Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:44:45.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mixing-scale dependent dispersion for transport in heterogeneous flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2015

Marco Dentz  and
Felipe P. J. de Barros
Marco Dentz*
Affiliation:
Spanish National Research Council, IDAEA-CSIC, c/Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Felipe P. J. de Barros
Affiliation:
Sonny Astani Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, 3620 S. Vermont Avenue, KAP 224B, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dispersion quantifies the impact of subscale velocity fluctuations on the effective movement of particles and the evolution of scalar distributions in heterogeneous flows. Which fluctuation scales are represented by dispersion, and the very meaning of dispersion, depends on the definition of the subscale, or the corresponding coarse-graining scale. We study here the dispersion effect due to velocity fluctuations that are sampled on the homogenization scale of the scalar distribution. This homogenization scale is identified with the mixing scale, the characteristic length below which the scalar is well mixed. It evolves in time as a result of local-scale dispersion and the deformation of material fluid elements in the heterogeneous flow. The fluctuation scales below the mixing scale are equally accessible to all scalar particles, and thus contribute to enhanced scalar dispersion and mixing. We focus here on transport in steady spatially heterogeneous flow fields such as porous media flows. The dispersion effect is measured by mixing-scale dependent dispersion coefficients, which are defined through a filtering operation based on the evolving mixing scale. This renders the coarse-grained velocity as a function of time, which evolves as velocity fluctuation scales are assimilated by the expanding scalar. We study the behaviour of the mixing-scale dependent dispersion coefficients for transport in a random shear flow and in heterogeneous porous media. Using a stochastic modelling framework, we derive explicit expressions for their time behaviour. The dispersion coefficients evolve as the mixing scale scans through the pertinent velocity fluctuation scales, which reflects the fundamental role of the interaction of scalar and velocity fluctuation scales in solute mixing and dispersion.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Geophysical and Geological Flows Low-Reynolds-number flows: Low-Reynolds-number flows
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 777 , 25 August 2015 , pp. 178 - 195
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

de Barros, F. P. J., Dentz, M., Koch, J. & Nowak, W. 2012 Flow topology and scalar mixing in spatially heterogeneous flow fields. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39 (8), L08404.Google Scholar
de Barros, F. P. J. & Rubin, Y. 2011 Modelling of block-scale macrodispersion as a random function. J. Fluid Mech. 676, 514–545.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1959 Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid. Part 1. General discussion and the case of small conductivity. J. Fluid Mech. 5 (1), 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bear, J. 1972 Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Beckie, R. 1996 Measurement scale, network sampling scale, and groundwater model parameters. Water Resour. Res. 32 (1), 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, R., Aldama, A. & Wood, E. F. 1996 Modeling the large-scale dynamics of saturated groundwater flow using spatial-filtering theory: 1. Theoretical development. Water Resour. Res. 32 (5), 1269–1280.Google Scholar
Bolster, D., Dentz, M. & Le Borgne, T. 2011 Hyper mixing in shear flow. Water Resour. Res. 47, W09602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchaud, J.-P. & Georges, A. 1990 Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications. Phys. Rep. 195 (4), 127–293.Google Scholar
Brenner, H. 1980 Dispersion resulting from flow through spatially periodic porous media. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 297 (1430), 81–133.Google Scholar
Clincy, M. & Kinzelbach, H. 2001 Stratified disordered media: exact solutions for transport parameters and their self-averaging properties. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 (36), 7141.Google Scholar
Dagan, G. 1987 Theory of solute transport by groundwater. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 19 (1), 183–213.Google Scholar
Dagan, G. 1991 Dispersion of a passive solute in non-ergodic transport by steady velocity fields in heterogeneous formations. J. Fluid Mech. 233, 197–210.Google Scholar
