Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:49:42.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the nonlinear development of the Batchelor–Nitsche instability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

M. R. E. Proctor
M. R. E. Proctor
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver St., Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The nonlinear development of the Batchelor–Nitsche instability (of a periodically stratified fluid) is considered, utilizing the disparity between vertical and horizontal scales of motion. The resulting evolution equation is used to show that the preferred pattern of convection takes the form of rolls, and that the motion evolves to larger and larger horizontal scales as time increases.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 254 , September 1993 , pp. 313 - 321
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. & Nitsche, J. M. 1991 Instability of stationary unbounded stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 357–391 (referred to herein as BN.)Google Scholar
Chapman, C. J. & Proctor, M. R. E. 1980 Nonlinear Rayleigh–Bénard convection between poorly conducting boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 759–782.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D. R. & Proctor, M. R. E. 1984 The transition from roll to square cell solutions in Rayleigh-Bénard convection. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 461–471.Google Scholar
Proctor, M. R. E. 1981 Planform selection by finite amplitude convection between poorly conducting slabs. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 469–485.Google Scholar
Proctor, M. R. E. & Holyer, J. Y. 1985 Planform selection in salt fingers. J. Fluid Mech. 168, 241–253.Google Scholar