Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:57:31.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new boundary layer resonance enhanced by wave modulation: theory and experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

J. J. Healey
J. J. Healey
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When more than one wave is present in a system there exists the possibilty of a resonant interaction. Resonant modes become nonlinear at smaller amplitudes than nonresonant modes. If the nonlinearity causes increased growth rates then it may be that, for a time at least, the behaviour of the resonant modes will be the dominant feature. In shear layers resonant triads can be found where two oblique modes resonate with a plane wave and this case has received much attention in the literature. For a given plane wave, the resonance condition selects oblique modes of a certain wave angle and agreement has been found between predicted wave angles and those measured in experiments.

In this paper it is shown that resonance conditions can also be met between two planar waves in a Blasius boundary layer, where one of the waves is the usual unstable mode, and the other is a higher-order damped mode. The effects of wave modulation are modelled by performing a spatial analysis but allowing the frequency to become complex. It is found that for certain complex frequencies the strength of the nonlinear resonant interaction coefficients is greatly increased. Experiments have been performed in a low-turbulence wind tunnel in which disturbances with modulated and unmodulated sections were introduced into the boundary layer over a flat plate. It was found that disturbances with the frequency and modulation predicted by the theory do indeed show a much greater susceptibility to nonlinear breakdown than nonresonant disturbances.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 304 , 10 December 1995 , pp. 231 - 262
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertolotti, F. P., Herbert, T. & Spalart, P. R. 1992 J. Fluid Mech. 242, 441–474.
Bodonyi, R. J. & Smith, F. T. 1981 Proc. R. Soc. Land. A 375, 65–92.
Craik, A. D. D. 1971 J. Fluid Mech. 50, 393–413.
Crajk, A. D. D. 1985 Wave Interactions and Fluid Flows. Cambridge University Press. DAVEY, A. 1982 In Stability in the Mechanics ofContinua (ed. F. H. Schroeder), pp. 365–372. Springer.
Faroe, M. 1992 Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 395–457.
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. & Guo, Y. P. 1991 J. Fluid Mech. 224, 507–529.
Caster, M. 1979 In Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Laminar-Turbulent Transition (ed. R. Eppler & H. Fasel), pp. 14–16. Springer.
Gaster, M. 1990 Proc. R. Soc. Land. A 430, 3–24.
Glendinning, P. & Sparrow, C. 1984 J. Statist. Phys. 35, 645–696.
Goldstein, M. E. & Lee, S. S. 1992 J. Fluid Mech. 245, 523–551.
Guckenheimer, J. & Holmes, P. 1986 Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. 2nd edn. Springer.
Healey, J. J. 1993 J. Fluid Mech. 255, 667–681.
Healey, J. J. 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1107–1109.
Healey, J. J. 1995 J. Fluid Mech. 288, 59–73.
Healey, J. J. 1995 In Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Laminar-Turbulent Transition (ed. R. Kobayashi), pp. 437–444. Springer.
Healey, J. J. 1995c A comparison between Orr-Sommerfeld theory and asymptotic theories for damped and growing boundary layer modes. J. Fluid Mech. (Submitted).Google Scholar
Healey, J. J., Broomhead, D. S., Cliffe, K. A., Jones, R. & Mullin, T. 1991 Physica D 48, 322–339.
Hickernell, F. J. 1984 J. Fluid Mech. 142, 431–449.
Hocking, L. M. 1975 Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 28, 341–353.
Hughes, D. W. & Proctor, M. R. E. 1990 Physica D 46, 163–176.
Hughes, D. W. & Proctor, M. R. E. 1992 J. Fluid Mech. 244, 583–604.
Hultgren, L. S. 1987 Phys. Fluids 30, 2947–2951.
Ince, E. L. 1956 Ordinary Differential Equations. Dover.
Kelly, R. E. 1968 J. Fluid Mech. 31, 789–799.
Klingmann, B. G. B., Boiko, A. V., Westin, K. J. A., Kozlov, V. V. & Alfredsson, P. H. 1993 Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 12, 493–514.
Lin, C. C. 1955 The Theory of Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.
Mankbadi, R. R., Wu, X. & Lee, S. S. 1993 J. Fluid Mech. 256, 85–106.
Proctor, M. R. E. & Jones, C. A. 1988 J. Fluid Mech. 188, 301–335.
Raetz, G. S. 1959 A new theory of the cause of transition in fluid flows. Norair, Rep. NOK-59-383. California: Hawthorne.
Reid, W. H. 1965 In Basic Developments in Fluid Dynamics, vol. I (ed. M. Holt), pp. 249–307. Academic.
Shaikh, F. N. & Gaster, M. 1994 J. Engng Maths 28, 55–71.
Smith, F. T. 1979 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 366, 91–109.
Smith, F. T. & Burggraf, O. R. 1985 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 399, 25–55.
Smith, F. T. & Stewart, P. A. 1987 J. Fluid Mech. 179, 227–252.
Stewartson, K. & Stuart, J. T. 1971 J. Fluid Mech. 48, 529–545.