Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:54:39.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-linear effects in steady supersonic dissipative gasdynamics Part 1. Two-dimensional flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

T. H. Chong  and
L. Sirovich
T. H. Chong
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Mathematics and Centre for Fluid Dynamics, Brown University
L. Sirovich
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Mathematics and Centre for Fluid Dynamics, Brown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Steady supersonic two-dimensional flows governed by the Navier–Stokes equations are considered. For flows past a thin body, the Oseen theory is shown to fail at large distances. An investigation of the equations bridging the linear and non-linear zones is made. From this, it follows that the resulting equations are a system of Burgers and diffusion equations. The Whitham theory is shown to result under the inviscid limit of our analysis. Various other limits are also obtained.

An explicit expression for flows past a thin airfoil is given, and the flow past a double wedge is exhibited in terms of known functions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , 15 November 1971 , pp. 161 - 176
Copyright
© 1971 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burgers, J. M. 1948 A mathematical model illustrating the theory of turbulence. Advances in Applied Mechanics, 1, 171.Google Scholar
Chong, T. H. & Sirovich, L. 1970 On the structure of three dimensional linearized supersonic and hypersonic flows. Phys. Fluids, 13, 1990.Google Scholar
Cole, J. D. 1951 On a quasi-linear parabolic equation occurring in aerodynamics. Quart. Appl. Math. 9, 225.Google Scholar
Hayes, W. D. 1960 Gasdynamic discontinuities. Princeton Aeronautical Paperbacks.
Hopf, E. 1950 The partial differential equation ut + uux = mUuxx. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 3, 201.Google Scholar
Ladyzhenskaya, A. 1956 On the construction of discontinuous solutions of quasilinear hyperbolic equations as limits to the solution of the respective parabolic equations when the viscosity coefficient is approaching zero. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 2, 291.Google Scholar
Lax, P. D. 1957 Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. II. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 10, 537.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1956 Viscosity effects in sound waves of finite amplitude. Surveys in Mechanics (ed. G. K. Batchelor and R. M. Davies). Cambridge University Press.
Moran, J. P. & Shen, S. F. 1966 On the formation of weak plane shock waves by impulsive motion of a piston. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 705.Google Scholar
Olejnik, O. A. 1956 On discontinuous solutions of nonlinear differential equations. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 109, 1098.Google Scholar
Parker, D. F. 1969 Nonlinearity, relaxation, and diffusion in acoustics and ultrasonics. J. Fluid Mech. 39, 793.Google Scholar
Ryzhov, O. S. & Terent'ev, E. D. 1967 On perturbations associated with the creation of lift acting on a body in a transonic stream of a dissipative gas. Prikl. Mat. Mech. 31, 1035.Google Scholar
Sirovich, L. 1968 Steady gasdynamic flows. Phys. Fluids, 11, 1424.Google Scholar
Su, C. H. & Gardner, C. S. 1969 Derivation of the Korteweg-deVries equation and Burgers equation. J. Math. Phys. 10, 536.Google Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1950 The behaviour of supersonic flow past a body of revolution, far from the axis. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 201, 89.Google Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1952 The flow pattern of a supersonic projectile. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 5, 301.Google Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1956 On the propagation of weak shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 290.Google Scholar