Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:11:15.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Large amplitude lunate-tail theory of fish locomotion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

M. G. Chopra
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge Present address: Defence Science Laboratory, Metcalfe House, Delhi, India.

Abstract

The two-dimensional theory of lunate-tail propulsion is extended to motions of arbitrary amplitude, regular or irregular, so that an accurate comparison may be made with the actual lunate-tail propulsion of scombroid fishes and cetacean mammals. There is no restriction at all on the amplitude of motion but the tail's angle of attack relative to its instantaneous path through the water is assumed to remain small. The theory is applied to the regular finite amplitude motion of a thin aerofoil with a rounded leading edge to take advantage of the suction force and a sharp trailing edge to ensure smooth tangential flow past the rear tip. This can represent the vertical motions of the horizontal lunate tails of large aspect ratio with which cetacean mammals propel themselves or the horizontal undulations of the vertical lunate tails of certain fast fishes. The dependence of the thrust, the hydromechanical propulsive efficiency and the energy wasted in churning up the eddying wake on the reduced frequency, the angle of attack and the amplitude of motion is exhibited.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1976 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breder, C. M. 1926 Zoologica, 4, 159810.
Chopra, M. G. 1974 J. Fluid Mech. 64, 375810.
Fierstine, H. L. & Walters, V. 1968 Mem. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. 6, 1810.
Gray, J. 1968 Animal Locomotion, pp. 7579. London: Weidenfield & Nicholson.
Hancock, G. J. 1953 Proc. Roy. Soc A 217, 96121.
Kármán, T. Von & Sears, W. R. 1938 J. Aero. Sci. 5, 379810.
Lighthill, M. J. 1959 Fourier Series and Generalised Functions. Cambridge University Press.
Lighthill, M. J. 1960 J. Fluid Mech. 9, 305810.
Lighthill, M. J. 1969 Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1, 413810.
Lighthill, M. J. 1970 J. Fluid Mech. 44, 265810.
Lighthill, M. J. 1971 Proc. Roy. Soc. B 179, 125810.
Lighthill, M. J. 1975 Mathematical Biofluiddynamics. Philadelphia: S.I.A.M.
Mangler, K. W. 1951 R.A.E. Rep. Aero. no. 2424.
Munk, M. 1922 N.A.C.A. Rep. no. 142.
Munk, M. 1924 N.A.C.A. Rep. no. 192.
Possio, C. 1940 Aerotecnica, 20, 655810.
Sears, W. R. 1938 5th Int. Congr. Appl. Mech., Cambridge, Mass., pp. 483487.
Taylor, G. I. 1952 Proc. Roy. Soc A 211, 225239.
Theodorsen, T. 1935 N.A.C.A. Tech. Rep. no. 496.
Wagner, H. 1925 Z. angew. Math. Mech. 5, 17810.
Weihs, D. 1972 Proc. Soc. Roy. B 182, 59810.
Wu, T. Y. 1961 J. Fluid Mech. 10, 321810.
Wu, T. Y. 1971 Adv. in Appl. Mech. 11, 1810.