Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:34:12.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the evidence for the effect of bubble interference on cavitation noise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

Vijay H. Arakeri  and
V. Shanmuganathan
Vijay H. Arakeri
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560 012, India
V. Shanmuganathan
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560 012, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cavitation-noise measurements from an axisymmetric body with ‘controlled’ generation of cavitation are reported. The control was achieved by seeding artificial nuclei in the boundary layer by electrolysis. It was possible to alter the number density of nuclei by varying the electrolysis voltage, polarity and the geometry of the electrode. From the observed trend of cavitation-noise data it is postulated that there exists an ‘interference effect’ which influences cavitation noise. When the nucleus-number density is high and cavitation numbers are low this effect is strong. Under these conditions the properties of cavitation noise are found to differ considerably from those expected based on theories concerning noise from single-spherical-bubble cavitation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 159 , October 1985 , pp. 131 - 150
Copyright
© 1985 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arakeri, V. H. & Acosta, A. J. 1973 Viscous effects in the inception of cavitation on axisymmetric bodies. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 95, 519.Google Scholar
Blake, W. K., Wolpert, M. J. & Geib, F. E. 1977 Cavitation noise and inception as influenced by boundary layer development on a hydrofoil. J. Fluid Mech. 80, 617.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, H. & Strasberg, M. 1956 Hydrodynamic sources of sound. 2nd Symp. Naval Hydrodynamics, Washington, D.C. 241.
Flynn, H. G. 1964 Physics of acoustic cavitation in liquids. In Physical Acoustics (ed. W. P. Mason), vol. 1 (Part B), p. 57. Academic.
Gates, E. M. 1977 The influence of free stream turbulence, free stream nuclei populations and a drag-reducing polymer on cavitation inception on two axisymmetric bodies. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.
Gates, E. M., Billet, M. L., Katz, J., Ooi, K. K., Holl, J. W. & Acosta, A. J. 1979 Cavitation inception and nuclei distribution. Joint ARL/CIT experiments. Calif. Inst. of Tech. Rep. no. E244.1.
Harrison, M. 1952 An experimental study of single bubble cavitation noise. D.T.M.B. Rep. no. 815. DTNSRDC, Washington, D.C.
Keller, A. P. 1972 The influence of the cavitation nucleus spectrum on cavitation inception, investigated with a scattered light counting method. Trans. ASME D: J. Basic Engng 94, 917.Google Scholar
Knapp, R. T. & Hollander, A. 1948 Laboratory investigations of the mechanism of cavitation, Trans. A.S.M.E. 70, 419.Google Scholar
Plesset, M. S. 1949 The dynamics of cavitation bubbles. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 16, 277.Google Scholar
Rayleigh (Lord) 1917 On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity. Phil. Mag. 34, 94.Google Scholar
Schiebe, F. R. 1972 Measurements of the cavitation susceptibility of water using standard bodies. St Anthony Fall Hyd. Lab. Rep. no. 118. University of Minnesota.
Shanmuganathan, V. 1984 Experimental studies on travelling bubble cavitation. Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.
Vander Muelen, J. H. J. 1976 A holographic study of cavitation on axisymmetric bodies and the influence of polymer additives. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands.