Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T21:53:36.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-linearity, relaxation and diffusion in acoustics and ultrasonics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

D. F. Parker
D. F. Parker
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical Mechanics, The University, Nottingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As they propagate through a gas, fluctuating pressure signals of moderate amplitude and of ultrasonic frequency are affected by amplitude dispersion, by relaxation damping and, particularly in ‘shock layers’, by diffusive damping. We derive a ‘high frequency’ theory including all these effects, for disturbances of arbitrary wave form excited by a wide variety of boundary conditions. By introducing a phase variable α, and taking account of non-linearity, we show how the signal propagates along the rays of linear acoustics theory, with constantly changing wave profile.

Relaxation dampens the signal, as for linear acoustics, and also diminishes amplitude dispersion. A criterion for shock formation is given, and the importance of non-linearity for signal attenuation exhibited. As shocks form, α surfaces coalesce and diffusive mechanisms are accentuated. Whitham's area rule is shown to be relevant for unsteady three-dimensional flows in relaxing gases, and is used to compute the attentuation of an ultrasonic beam. Supersonic relaxing flow over a wavy wall is also analyzed, and focusing effects are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , 15 December 1969 , pp. 793 - 815
Copyright
© 1969 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beyer, R. T. 1965 Nonlinear acoustics. In Physical Acoustics, vol. IIB (ed. W. P. Mason). New York: Academic.
Blackstock, D. J. 1965 The connexion between the Fay and Fubini solutions for plane sound waves of finite amplitude J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 39, 1019–26.Google Scholar
Bretherton, F. P. & Garrett, C. J. R. 1968 Wave trains in inhomogeneous moving media Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A302, 529–44.Google Scholar
Courant, R. & Friedrichs, K. O. 1948 Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves. New York: Interscience.
Courant, R. & Hilbert, D. 1965 Methods of Mathematical Physics, vol. II. New York: Interscience.
Friedrichs, K. O. 1948 Formation and decay of shock waves Comm. Pure and Appl. Maths. 1, 211–46.Google Scholar
Hirshfelder, J. O., Curtis, C. F. & Bird, R. B. 1964 Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids, corrected printing. New York: Wiley.
Krasil'Nikov, V. A. 1963 Sound and Ultrasound Waves. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations. (English ed.).
Lighthill, M. J. 1956 Viscosity effects in sound waves of finite amplitude. In Surveys in Mechanics (ed. G. K. Batchelor and R. M. Davies). Cambridge University Press.
Lighthill, M. J. 1960 Higher Approximations in Aerodynamic Theory. Princeton University Press.
Parker, D. F. 1968 Yale University Department of Engineering and Applied Science Report.
Parker, D. F. & Varley, E. 1968 The interaction of finite amplitude deflection and stretching waves in elastic membranes and strings Q. J. M. Appl. Maths. 21, 329–52.Google Scholar
Varley, E. 1965 Simple waves in general elastic materials Archs. Ration. Mech. Analysis, 20, 309–28.Google Scholar
Varley, E. & Cumberbatch, E. 1965 Non-linear theory of wavefront propagation J. Inst. Math. Applics. 1, 101–112.Google Scholar
Varley, E. & Dunwoody, J. 1965 The effect of non-linearity at an acceleration wave J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 13, 17–28.Google Scholar
Varley, E. & Rogers, T. G. 1967 The propagation of high frequency, finite acceleration pulses and shocks in viscoelastic materials Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A296, 498–518.Google Scholar
Vincenti, W. G. 1959 Non-equilibrium flow over a wavy wall J. Fluid Mech. 6, 481–496.Google Scholar
Vincenti, W. G. & Kruger, C. H. 1965 Introduction to Physical Gas Dynamics. New York: Wiley.
Whitham, G. B. 1952 The flow pattern of a supersonic projectile Communs. Pure Appl. Math. 5, 301–348.Google Scholar