De Simoni, M., Carrera, J., Sánchez-Vila, X. & Guadagnini, A. 2005 A procedure for the solution of multicomponent reactive transport problems. Water Resour. Res. 41, WR004056.Google Scholar
Dentz, M., Kinzelbach, H., Attinger, S. & Kinzelbach, W. 2000 Temporal behavior of a solute cloud in a heterogeneous porous medium: 1. Point-like injection. Water Resour. Res. 36 (12), 3591–3604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dentz, M., Le Borgne, T., Englert, A. & Bijeljic, B. 2011 Mixing, spreading and reaction in heterogeneous media: a brief review. J. Contam. Hydrol. 120, 1–17.Google Scholar
Duplat, J., Innocenti, C. & Villermaux, E. 2010 A nonsequential turbulent mixing process. Phys. Fluids 22, 035104.Google Scholar
Ferziger, J. H. & Perić, M. 2002 Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, vol. 3. Springer.Google Scholar
Fiori, A. 1998 On the influence of pore-scale dispersion in nonergodic transport in heterogeneous formations. Transp. Porous Med. 30 (1), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelhar, L. W. & Axness, C. L. 1983 Three-dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 19 (1), 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornung, Ulrich. 1997 Homogenization and Porous Media. Springer.Google Scholar
Kitanidis, P. 1988 Prediction by the method of moments of transport in a heterogeneous formation. J. Hydrol. 102 (1), 453–473.Google Scholar
Kubo, R., Toda, M. & Hashitsume, N. 1991 Statistical Physics II, Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics. Springer.Google Scholar
Le Borgne, T., Dentz, M., Davy, P., Bolster, D., Carrera, J., De Dreuzy, J.-R. & Bour, O. 2011 Persistence of incomplete mixing: a key to anomalous transport. Phys. Rev. E 84 (1), 015301.Google Scholar
Le Borgne, T., Dentz, M. & Villermaux, E. 2013 Stretching, coalescence, and mixing in porous media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (20), 204501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Borgne, T., Dentz, M. & Villermaux, E. 2015 The lamellar description of mixing in porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 770, 458–498.Google Scholar
Matheron, M. & de Marsily, G. 1980 Is transport in porous media always diffusive? Water Resour. Res. 16, 901–917.Google Scholar
Mehrabi, A. R. & Sahimi, M. 1997 Coarsening of heterogeneous media: application of wavelets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (22), 4385–4388.Google Scholar
Meunier, P. & Villermaux, E. 2010 The diffusive strip method for scalar mixing in two dimensions. J. Fluid Mech. 662, 134–172.Google Scholar
Ranz, W. E. 1979 Application of a stretch model to mixing, diffusion and reaction in laminar and turbulent flows. AIChE J. 25 (1), 41–47.Google Scholar
Risken, H. 1996 The Fokker–Planck Equation. Springer.Google Scholar
Rubin, Y. 2003 Applied Stochastic Hydrogeology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Y., Sun, A., Maxwell, R. & Bellin, A. 1999 The concept of block-effective macrodispersivity and a unified approach for grid-scale- and plume-scale-dependent transport. J. Fluid Mech. 395, 161–180.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. 1953 Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 219 (1137), 186–203.Google Scholar
Tél, T., de Moura, A., Grebogi, C. & Károlyi, G. 2005 Chemical and biological activity in open flows: a dynamical system approach. Phys. Rep. 413 (2), 91–196.Google Scholar
Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. L. 1972 A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Villermaux, E. 2012 Mixing by porous media. C. R. Méc. 340 (11), 933–943.Google Scholar
Villermaux, E. & Duplat, J. 2003 Mixing as an aggregation process. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (18), 184501.Google Scholar
Villermaux, E. & Duplat, J. 2006 Coarse grained scale of turbulent mixtures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (14), 144506.Google Scholar
Weiss, J. B. & Provenzale, A. 2008 Transport and Mixing in Geophysical Flows, vol. 744. Springer.Google Scholar
Whitaker, S. 1999 The Method of Volume Averaging. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Wood, B. D., Cherblanc, F., Quintard, M. & Whitaker, S. 2003 Volume averaging for determining the effective dispersion tensor: closure using periodic unit cells and comparison with ensemble averaging. Water Resour. Res. 39, 1210.Google Scholar
Zavala-Sanchez, V., Dentz, M. & Sanchez-Vila, X. 2009 Characterization of mixing and spreading in a bounded stratified medium. Adv. Water Resour. 32, 635–648.Google Scholar