Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T16:54:46.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurements of the wind-wave energy flux in an opposing wind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

Ian R. Young  and
Rodney J. Sobey
Ian R. Young
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, D-2000 Hamburg 13, West Germany Present address: Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.
Rodney J. Sobey
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A wind-wave flume which allows mechanically generated water waves to propagate in opposition to a boundary-layer air flow has been used to measure the air-flow structure in an opposing wind–wave situation. Measurements of the wave-induced pressure closely follow the predictions of potential flow theory, with the pressure in antiphase with the water surface. Hence, in contrast to the following wind situation, there is no appreciable air–water energy flux due to normal stresses. The vertical and horizontal wave-induced velocities deviate slightly in magnitude from the potential flow result while still following it qualitatively. Based on these velocity measurements it is determined that the Reynolds stress $-\rho_{\rm a}\overline{\tilde{u}\tilde{u}}$ is the dominant term in causing the decay of waves in opposing winds. The predicted rate of decay has a squared dependence on the wave slope and the ratio of wind speed to wave phase speed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 151 , February 1985 , pp. 427 - 442
Copyright
© 1985 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amorocho, J. & De Vries J. J.1980 A new evaluation of the wind stress coefficient over water surfaces. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 433–442.Google Scholar
Cermak J. E.1971 Laboratory simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer. AIAA J. 9, 1746–1754.Google Scholar
Chao, S. P. & Hsu E. Y.1978 Wave-induced velocities and turbulent Reynolds stress above an air—water interface. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans 2, 471–493.Google Scholar
Dobson F. W.1971 Measurements of atmospheric pressure on wind-generated sea waves. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 91–127.Google Scholar
Elliott J. A.1972 Microscale pressure fluctuations near waves being generated by wind. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 427–448.Google Scholar
Hsu C. T., Hsu, E. Y. & Street R. L.1981 On the structure of turbulent flow over progressive water waves: theory and experiment in a transformed wave-following co-ordinate system. J. Fluid Mech. 105, 87–117.Google Scholar
Lamb H.1932 Hydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Longuet-Higgins M. S.1969 A nonlinear mechanism for the generation of sea waves Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 311, 371–389.Google Scholar
Miles J. W.1957 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 185–204.Google Scholar
Miles J. W.1959 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows, Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 568–582.Google Scholar
Miles J. W.1960 On the generation of surface waves by turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 7, 496–478.Google Scholar
Miles J. W.1962 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows, Part 4. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 433–448.Google Scholar
Miles J. W.1967 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows, Part 5. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 163–175.Google Scholar
Phillips O. M.1957 On the generation of waves by turbulent wind. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 417–445.Google Scholar
Phillips O. M.1977 The Dynamics of the Upper Ocean, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
Shemdin O. H.1969 Instantaneous velocity and pressure measurements above propagating waves. Tech. Rep. No. 4, Dept. of Coastal and Oceanographic Engng, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Simiu, E. & Scanlan R. H.1978 Wind Effects on Structures: an Introduction to Wind Engineering. Wiley.
Snodgrass, F. E. et al. 1966 Propagation of ocean swell across the Pacific Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 259, 431–497.Google Scholar
Snyder R. L.1974 A field study of wave-induced pressure fluctuations above surface gravity waves. J. Mar. Res. 32, 485–496.Google Scholar
Snyder R. L., Dobson F. W., Elliott, J. A. & Long R. B.1981 Array measurements of atmospheric pressure fluctuations above surface gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 102, 1–59.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. H. & Teague C.1980 Dekameter radar observations of ocean wave growth and decay. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 10, 128–143.Google Scholar
Wu H. Y., Hsu, E. Y. & Street R. L.1977 The energy transfer due to air-input, nonlinear wave—wave interaction and white-cap dissipation associated with wind-generated waves. Tech. Rep. No. 207, Dept of Civil Engng, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Young I. R.1983 The response of waves to an opposing wind. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, James Cook University, Australia.