P. 2009 Direct numerical simulations of turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 620, 31–41.Google Scholar
Martel, M. B., Rothstein, J. P. & Perot, J. B. 2010 An analysis of superhydrophobic turbulent drag reduction mechanisms using direct numerical simulation. Phys. Fluids 22, 065102.Google Scholar
Min, T. & Kim, J. 2004 Effect of superhydrophobic surfaces on skin-friction drag. Phys. Fluids 16, L55.Google Scholar
Ou, J., Perot, J. B. & Rothstein, J. P. 2004 Laminar drag reduction in microchannels using ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 16, 4635.Google Scholar
Ou, J. & Rothstein, J. P. 2005 Direct velocity measurements of the flow past drag reducing ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 17, 103606.Google Scholar
Park, H., Park, H. & Kim, J. 2013 A numerical study of the effects of superhydrophobic surface on skin-friction drag in turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 25, 110815.Google Scholar
Park, H., Sun, G. & Kim, C.-J. 2014 Superhydrophobic turbulent drag reduction as a function of surface grating parameters. J. Fluid Mech. 747, 722–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peet, Y. & Sagaut, P. 2009 Theoretical prediction of turbulent skin friction on geometrically complex surfaces. Phys. Fluids 21, 105105.Google Scholar
Peguero, C. & Bruer, K. 2009 On drag reduction in turbulent channel flow over superhydrophobic surfaces. In Advances in Turbulence XII (ed. Eckhardt, B.), pp. 233–236. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, H. J. 1970 The formation of streamwise vorticity in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 721–740.Google Scholar
Philip, J. R. 1972 Flows satisfying mixed no-slip and no-shear conditions. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 23, 353–372.Google Scholar
Rastegari, A. & Akhavan, R. 2013 Lattice Boltzmann simulations of drag reduction by super-hydrophobic surfaces. In Proceedings of 14th European Turbulence Conference, September 1–4, 2013.Google Scholar
Rothstein, J. P. 2010 Slip on superhydrophobic surfaces. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbragaglia, M. & Prosperetti, A. 2007 A note on the effective slip properties for microchannel flows with ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 19, 043603.Google Scholar
Succi, S. 2001 The Lattice Boltzmann Equation for Fluid Dynamics and Beyond. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberger, A., Cottin-Bizonne, C., Kleimann, P. & Charlaix, E. 2007 High friction on a bubble mattress. Nat. Mater. 6, 665–668.Google Scholar
Tsai, P., Peters, A. M., Pirat, C., Wessling, M., Lammertink, R. G. H. & Lohse, D. 2009 Quantifying effective slip length over micropatterned hydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 21, 112002.Google Scholar
Türk, S., Daschiel, G., Stroh, A., Hasegawa, Y. & Frohnapfel, B. 2014 Turbulent flow over superhydrophobic surfaces with streamwise grooves. J. Fluid Mech. 747, 186–217.Google Scholar
Voronov, R. S. & Papavassiliou, D. V. 2008 Review of fluid slip over superhydrophobic surfaces and its dependence on the contact angle. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47, 2455–2477.Google Scholar
Watanabe, K., Ugadawa, Y. & Ugadawa, H. 1999 Drag reduction of Newtonian fluid in a circular pipe with a highly water-repellent wall. J. Fluid Mech. 381, 225–238.Google Scholar
Woolford, B., Prince, J., Maynes, D. & Webb, B. W. 2009 Particle immage velocimetry charactrization of turbulent channel flow with rib patterned superhydrophobic walls. Phys. Fluids 21, 085106.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Rastegari et al. supplementary material

Supplementary material

Download Rastegari et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 167.1 KB