Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:25:28.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The measurement of suspension rheology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2011

E. J. Hinch
E. J. Hinch*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the following featured article, Boyer, Pouliquen & Guazzelli (J. Fluid Mech., this issue, vol. 686, 2011, pp 5–25) measure the normal stresses in a suspension of non-colloidal rigid spheres. They use the classical rod-climbing experiment, except that for interesting reasons the free surface near to the rotating rod does not rise but dips down. Careful techniques reveal that the normal stresses occur only above a volume concentration of 22 %. Over a period of hours the measurements drift, typical of many observations of suspensions. This is due to particles slowly migrating away from the rotating rod. A model of the migration gives good predictions of the observed changes.

Type
Focus on Fluids
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 686 , 10 November 2011 , pp. 1 - 4
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

References

1. Beavers, G. S. & Joseph, D. D. 1975 The rotating-rod viscometer. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 475–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Boyer, F., Pouliquen, O. & Guazzelli, E. 2011 Dense suspensions in rotating-rod flows: normal stresses and particle migration. J. Fluid Mech. 686, 5–25.Google Scholar
3. Couturier, E., Boyer, F., Pouliquen, O. & Guazzelli, E. 2011 Suspensions in a tilted trough: second normal stress difference. J. Fluid Mech. 686, 26–39.Google Scholar
4. Gadala-Maria, F. 1979 The rheology of concentrated suspensions. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
5. Leighton, D. T. 1985 The shear-induced migration of particles in concentrated suspensions. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
6. Leighton, D. T. & Acrivos, 1987 Measurement of shear-induced self-diffusion in concentrated suspensions of spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 109–131.Google Scholar
7. Nott, P. R. & Brady, J. F. 1994 Pressure-driven flows of suspensions: simulation and theory. J. Fluid Mech. 275, 157–199.Google Scholar
8. Nott, P. R., Guazzelli, E. & Pouliquen, O. 2011 The suspension model revisited. Phys. Fluids 23, 043304.Google Scholar
9. Singh, A. & Nott, P. R. 2003 Experimental measurements of the normal stresses in sheared Stokesian suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 490, 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Zarraga, I. E., Hill, D. A. & Leighton, D. T. 1999 The characterization of the total stress of concentrated suspensions of non-colloidal spheres in Newtonian fluids. J. Rheol. 44, 185–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar